Pharmacokinetic comparison of a fixed-dose combination versus concomitant administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin in healthy adult subjects

被引:7
|
作者
Oh, Minkyung [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Jae-Gook [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ahn, Sangzin [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Bo Hoon [4 ]
Kim, Ji Yeon [4 ]
Shin, Hyun Ju [5 ]
Ghim, Jong-Lyul [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Dept Pharmacol, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[2] Inje Univ, PharmacoGen Res Ctr, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Busan Paik Hosp, Busan, South Korea
[4] Daewoong Pharma, Formulat Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Daewoong Pharma, Clin Res Team, Seoul, South Korea
来源
关键词
fixed-dose combination; pharmacokinetics; amlodipine; olmesartan; rosuvastatin; BLOOD-PRESSURE; OPEN-LABEL; BIOEQUIVALENCE; MEDOXOMIL; BESYLATE;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S202730
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profiles of a fixed dose combination (FDC) formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin. Materials and methods: This study was an open-label, randomized, cross-over design conducted in healthy male volunteers. All subjects received either a single FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg/rosuvastatin 20 mg, or were co-administered an FDC tablet containing amlodipine 10 mg/olmesartan 40 mg and a tablet containing rosuvastatin 20 mg, for each period, with 14-day washout periods. Plasma concentrations of amlodipine, olmesartan, and rosuvastatin were measured by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Safety was evaluated by measuring vital signs, clinical laboratory parameters, physical examinations, and medical interviews. Results: Sixty-four subjects were enrolled, and 54 completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% CI for the maximum plasma concentration (C-max) and area under the curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC(t)) were 1.0716 (1.0369,1.1074) and 1.0497 (1.0243,1.0757) for amlodipine, 1.0396 (0.9818,1.1009) and 1.0138 (0.9716,1.0578) for olmesartan, and 1.0257 (0.9433,1.1152) and 1.0043 (0.9453,1.0669) for rosuvastatin. Fourteen cases of adverse events occurred in 12 subjects. There was no statistically significant clinical difference between the formulation groups. Conclusion: The 90% CI of the primary PK parameters were within the acceptance bioequivalence criteria, which is ln (0.8) and ln (1.25). These results indicate that the FDC formulation and co-administration of amlodipine, olmesartan and rosuvastatin are pharmacokinetically bioequivalent and have similar safety profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 997
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety and effectiveness of a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide in clinical practice
    Bramlage, Peter
    Fronk, Eva-Maria
    Wolf, Wolf-Peter
    Smolnik, Ruediger
    Sutton, Gemma
    Schmieder, Roland E.
    VASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2015, 11 : 1 - 8
  • [32] Efficacy and tolerability between an olmesartan/amlodipine fixed-dose combination and an amlodipine double dose in mild to moderate hypertension
    Lin, Tsung-Hsien
    Tsai, Cheng-Dao
    Pan, Ju-Pin
    Hou, Charles Jia-Yin
    Hsia, Chien-Hsun
    Tsai, Jui-Peng
    Lai, Wen-Ter
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 29 (05): : 265 - 270
  • [33] PHARMACOKINETIC COMPARISON OF AMLODIPINE ADIPATE VALSARTAN FIXED DOSE COMBINATION WITH AMLODIPINE BESYLATE VALSARTAN COMBINATION IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS
    Nam, J.
    Oh, M.
    Kim, H.
    Han, S.
    Kim, E.
    Song, G.
    Kim, E.
    Shin, J.
    Ghim, J.
    Kim, H.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 95 : S21 - S22
  • [34] Bioequivalence Study of a New Fixed-dose Combination Tablet Containing S-Amlodipine Nicotinate and Olmesartan Medoxomil in Healthy Korean Male Subjects
    Oh, Mi Jin
    Hwang, Hyun Hwan
    Kim, Hyun Gyu
    Lee, Geun Hyeog
    Cho, Yun-Seok
    Lee, Sun Young
    Kang, Soo Yeon
    Cho, Kyung Hee
    Lee, Yun Young
    Lee, Yun Jeong
    Jang, Choon-Gon
    Lee, Seok-Yong
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 39 (07) : 1371 - 1379
  • [35] A fixed-dose lisinopril plus amlodipine plus rosuvastatin combination: prospects for its use in patients with hypertension and concomitant dyslipidemia
    Podzolkov, V. I.
    Bragina, A. E.
    Osadchiy, K. K.
    TERAPEVTICHESKII ARKHIV, 2017, 89 (12) : 133 - 140
  • [36] Pharmacokinetic comparison of a fixed-dose combination of metformin/gliclazide versus coadministration of metformin and gliclazide as separate tablets in healthy male subjects.
    Lim, Y.
    Shin, H.
    Shim, M.
    Lim, M.
    Moon, D.
    Choi, Y.
    Lee, Y.
    Yoon, J.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 81 : S61 - S61
  • [39] PHARMACOKINETIC COMPARISON BETWEEN A FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION OF ATORVASTATIN/OMEGA-3 AND THE CORRESPONDING LOOSE COMBINATION IN HEALTHY KOREAN SUBJECTS
    Khwarg, J.
    Lee, S.
    Oh, J.
    Kang, W.
    Lee, H.
    Kim, K.
    Jeong, K.
    Won, C.
    Choi, Y.
    Ha, D.
    Jung, R.
    Han, M.
    Jung, W.
    Nam, K.
    Kim, Y.
    Jang, I.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 113 : S66 - S66
  • [40] USE OF DOUBLE FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION OF OLMESARTAN AND AMLODOPINE VERSUS FIXED-DOSE COMBINATION OF LISINIPRIL AND AMLODOPINE IN UNCONTROLLED HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
    Koval, Sergey
    Penkova, Marina
    Starcenko, Tatiyana
    Rieznik, Larisa
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2021, 39 : E135 - E135