Pharmacokinetic comparison of a fixed-dose combination versus concomitant administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin in healthy adult subjects

被引:7
|
作者
Oh, Minkyung [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Jae-Gook [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ahn, Sangzin [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Bo Hoon [4 ]
Kim, Ji Yeon [4 ]
Shin, Hyun Ju [5 ]
Ghim, Jong-Lyul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Dept Pharmacol, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[2] Inje Univ, PharmacoGen Res Ctr, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Busan Paik Hosp, Busan, South Korea
[4] Daewoong Pharma, Formulat Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Daewoong Pharma, Clin Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
来源
关键词
fixed-dose combination; pharmacokinetics; amlodipine; olmesartan; rosuvastatin; BLOOD-PRESSURE; OPEN-LABEL; BIOEQUIVALENCE; MEDOXOMIL; BESYLATE;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S202730
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of a fixed dose combination (FDC) formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin. Materials and methods: This study was an open-label, randomized, cross-over design conducted in healthy male volunteers. All subjects received either a single FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg, or were co-administered an FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg and a tablet containing rosuvastatin 20 mg, for each period, with 14-day washout periods. Plasma concentrations of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Safety was evaluated by measuring vital signs, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examinations, and medical interviews. Results: Sixty-four subjects were enrolled, and 54 completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% CI for the maximum plasma concentration (C-max) and area under the curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC(t)) were 1.0716 (1.0369,1.1074) and 1.0497 (1.0243,1.0757) for amlodipine, 1.0396 (0.9818,1.1009) and 1.0138 (0.9716,1.0578) for olmesartan, and 1.0257 (0.9433,1.1152) and 1.0043 (0.9453,1.0669) for rosuvastatin. Fourteen cases of adverse events occurred in 12 subjects. There was no statistically significant clinical difference between the formulation groups. Conclusion: The 90% CI of the primary PK parameters were within the acceptance bioequivalence criteria, which is ln (0.8) and ln (1.25). These results indicate that the FDC formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan and rosuvastatin are pharmacokinetically bioequivalent and have similar safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 997
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Fixed-dose Combination of Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe Versus Separate Tablets in Healthy Subjects
    Min, Kyoung Lok
    Park, Min Soo
    Jung, Jina
    Chang, Min Jung
    Kim, Choon Ok
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 39 (09) : 1799 - 1810
  • [12] Pharmacokinetic Comparison of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Candesartan Cilexetil/Amlodipine/Atorvastatin Versus Co-administration of Individual Formulations in Healthy Participants
    Kim, Jae Hoon
    Song, Ji Hye
    Kim, MinYoung
    Hong, Jang Hee
    Sunwoo, Jung
    Jung, Jin-Gyu
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2024, 41 (07) : 2808 - 2825
  • [13] Comparative pharmacokinetics of a fixed-dose combination vs concomitant administration of telmisartan and S-amlodipine in healthy adult volunteers
    Oh, Minkyung
    Park, Sung-Eun
    Ghim, Jong-Lyul
    Choi, Young-Kyung
    Shim, Eon-Jeong
    Shin, Jae-Gook
    Kim, Eun-Young
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2017, 11 : 3543 - 3550
  • [14] Pharmacokinetics of Amlodipine and Olmesartan After Administration of Amlodipine Besylate and Olmesartan Medoxomil in Separate Dosage Forms and as a Fixed-Dose Combination
    Rohatagi, Shashank
    Lee, James
    Shenouda, Magdy
    Haworth, Stephen
    Bathala, Mohinder Singh
    Allison, Mark
    Rubets, Igor
    Heyrman, Reinilde
    Noveck, Robert
    Salazar, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2008, 48 (11): : 1309 - 1322
  • [15] Bioequivalence evaluation of two amlodipine salts, besylate and orotate, each in a fixed-dose combination with olmesartan in healthy subjects
    Lee, Soo-Yun
    Kim, Jung-Ryul
    Jung, Jin Ah
    Huh, Wooseong
    Bahng, Mi Young
    Ko, Jae-Wook
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2015, 9 : 2811 - 2817
  • [16] Pharmacokinetics of a new fixed-dose combination of candesartan cilexetil, hydrochlorothiazide, and rosuvastatin in healthy adult subjects
    Yerino, Gustavo A.
    Feleder, Ethel C.
    Halabe, Emilia K.
    Diaz, Liliana
    Sakson, Mario
    Iglesias, Mariana
    Haddad, Tobias
    Roldan, Emilio
    Mondelo, Nelida
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 60 (04) : 192 - 206
  • [17] The relative bioavailability of 2 prototype fixed-dose combination formulations for amlodipine and rosuvastatin in healthy white and Chinese subjects
    Nwe, Htar H.
    Bullman, Jonathan N.
    Joshi, Shashidhar M.
    Stylianou, Annie
    Kapsi, Shiva G.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 5 (02): : 131 - 140
  • [18] Olmesartan Medoxomil/Amlodipine/Hydrochlorothiazide Fixed-Dose Combination in Hypertension
    Deeks, Emma D.
    DRUGS, 2011, 71 (02) : 209 - 220
  • [19] Pharmacokinetic and Safety Comparison of Fixed-Dose Combination of Cilostazol/Rosuvastatin (200+20 mg) Versus Concurrent Administration of the Separate Components in Healthy Adults
    Kim, Jae Hoon
    Hong, Jang Hee
    Jung, Jin-Gyu
    Jung, Won Tae
    Nam, Kyu-Yeol
    Roh, Jae Seok
    Choi, Youn Woong
    Bang, Junbae
    Huh, Hyunwook
    Lee, Hye J.
    Moon, Jungha
    Kim, Jaehee
    Sunwoo, Jung
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 13 (08): : 842 - 851
  • [20] Pharmacokinetic comparison of a fixed-dose combination of telmisartan/rosuvastatin/ezetimibe/amlodipine 80/20/10/5 mg and a loose-dose combination of ezetimibe/rosuvastatin 10/20 mg and telmisartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg in healthy male subjects
    Lee, Sooyoun
    Kim, Hyun Chul
    Kim, Kyung Tae
    Kang, Seung-Hyun
    Lee, Seunghwan
    Yu, Kyung-Sang
    Lee, Soyoung
    NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2025,