Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

被引:54
|
作者
Wang, Weizhi [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Shen, Chen [2 ]
Zhi, Xiaofei [1 ]
Wang, Baolin [2 ]
Xu, Zekuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ASSISTED DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; LEARNING-CURVE; COMPARING OPEN; RISK-FACTORS; BLOOD-LOSS; SURGERY; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0088753
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: To expand the current knowledge on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) for gastric cancer in comparison with open total gastrectomy (OTG). Background: Additional studies comparing laparoscopic versus open total gastric resection have been published, and it is necessary to update the meta-analysis of this subject. Methods: Original articles compared LTG and OTG for gastric cancer, which published in English from January 1990 to July 2013 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Knowledge by two reviewers independently. Operative time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, analgesic medication, first flatus day, first oral intake, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, hospital mortality, 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared using STATA version 10.1. Results: 17 studies were selected in this analysis, which included a total of 2313 patients (955 in LTG and 1358 in OTG). LTG showed longer operative time, less blood loss, fewer analgesic uses, earlier passage of flatus, quicker resumption of oral intake, earlier hospital discharge, and reduced postoperative morbidity. The number of harvested lymph nodes, proximal resection margin, hospital mortality, 5-year OS and DFS were similar. Conclusion: LTG had the benefits of less blood loss, less postoperative pain, quicker bowel function recovery, shorter hospital stay and lower postoperative morbidity, at the price of longer operative time. There were no statistical differences in lymph node dissection, resection margin, hospital mortality, and long-term outcomes, which indicated the similar oncological safety with OTG. A positive trend was indicated towards LTG. So LTG can be performed as an alternative to OTG by the experienced surgeons in high-volume centers. Whereas, due to the relative small sample size of long-term outcomes and lack of randomized control trials, more studies are required.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robotic versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Liao, Guixiang
    Chen, Jiarong
    Ren, Chen
    Li, Rong
    Du, Shasha
    Xie, Guozhu
    Deng, Haijun
    Yang, Kaijun
    Yuan, Yawei
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [22] Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Bittar, Vinicius
    Boneli, Mauricio Ferreira
    Reis, Pedro C. Abrahao
    Felix, Nicole
    Braga, Marcelo Antonio Pinheiro
    Rocha, Kian M.
    Fogaroli, Leonardo O.
    Costa, Gamaliel B.
    Comini, Ana Carolina
    Amaral, Gustavo
    Marini, Danyelle Cristine
    Camandaroba, Marcos P. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL CANCER, 2024, 55 (02) : 652 - 661
  • [23] A meta-analysis of robotic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in gastric cancer treatment
    Chen, Lei
    Wang, Qian
    Liu, Yu
    Wang, Yonghong
    Li, Yaping
    Dan, Jie
    Wang, Jian
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 45 (02) : 698 - 706
  • [24] Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The largest meta-analysis
    Guerrini, Gian Piero
    Esposito, Giuseppe
    Magistri, Paolo
    Serra, Valentina
    Guidetti, Cristiano
    Olivieri, Tiziana
    Catellani, Barbara
    Assirati, Giacomo
    Ballarin, Roberto
    Di Sandro, Stefano
    Di Benedetto, Fabrizio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 82 : 210 - 228
  • [25] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Mega Meta-Analysis
    Baral, Shantanu
    Arawker, Mubeen Hussein
    Sun, Qiannan
    Jiang, Mingrui
    Wang, Liuhua
    Wang, Yong
    Ali, Muhammad
    Wang, Daorong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [26] Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer in a Meta-Analysis of High-Quality Case-Controlled Studies
    Inokuchi, Mikito
    Otsuki, Sho
    Ogawa, Norihito
    Tanioka, Toshiro
    Okuno, Keisuke
    Gokita, Kentaro
    Kawano, Tatsuyuki
    Kojima, Kazuyuki
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 2016
  • [27] Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yongpu Yang
    Yuyan Chen
    Yilin Hu
    Ying Feng
    Qinsheng Mao
    Wanjiang Xue
    [J]. European Journal of Medical Research, 27
  • [28] Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yongpu
    Chen, Yuyan
    Hu, Yilin
    Feng, Ying
    Mao, Qinsheng
    Xue, Wanjiang
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [29] Robotic versus Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy: A Meta-Analysis
    Marano, Alessandra
    Choi, Yoon Young
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    Kim, Yoo Min
    Kim, Jieun
    Noh, Sung Hoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTRIC CANCER, 2013, 13 (03) : 136 - 148
  • [30] Effectiveness and safety of robotic versus traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qiu, Hua
    Ai, Jun-Hua
    Shi, Jun
    Shan, Ren-Feng
    Yu, Dong-Jun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (07) : 1450 - 1463