ACCURACY OF COMPLETE-ARCH DENTAL IMPRESSIONS: A NEW METHOD OF MEASURING TRUENESS AND PRECISION

被引:434
|
作者
Ender, Andreas [1 ]
Mehl, Albert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Div Computerized Restorat Dent, Ctr Dent Med, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2013年 / 109卷 / 02期
关键词
IN-VITRO; DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY; RESTORATIONS; ACQUISITION; MONOPHASE; SYSTEM; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. A new approach to both 3-dimensional (3D) trueness and precision is necessary to assess the accuracy of intraoral digital impressions and compare them to conventionally acquired impressions. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate whether a new reference scanner is capable of measuring conventional and digital intraoral complete-arch impressions for 3D accuracy. Material and methods. A steel reference dentate model was fabricated and measured with a reference scanner (digital reference model). Conventional impressions were made from the reference model, poured with Type IV dental stone, scanned with the reference scanner, and exported as digital models. Additionally, digital impressions of the reference model were made and the digital models were exported. Precision was measured by superimposing the digital models within each group. Superimposing the digital models on the digital reference model assessed the trueness of each impression method. Statistical significance was assessed with an independent sample t test (alpha=.05). Results. The reference scanner delivered high accuracy over the entire dental arch with a precision of 1.6 +/- 0.6 mu m and a trueness of 5.3 +/- 1.1 mu m. Conventional impressions showed significantly higher precision (12.5 +/- 2.5 mu m) and trueness values (20.4 +/- 2.2 mu m) with small deviations in the second molar region (P<.001). Digital impressions were significantly less accurate with a precision of 32.4 +/- 9.6 mu m and a trueness of 58.6 1 +/- 5.8 mu m (P<.001). More systematic deviations of the digital models were visible across the entire dental arch. Conclusions. The new reference scanner is capable of measuring the precision and trueness of both digital and conventional complete-arch impressions. The digital impression is less accurate and shows a different pattern of deviation than the conventional impression. (J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-128)
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 128
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients
    Kuhr, F.
    Schmidt, A.
    Rehmann, P.
    Woestmann, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2016, 55 : 68 - 74
  • [32] Cast metal sprue as an alternative to dental floss for splinting open tray impression copings for complete-arch implant impressions
    Gaikwad, Amit M.
    Joshi, Amruta A.
    Nadgere, Jyoti B.
    Kokuyo, Camlin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (06): : 816 - 818
  • [33] Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study
    Passos, Leandro
    Meiga, Sergio
    Brigagao, Vinicius
    Street, Alexandre
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERIZED DENTISTRY, 2019, 22 (04) : 307 - 319
  • [34] Assessment of impression material accuracy in complete-arch restorations on four implants
    Baldissara, Paolo
    Koci, Brunilda
    Messias, Aion Mangino
    Meneghello, Roberto
    Ghelli, Francesco
    Gatto, Maria Rosaria
    Ciocca, Leonardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 126 (06): : 763 - 771
  • [35] Guided implant scanning: A procedure for improving the accuracy of implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    Ballesteros, Juan
    Perales-Padilla, Pedro
    Perales-Pulido, Pedro
    Gomez-Polo, Cristina
    Ortega, Rocio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (02): : 135 - 139
  • [36] The Influence of Digital Fabrication Options on the Accuracy of Dental Implant-Based Single Units and Complete-Arch Frameworks
    Abdel-Azim, Tamer
    Zandinejad, Amirali
    Elathamna, Eiad
    Lin, Weishao
    Morton, Dean
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2014, 29 (06) : 1281 - 1288
  • [37] Accuracy of digital impressions for implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis, using an auxiliary geometry part-An in vitro study
    Iturrate, Mikel
    Eguiraun, Harkaitz
    Solaberrieta, Eneko
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (12) : 1250 - 1258
  • [38] Accuracy of complete-arch implant impression made with occlusal registration material
    Papazoglou, Efstratios
    Wee, Alvin G.
    Carr, Alan B.
    Urban, Istvan
    Margaritis, Vasileios
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (01): : 143 - 148
  • [39] A new method to measure the accuracy of intraoral scanners along the complete dental arch: A pilot study
    Iturrate, Mikel
    Lizundia, Erlantz
    Amezua, Xabier
    Solaberrieta, Eneko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2019, 11 (06): : 331 - 340
  • [40] Accuracy of four digital scanners according to scanning strategy in complete-arch impressions (vol 13, e0202916, 2018)
    Medina-Sotomayor, Priscilla
    Pascual-Moscardo, Agustin
    Camps, Isabel
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):