Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

被引:54
|
作者
Wang, Weizhi [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Shen, Chen [2 ]
Zhi, Xiaofei [1 ]
Wang, Baolin [2 ]
Xu, Zekuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ASSISTED DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; COMPARING OPEN; RISK-FACTORS; BLOOD-LOSS; SURGERY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0088753
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: To expand the current knowledge on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer in comparison with open total gastrectomy (OTG). Background: Additional studies comparing laparoscopic versus open total gastric resection have been published, and it is necessary to update the meta-analysis of this subject. Methods: Original articles compared LTG and OTG for gastric cancer, which published in English from January 1990 to July 2013 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Knowledge by two reviewers independently. Operative time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, analgesic medication, first flatus day, first oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, hospital mortality, 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using STATA version 10.1. Results: 17 studies were selected in this analysis, which included a total of 2313 patients (955 in LTG and 1358 in OTG). LTG showed longer operative time, less blood loss, fewer analgesic uses, earlier passage of flatus, quicker resumption of oral intake, earlier hospital discharge, and reduced postoperative morbidity. The number of harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, hospital mortality, 5-year OS and DFS were similar. Conclusion: LTG had the benefits of less blood loss, less postoperative pain, quicker bowel function recovery, shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative morbidity, at the price of longer operative time. There were no statistical differences in lymph node dissection, resection margin, hospital mortality, and long-term outcomes, which indicated the similar oncological safety with OTG. A positive trend was indicated towards LTG. So LTG can be performed as an alternative to OTG by the experienced surgeons in high-volume centers. Whereas, due to the relative small sample size of long-term outcomes and lack of randomized control trials, more studies are required.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Robotic versus laparoscopic Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis
    Chen, Ke
    Pan, Yu
    Zhang, Bin
    Maher, Hendi
    Wang, Xian-fa
    Cai, Xiu-jun
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2017, 17
  • [12] Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for early distal gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Liang, Yichao
    Li, Guoxin
    Chen, Pingyan
    Yu, Jiang
    Zhang, Ce
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 81 (10) : 673 - 680
  • [13] Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients among octogenarians: a meta-analysis
    He, Fan
    Xiong, Junjie
    Liu, Hongjiang
    Tang, Chenglin
    Yang, Fuyu
    Zou, Yu
    Qian, Kun
    [J]. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2024,
  • [14] Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tian, Peirong
    Liu, Yang
    Bian, Shibo
    Li, Mengyi
    Zhang, Meng
    Liu, Jia
    Jin, Lan
    Zhang, Peng
    Zhang, Zhongtao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10
  • [15] Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hakkenbrak, Nadia A. G.
    Jansma, Elise P.
    van der Wielen, N.
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Straatman, Jennifer
    [J]. SURGERY, 2022, 171 (06) : 1552 - 1561
  • [16] Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jin-fa
    Zhang, Song-ze
    Zhang, Neng-yun
    Wu, Zong-yang
    Feng, Ji-ye
    Ying, Li-ping
    Zhang, Jing-jing
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 14
  • [17] Laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jin-fa Wang
    Song-ze Zhang
    Neng-yun Zhang
    Zong-yang Wu
    Ji-ye Feng
    Li-ping Ying
    Jing-jing Zhang
    [J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 14
  • [18] A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Shen, Wei-Song
    Xi, Hong-Qing
    Chen, Lin
    Wei, Bo
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (10): : 2795 - 2802
  • [19] A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Wei-Song Shen
    Hong-Qing Xi
    Lin Chen
    Bo Wei
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2014, 28 : 2795 - 2802
  • [20] Laparoscopy-Assisted Versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-analysis
    Shen, Hongliang
    Shan, Chengxiang
    Liu, Sheng
    Qiu, Ming
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2013, 23 (10): : 832 - 840