Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

被引:32
|
作者
Wang, Weizhi [1 ]
Li, Zheng [1 ]
Tang, Jie [1 ]
Wang, Meilin [2 ]
Wang, Baolin [3 ]
Xu, Zekuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Dept Occupat Med & Environm Hlth, Jiangsu Key Lab Canc Biomarkers Prevent & Treatme, Ctr Canc, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Gen Surg, Nanjing 210011, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Laparoscopic total gastrectomy; D2; dissection; Gastric cancer; Meta-analysis; ASSISTED DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; LEARNING-CURVE; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; RISK-FACTORS; SPLENECTOMY; METASTASIS; COMPLICATIONS; SURGERY; LYMPHADENECTOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s00432-013-1462-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To elucidate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 dissection (LTGD2) for gastric cancer in comparison with open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection (OTGD2). More surgeons have chosen laparoscopic total gastrectomy as an alternative to open total gastrectomy. But no meta-analysis has been performed to evaluate the value of LTGD2. Original articles compared LTGD2 and OTGD2 for gastric cancer, which published in English from January 1990 to March 2013 were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Knowledge by two reviewers independently. Operative time, blood loss, harvested lymph nodes, analgesic medication, first flatus day, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and hospital mortality were compared using STATA version 10.1. 8 studies were selected in this analysis. A total of 1,498 patients were included (559 in LTG and 939 in OTG). LTGD2 showed longer operative time (WMD 39.29; 95 % CI 20.52, 58.06; P < 0.001), less blood loss (WMD -157.94; 95 % CI -245.25 -70.62; P < 0.001), fewer analgesic requirements (WMD -2.01; 95 % CI -3.10, -0.93; P < 0.001), earlier passage of flatus (WMD -0.73; 95 % CI -1.19, -0.27; P = 0.002), earlier hospital discharge (WMD -2.69; 95 % CI -3.42, -1.97; P < 0.001), and reduced postoperative morbidity (RR 0.70; 95 % CI 0.50, 0.98; P = 0.035). The number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD 0.27; 95 % CI -1.43, 1.98; P = 0.752) and hospital mortality rate (RR 0.57; 95 % CI 0.11, 3.09; P = 0.513) were similar. LTGD2 was associated with less blood loss, less postoperative pain, quicker bowel function recovery, shorter hospital stay, and reduced postoperative morbidity, at the expense of longer operative time. No statistical differences were observed in lymph node dissection, and hospital mortality, which indicated the similar ability of lymph nodes clearance and short-term outcomes with OTGD2. A positive trend was indicated toward LTGD2. So we encourage the experienced surgeons to achieve LTGD2 instead of OTGD2. Whereas, due to non-randomized control trails and lack of long-term outcomes, more studies are required.
引用
收藏
页码:1721 / 1734
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
    Weizhi Wang
    Zheng Li
    Jie Tang
    Meilin Wang
    Baolin Wang
    Zekuan Xu
    [J]. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2013, 139 : 1721 - 1734
  • [2] Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy With D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-analysis
    Wei, Hong-Bo
    Wei, Bo
    Qi, Cui-Ling
    Chen, Tu-Feng
    Huang, Yong
    Zheng, Zong-Heng
    Huang, Jiang-Long
    Fang, Jia-Feng
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2011, 21 (06): : 383 - 390
  • [3] Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yongpu Yang
    Yuyan Chen
    Yilin Hu
    Ying Feng
    Qinsheng Mao
    Wanjiang Xue
    [J]. European Journal of Medical Research, 27
  • [4] Outcomes of laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yongpu
    Chen, Yuyan
    Hu, Yilin
    Feng, Ying
    Mao, Qinsheng
    Xue, Wanjiang
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 27 (01)
  • [6] D2 dissection in laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Cui, Ming
    Xing, Jia-Di
    Yang, Wei
    Ma, Yi-Yuan
    Yao, Zhen-Dan
    Zhang, Nan
    Su, Xiang-Qian
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (08) : 833 - 839
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Weizhi
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Shen, Chen
    Zhi, Xiaofei
    Wang, Baolin
    Xu, Zekuan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):
  • [8] Laparoscopic vs open D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
    Zou, Zhen-Hong
    Zhao, Li-Ying
    Mou, Ting-Yu
    Hu, Yan-Feng
    Liu, Jiang Yu Hao
    Chen, Hao
    Wu, Jia-Ming
    An, Sheng-Li
    Li, Guo-Xin
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (44) : 16750 - 16764
  • [9] Laparoscopic vs open D2 gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
    Zhen-Hong Zou
    Li-Ying Zhao
    Ting-Yu Mou
    Yan-Feng Hu
    Jiang Yu
    Hao Liu
    Hao Chen
    Jia-Ming Wu
    Sheng-Li An
    Guo-Xin Li
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2014, 20 (44) : 16750 - 16764
  • [10] Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy With D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Gastric Cancer
    Shinohara, Toshihiko
    Kanaya, Seiichiro
    Taniguchi, Keizo
    Fujita, Tetsuji
    Yanaga, Katsuhiko
    Uyama, Ichiro
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2009, 144 (12) : 1138 - 1142