INVESTIGATION ON METHODS FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIVE MODELS AND THE APPLICATION IN BEPU

被引:0
|
作者
Xiong, Qingwen [1 ]
Gou, Junli [1 ]
Shan, Jianqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Nucl Sci & Technol, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The best estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU) method is recommended by IAEA for nuclear safety analysis. Most of the existing BEPU methodologies rely on the uncertainty propagation of input parameters, while uncertainties of the constitutive models in best estimate codes tend not to be valued or even neglected. A structural method is proposed in this paper to quantify the uncertainties of the constitutive models. Different constitutive models will be classified according to the characteristics and corresponding method could be utilized for each model based on the method. Specific uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods adopted in this paper include the non-parametric curve estimation method, inverse method and design of experiment (DOE) method, and a model selection technique is adopted to opt the optimal model among all alternative models. The structural method is applied to the uncertainty evaluation of LOFT LP-02-6 experiment. Important models are identified, uncertainties of these models are quantified and propagated to the peak cladding temperature (PCT) through code calculations. Uncertainty of the PCT is quantified and the result shows that the calculated values could well envelop the experimental value.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Application of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Uncertainty Quantification in Inverse Transport Problems
    Bledsoe, Keith C.
    Hite, Jason
    Jessee, Matthew A.
    Lefebvre, Jordan P.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2021, 68 (08) : 2210 - 2219
  • [42] Uncertainty Quantification in Alchemical Free Energy Methods
    Bhati, Agastya P.
    Wan, Shunzhou
    Hu, Yuan
    Sherborne, Brad
    Coveney, Peter, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2018, 14 (06) : 2867 - 2880
  • [43] Basic Framework and Main Methods of Uncertainty Quantification
    Zhang, Juan
    Yin, Junping
    Wang, Ruili
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [44] FEM based Methods for Uncertainty Quantification in Electromagnetics
    Jos, K. T. Gladwin
    Vinoy, K. J.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INDIAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS & PROPOGATION (INCAP), 2018,
  • [45] Uncertainty due to the quantification step in analytical methods
    Galban, Javier
    Ubide, Carlos
    [J]. TALANTA, 2007, 71 (03) : 1339 - 1344
  • [46] Comparison of uncertainty quantification methods for cloud simulation
    Janjic, T.
    Lukacova-Medvidova, M.
    Ruckstuhl, Y.
    Wiebe, B.
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2023, 149 (756) : 2895 - 2910
  • [47] Uncertainty quantification for ecological models with random parameters
    Reimer, Jody R.
    Adler, Frederick R.
    Golden, Kenneth M.
    Narayan, Akil
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 25 (10) : 2232 - 2244
  • [48] Uncertainty Quantification in Control Problems for Flocking Models
    Albi, Giacomo
    Pareschi, Lorenzo
    Zanella, Mattia
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 2015
  • [49] Uncertainty quantification for monotone stochastic degradation models
    Chen, Piao
    Ye, Zhi-Sheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 50 (02) : 207 - 219
  • [50] Bayesian uncertainty quantification for anaerobic digestion models
    Picard-Weibel, Antoine
    Capson-Tojo, Gabriel
    Guedj, Benjamin
    Moscoviz, Roman
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 394