Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

被引:54
|
作者
Wang, Weizhi [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Shen, Chen [2 ]
Zhi, Xiaofei [1 ]
Wang, Baolin [2 ]
Xu, Zekuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ASSISTED DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; COMPARING OPEN; RISK-FACTORS; BLOOD-LOSS; SURGERY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0088753
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: To expand the current knowledge on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer in comparison with open total gastrectomy (OTG). Background: Additional studies comparing laparoscopic versus open total gastric resection have been published, and it is necessary to update the meta-analysis of this subject. Methods: Original articles compared LTG and OTG for gastric cancer, which published in English from January 1990 to July 2013 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Knowledge by two reviewers independently. Operative time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, analgesic medication, first flatus day, first oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, hospital mortality, 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using STATA version 10.1. Results: 17 studies were selected in this analysis, which included a total of 2313 patients (955 in LTG and 1358 in OTG). LTG showed longer operative time, less blood loss, fewer analgesic uses, earlier passage of flatus, quicker resumption of oral intake, earlier hospital discharge, and reduced postoperative morbidity. The number of harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, hospital mortality, 5-year OS and DFS were similar. Conclusion: LTG had the benefits of less blood loss, less postoperative pain, quicker bowel function recovery, shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative morbidity, at the price of longer operative time. There were no statistical differences in lymph node dissection, resection margin, hospital mortality, and long-term outcomes, which indicated the similar oncological safety with OTG. A positive trend was indicated towards LTG. So LTG can be performed as an alternative to OTG by the experienced surgeons in high-volume centers. Whereas, due to the relative small sample size of long-term outcomes and lack of randomized control trials, more studies are required.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis
    Quan, Yingjun
    Huang, Ao
    Ye, Min
    Xu, Ming
    Zhuang, Biao
    Zhang, Peng
    Yu, Bo
    Min, Zhijun
    [J]. GASTRIC CANCER, 2016, 19 (03) : 939 - 950
  • [2] Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis
    Yingjun Quan
    Ao Huang
    Min Ye
    Ming Xu
    Biao Zhuang
    Peng Zhang
    Bo Yu
    Zhijun Min
    [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2016, 19 : 939 - 950
  • [3] Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer:A meta-analysis
    Jun-Jie Xiong
    Quentin M Nunes
    Wei Huang
    Chun-Lu Tan
    Neng-Wen Ke
    Si-Ming Xie
    Xun Ran
    Hao Zhang
    Yong-Hua Chen
    Xu-Bao Liu
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2013, 19 (44) : 8114 - 8132
  • [4] Laparoscopic vs open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
    Xiong, Jun-Jie
    Nunes, Quentin M.
    Huang, Wei
    Tan, Chun-Lu
    Ke, Neng-Wen
    Xie, Si-Ming
    Ran, Xun
    Zhang, Hao
    Chen, Yong-Hua
    Liu, Xu-Bao
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (44) : 8114 - 8132
  • [5] Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leonie Haverkamp
    Teus J. Weijs
    Pieter C. van der Sluis
    Ingeborg van der Tweel
    Jelle P. Ruurda
    Richard van Hillegersberg
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2013, 27 : 1509 - 1520
  • [6] Laparoscopic total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haverkamp, Leonie
    Weijs, Teus J.
    van der Sluis, Pieter C.
    van der Tweel, Ingeborg
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 27 (05): : 1509 - 1520
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Weizhi Wang
    Zheng Li
    Jie Tang
    Meilin Wang
    Baolin Wang
    Zekuan Xu
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2013, 139 : 1721 - 1734
  • [8] Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Wang, Weizhi
    Li, Zheng
    Tang, Jie
    Wang, Meilin
    Wang, Baolin
    Xu, Zekuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 139 (10) : 1721 - 1734
  • [9] Robotic versus laparoscopic Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis
    Ke Chen
    Yu Pan
    Bin Zhang
    Hendi Maher
    Xian-fa Wang
    Xiu-jun Cai
    [J]. BMC Surgery, 17
  • [10] Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer in Asia: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Chun-Dong
    Chen, Shu-Chen
    Feng, Zi-Feng
    Zhao, Zhe-Ming
    Wang, Ji-Nan
    Dai, Dong-Qiu
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (04): : 365 - 377