Pharmacokinetic comparison of a fixed-dose combination versus concomitant administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin in healthy adult subjects

被引:7
|
作者
Oh, Minkyung [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Jae-Gook [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ahn, Sangzin [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Bo Hoon [4 ]
Kim, Ji Yeon [4 ]
Shin, Hyun Ju [5 ]
Ghim, Jong-Lyul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Dept Pharmacol, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[2] Inje Univ, PharmacoGen Res Ctr, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Busan Paik Hosp, Busan, South Korea
[4] Daewoong Pharma, Formulat Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Daewoong Pharma, Clin Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
来源
关键词
fixed-dose combination; pharmacokinetics; amlodipine; olmesartan; rosuvastatin; BLOOD-PRESSURE; OPEN-LABEL; BIOEQUIVALENCE; MEDOXOMIL; BESYLATE;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S202730
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of a fixed dose combination (FDC) formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin. Materials and methods: This study was an open-label, randomized, cross-over design conducted in healthy male volunteers. All subjects received either a single FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg, or were co-administered an FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg and a tablet containing rosuvastatin 20 mg, for each period, with 14-day washout periods. Plasma concentrations of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Safety was evaluated by measuring vital signs, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examinations, and medical interviews. Results: Sixty-four subjects were enrolled, and 54 completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% CI for the maximum plasma concentration (C-max) and area under the curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC(t)) were 1.0716 (1.0369,1.1074) and 1.0497 (1.0243,1.0757) for amlodipine, 1.0396 (0.9818,1.1009) and 1.0138 (0.9716,1.0578) for olmesartan, and 1.0257 (0.9433,1.1152) and 1.0043 (0.9453,1.0669) for rosuvastatin. Fourteen cases of adverse events occurred in 12 subjects. There was no statistically significant clinical difference between the formulation groups. Conclusion: The 90% CI of the primary PK parameters were within the acceptance bioequivalence criteria, which is ln (0.8) and ln (1.25). These results indicate that the FDC formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan and rosuvastatin are pharmacokinetically bioequivalent and have similar safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 997
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pharmacokinetics of Rosuvastatin/Olmesartan Fixed-Dose Combination: A Single-Dose, Randomized, Open-Label, 2-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Korean Subjects
    Son, Hankil
    Roh, Hyerang
    Lee, Donghwan
    Chang, HeeChul
    Kim, JunKu
    Yun, Chohee
    Park, Kyungsoo
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 35 (07) : 915 - 922
  • [42] A Fixed-Dose Combination Of Gemigliptin And Rosuvastatin Exhibits Similar Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, And Safety Compared To That Of A Loose Combination In Healthy Subjects
    Kim, Eunwoo
    Park, Kyoung Ryun
    Jang, In-Jin
    Yu, Kyung-Sang
    Lee, SeungHwan
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2019, 13 : 3879 - 3885
  • [43] EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION OF OLMESARTAN MEDOXOMIL AND ROSUVASTATIN IN KOREAN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION AND DYSLIPIDEMIA
    Kim, S. H.
    Lee, H. L.
    Lim, W. H.
    Kim, H. L.
    Seo, J. B.
    Chung, W. Y.
    Zo, J. H.
    Kim, M. A.
    Kim, H. S.
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2016, 252 : E57 - E57
  • [44] PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF GEMIGLIPTIN/ROSUVASTATIN FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION COMPARED WITH LOOSE COMBINATION OF INDIVIDUAL TABLETS IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS.
    Hwang, I.
    Park, S-I
    Park, K.
    Yoon, S.
    Jung, J.
    Lee, S.
    Lee, H.
    Yu, K-S
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 101 (S1) : S31 - S31
  • [45] Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine fixed-dose combination for hypertensive patients uncontrolled with monotherapy
    Jun-Ren Zhu
    Shu-Yang Zhang
    Ping-Jin Gao
    Archives of Pharmacal Research, 2014, 37 : 1588 - 1598
  • [46] Critical appraisal of amlodipine and olmesartan medoxomil fixed-dose combination in achieving blood pressure goals
    Basile, Jan
    INTEGRATED BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL, 2010, 3 : 91 - 104
  • [47] Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil/amlodipine fixed-dose combination for hypertensive patients uncontrolled with monotherapy
    Zhu, Jun-Ren
    Zhang, Shu-Yang
    Gao, Ping-Jin
    ARCHIVES OF PHARMACAL RESEARCH, 2014, 37 (12) : 1588 - 1598
  • [48] Pharmacokinetic comparison between a fixed-dose combination of fimasartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide 60/10/25 mg and a corresponding loose combination of fimasartan/amlodipine 60/25 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in healthy subjects
    Jung, Jihyun
    Lee, Soyoung
    Oh, Jaeseong
    Lee, SeungHwan
    Jang, In-Jin
    Lee, Donghwan
    Yu, Kyung-Sang
    TRANSLATIONAL AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 29 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [49] Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of a telmisartan/S-amlodipine fixed-dose combination (CKD-828) formulation and coadministered telmisartan and S-amlodipine in healthy subjects
    Kang, Woo Youl
    Seong, Sook Jin
    Ohk, Boram
    Gwon, Mi-Ri
    Kim, Bo Kyung
    La, Sookie
    Kim, Hyun-Ju
    Cho, Seungil
    Yoon, Young-Ran
    Yang, Dong Heon
    Lee, Hae Won
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2018, 12 : 545 - 553
  • [50] The Bioequivalence and Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of a Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet Containing Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe in Healthy Japanese Subjects
    Nishida, Chisato
    Matsumoto, Yuki
    Fujimoto, Katsukuni
    Shirakawa, Masayoshi
    Wrishko, Rebecca Ellen
    Behm, Martin Otto
    Furihata, Kenichi
    CTS-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2019, : 704 - 712