Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

被引:54
|
作者
Wang, Weizhi [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Shen, Chen [2 ]
Zhi, Xiaofei [1 ]
Wang, Baolin [2 ]
Xu, Zekuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ASSISTED DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; COMPARING OPEN; RISK-FACTORS; BLOOD-LOSS; SURGERY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0088753
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: To expand the current knowledge on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer in comparison with open total gastrectomy (OTG). Background: Additional studies comparing laparoscopic versus open total gastric resection have been published, and it is necessary to update the meta-analysis of this subject. Methods: Original articles compared LTG and OTG for gastric cancer, which published in English from January 1990 to July 2013 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Knowledge by two reviewers independently. Operative time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, analgesic medication, first flatus day, first oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, hospital mortality, 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using STATA version 10.1. Results: 17 studies were selected in this analysis, which included a total of 2313 patients (955 in LTG and 1358 in OTG). LTG showed longer operative time, less blood loss, fewer analgesic uses, earlier passage of flatus, quicker resumption of oral intake, earlier hospital discharge, and reduced postoperative morbidity. The number of harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, hospital mortality, 5-year OS and DFS were similar. Conclusion: LTG had the benefits of less blood loss, less postoperative pain, quicker bowel function recovery, shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative morbidity, at the price of longer operative time. There were no statistical differences in lymph node dissection, resection margin, hospital mortality, and long-term outcomes, which indicated the similar oncological safety with OTG. A positive trend was indicated towards LTG. So LTG can be performed as an alternative to OTG by the experienced surgeons in high-volume centers. Whereas, due to the relative small sample size of long-term outcomes and lack of randomized control trials, more studies are required.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lou, Shenghan
    Yin, Xin
    Wang, Yufei
    Zhang, Yao
    Xue, Yingwei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 102
  • [32] Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer
    Chen, Ke
    Xu, Xiao-Wu
    Mou, Yi-Ping
    Pan, Yu
    Zhou, Yu-Cheng
    Zhang, Ren-Chao
    Wu, Di
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 11
  • [33] Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer
    Ke Chen
    Xiao-Wu Xu
    Yi-Ping Mou
    Yu Pan
    Yu-Cheng Zhou
    Ren-Chao Zhang
    Di Wu
    [J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 11
  • [34] Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jianglei Ma
    Xiaoyao Li
    Shifu Zhao
    Ruifu Zhang
    Dejun Yang
    [J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 18
  • [35] Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis of short outcomes
    Xiong, Binghong
    Ma, Li
    Zhang, Caiquan
    [J]. SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2012, 21 (04): : 274 - 280
  • [36] Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Jianglei
    Li, Xiaoyao
    Zhao, Shifu
    Zhang, Ruifu
    Yang, Dejun
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [37] Totally Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Meng, Xiangyu
    Wang, Lu
    Zhu, Bo
    Sun, Ting
    Guo, Shuai
    Wang, Yue
    Zhang, Jun
    Yang, Dong
    Zheng, Guoliang
    Zhang, Tao
    Zheng, Zhichao
    Zhao, Yan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2021, 31 (06): : 676 - 691
  • [38] Meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma
    Xin-Zu Chen
    Jian-Kun Hu
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2009, 23 : 1156 - 1157
  • [39] Considerations regarding a meta-analysis of laparoscopic total gastrectomy vs. laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Liu, Miao
    Shen, Ai
    Pang, Huayang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (03) : 1853 - 1854
  • [40] Meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma
    Memon, Muhammed Ashraf
    Khan, Shahjahan
    Yunus, Rossita Mohamad
    Barr, Richard
    Memon, Breda
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (08): : 1781 - 1789