Monte Carlo dose verification for intensity-modulated arc therapy

被引:32
|
作者
Li, XA [1 ]
Ma, LJ [1 ]
Naqvi, S [1 ]
Shih, RP [1 ]
Yu, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Radiat Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2001年 / 46卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/46/9/301
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Intensity-modulated are therapy (IMAT), a technique which combines beam rotation and dynamic multileaf collimation, has been implemented in our clinic. Dosimetric errors can be created by the inability of the planning system to accurately account for the effects of tissue inhomogeneities and physical characteristics of the multileaf collimator (MLC). The objective of this study is to explore the use of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation for IMAT dose verification. The BEAM/DOSXYZ Monte Carlo system was implemented to perform dose verification for the IMAT treatment. The implementation includes the simulation of the linac head/MLC (Elekta SL20), the conversion of patient CT images and beam arrangement for 3D dose calculation, the calculation of gantry rotation and leaf motion by a series of static beams and the development of software to automate the entire MC process. The MC calculations were verified by measurements for conventional beam settings. The agreement was within 2%. The IMAT dose distributions generated by a commercial forward planning system (RenderPlan, Elekta) were compared with those calculated by the MC package. For the cases studied, discrepancies of over 10% were found between the MC and the RenderPlan dose calculations. These discrepancies were due in part to the inaccurate dose calculation of the RenderPlan system. The computation time for the IMAT MC calculation was in the range of 20-80 min on 15 Pentium-III computers. The MC method was also useful in verifying the beam apertures used in the IMAT treatments.
引用
收藏
页码:2269 / 2282
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intensity-modulated arc therapy: Clinical implementation and experience
    Yu, C
    Chen, DJ
    Li, A
    Ma, LJ
    Shapard, D
    Sarfaraz, M
    USE OF COMPUTERS IN RADIATION THERAPY, 2000, : 164 - 166
  • [32] COMMISSIONING AND QUALITY ASSURANCE OF INTENSITY-MODULATED ARC THERAPY
    Bedford, J.
    Warrington, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S25 - S25
  • [33] Verification system for intensity-modulated radiation therapy with scintillator
    Yasuharu Ando
    Kentaro Miki
    Jun Araki
    Masato Tsuneda
    Hiroshi Kiriu
    Teiji Nishio
    Yasushi Nagata
    Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2021, 44 : 9 - 21
  • [34] Intensity-modulated arc therapy to improve radiation dose delivery in the treatment of abdominal neuroblastoma
    Gains, Jennifer E.
    Stacey, Christopher
    Rosenberg, Ivan
    Mandeville, Henry C.
    Chang, Yen-Ch'ing
    D'Souza, Derek
    Moroz, Veronica
    Wheatley, Keith
    Gaze, Mark N.
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2013, 9 (03) : 439 - 449
  • [35] Arc-modulated radiation therapy (AMRT): a single-arc form of intensity-modulated arc therapy
    Wang, Chao
    Luan, Shuang
    Tang, Grace
    Chen, Danny Z.
    Earl, Matt A.
    Yu, Cedric X.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (22): : 6291 - 6303
  • [36] VOLUMETRIC ARC INTENSITY-MODULATED THERAPY FOR SPINE BODY RADIOTHERAPY: COMPARISON WITH STATIC INTENSITY-MODULATED TREATMENT
    Wu, Q. Jackie
    Yoo, Sua
    Kirkpatrick, John P.
    Thongphiew, Danthai
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (05): : 1596 - 1604
  • [37] Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric study
    White, Peter
    Chan, Kit Chi
    Cheng, Ka Wai
    Chan, Ka Yiu
    Chau, Ming Chun
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2013, 54 (03) : 532 - 545
  • [38] Experimental validation of a commercial 3D dose verification system for intensity-modulated arc therapies
    Boggula, Ramesh
    Lorenz, Friedlieb
    Mueller, Lutz
    Birkner, Mattias
    Wertz, Hansjoerg
    Stieler, Florian
    Steil, Volker
    Lohr, Frank
    Wenz, Frederik
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (19): : 5619 - 5633
  • [39] Dose differences in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT
    Liu, Han
    Zhuang, Tingliang
    Stephans, Kevin
    Videtic, Gregory
    Raithel, Stephen
    Djemil, Toufik
    Xia, Ping
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (06): : 91 - 99
  • [40] A robust intensity modulated proton therapy optimizer based on Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Ma, Jiasen
    Tseung, Hok Seum Wan Chan
    Herman, Michael G.
    Beltran, Chris
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (09) : 4045 - 4054