Pharmacokinetic comparison of a fixed-dose combination versus concomitant administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin in healthy adult subjects

被引:7
|
作者
Oh, Minkyung [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Jae-Gook [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ahn, Sangzin [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Bo Hoon [4 ]
Kim, Ji Yeon [4 ]
Shin, Hyun Ju [5 ]
Ghim, Jong-Lyul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Dept Pharmacol, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[2] Inje Univ, PharmacoGen Res Ctr, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Busan Paik Hosp, Busan, South Korea
[4] Daewoong Pharma, Formulat Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Daewoong Pharma, Clin Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
来源
关键词
fixed-dose combination; pharmacokinetics; amlodipine; olmesartan; rosuvastatin; BLOOD-PRESSURE; OPEN-LABEL; BIOEQUIVALENCE; MEDOXOMIL; BESYLATE;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S202730
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of a fixed dose combination (FDC) formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin. Materials and methods: This study was an open-label, randomized, cross-over design conducted in healthy male volunteers. All subjects received either a single FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg, or were co-administered an FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg and a tablet containing rosuvastatin 20 mg, for each period, with 14-day washout periods. Plasma concentrations of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Safety was evaluated by measuring vital signs, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examinations, and medical interviews. Results: Sixty-four subjects were enrolled, and 54 completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% CI for the maximum plasma concentration (C-max) and area under the curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC(t)) were 1.0716 (1.0369,1.1074) and 1.0497 (1.0243,1.0757) for amlodipine, 1.0396 (0.9818,1.1009) and 1.0138 (0.9716,1.0578) for olmesartan, and 1.0257 (0.9433,1.1152) and 1.0043 (0.9453,1.0669) for rosuvastatin. Fourteen cases of adverse events occurred in 12 subjects. There was no statistically significant clinical difference between the formulation groups. Conclusion: The 90% CI of the primary PK parameters were within the acceptance bioequivalence criteria, which is ln (0.8) and ln (1.25). These results indicate that the FDC formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan and rosuvastatin are pharmacokinetically bioequivalent and have similar safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 997
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effectiveness and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan and amlodipine in clinical practice
    Bramlage, Peter
    Wolf, Wolf-Peter
    Stuhr, Thomas
    Fronk, Eva-Maria
    Erdlenbruch, Wolfhard
    Ketelhut, Reinhard
    Schmieder, Roland E.
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2010, 6 : 803 - 811
  • [22] Amlodipine/ARB fixed-dose combinations for the treatment of hypertension: Focus on amlodipine/olmesartan combination
    Chrysant, Steven G.
    DRUGS OF TODAY, 2008, 44 (06) : 443 - 453
  • [23] Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of a rosuvastatin/ezetimibe fixed-dose combination tablet versus single agents in healthy male subjects
    Kang, Woo Youl
    Seong, Sook Jin
    Ohk, Boram
    Gwon, Mi-Ri
    Kim, Bo Kyung
    Na, Sookie
    Kim, Hyun-Ju
    Yoon, Young-Ran
    Lee, Hae Won
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 56 (01) : 43 - 52
  • [24] Pharmacokinetic comparison of amlodipine adipate/valsartan and amlodipine besylate/valsartan as fixed-dose combinations in healthy volunteers
    Nam, Ju-Hyun
    Oh, Minkyung
    Kim, Hyun Ji
    Han, Sung Kyun
    Kim, Eun Ji
    Song, Geun Seog
    Kim, Eun-Young
    Shin, Jae-Gook
    Ghim, Jong-Lyul
    Kim, Ho-Sook
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 53 (01) : 66 - 74
  • [25] A fixed-dose combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine besylate is bioequivalent to free combination of the agents
    Haworth, S.
    Bathala, M.
    Lee, J.
    Allison, M.
    Rohatagi, S.
    Marier, J. F.
    Rubets, I.
    Salazar, D.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2007, 25 : S237 - S237
  • [26] Pharmacokinetics of a Fixed-Dose Combination Product of Amlodipine, Losartan, Ezetimibe, and Rosuvastatin and Its Comparison with Co-administration of Four Individual Components in Healthy Participants
    Park, Jin-Woo
    Chung, Hyewon
    Kim, Jong-Min
    Kim, Na Young
    Hong, Sung Hee
    Kim, Kyoung-Ah
    Park, Ji-Young
    DRUGS IN R&D, 2024, 24 (02) : 179 - 186
  • [27] Clinical Impact of Patient Adherence to a Fixed-Dose Combination of Olmesartan, Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide
    Peter Bramlage
    Reinhard Ketelhut
    Eva-Maria Fronk
    Wolf-Peter Wolf
    Rüdiger Smolnik
    Claudia Zemmrich
    Roland E. Schmieder
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2014, 34 : 403 - 411
  • [28] The bioavailability of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan medoxomil and amlodipine besylate is unaffected by food
    Haworth, S.
    Heyrman, R.
    Bathala, M.
    Lee, J.
    Noveck, R.
    Rohatagi, S.
    Marier, J. F.
    Rubets, I.
    Salazar, D.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2007, 25 : S237 - S238
  • [29] Clinical Impact of Patient Adherence to a Fixed-Dose Combination of Olmesartan, Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide
    Bramlage, Peter
    Ketelhut, Reinhard
    Fronk, Eva-Maria
    Wolf, Wolf-Peter
    Smolnik, Ruediger
    Zemmrich, Claudia
    Schmieder, Roland E.
    CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2014, 34 (06) : 403 - 411
  • [30] Economic evaluation of olmesartan/amlodipine fixed-dose combination for hypertension treatment in China
    Ren, Maodong
    Xuan, Dennis
    Lu, Yongji
    Fu, YuYan
    Xuan, Jianwei
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (04) : 394 - 400