Performance of HADDOCK and a simple contact-based protein-ligand binding affinity predictor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2

被引:92
|
作者
Kurkcuoglu, Zeynep [1 ]
Koukos, Panagiotis I. [1 ]
Citro, Nevia [1 ]
Trellet, Mikael E. [1 ]
Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M. [3 ]
Moreira, Irina S. [1 ,2 ]
Roel-Touris, Jorge [1 ]
Melquiond, Adrien S. J. [1 ]
Geng, Cunliang [1 ]
Schaarschmidt, Jorg [1 ]
Xue, Li C. [1 ]
Vangone, Anna [1 ]
Bonvin, A. M. J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Sci Chem, Bijvoet Ctr Biomol Res, Padualaan 8, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Coimbra, CNC Ctr Neurosci & Cell Biol, FMUC, Rua Larga,Polo 1,1 Andar, P-3004517 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Stanford Univ, James H Clark Ctr, 318 Campus Dr,S210, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
D3R; Drug design data resource; Docking; Binding affinity; Ranking; Intermolecular contacts; BILE-ACID BINDING; CATALYTIC MECHANISM; RECEPTOR FXR; WEB SERVER; DOCKING; PRODIGY; ANALOGS; CAPRI; TOOL; SET;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-017-0049-y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We present the performance of HADDOCK, our information-driven docking software, in the second edition of the D3R Grand Challenge. In this blind experiment, participants were requested to predict the structures and binding affinities of complexes between the Farnesoid X nuclear receptor and 102 different ligands. The models obtained in Stage1 with HADDOCK and ligand-specific protocol show an average ligand RMSD of 5.1 angstrom from the crystal structure. Only 6/35 targets were within 2.5 angstrom RMSD from the reference, which prompted us to investigate the limiting factors and revise our protocol for Stage2. The choice of the receptor conformation appeared to have the strongest influence on the results. Our Stage2 models were of higher quality (13 out of 35 were within 2.5 angstrom ), with an average RMSD of 4.1 angstrom. The docking protocol was applied to all 102 ligands to generate poses for binding affinity prediction. We developed a modified version of our contact-based binding affinity predictor PRODIGY, using the number of interatomic contacts classified by their type and the intermolecular electrostatic energy. This simple structure-based binding affinity predictor shows a Kendall's Tau correlation of 0.37 in ranking the ligands (7th best out of 77 methods, 5th/25 groups). Those results were obtained from the average prediction over the top10 poses, irrespective of their similarity/correctness, underscoring the robustness of our simple predictor. This results in an enrichment factor of 2.5 compared to a random predictor for ranking ligands within the top 25%, making it a promising approach to identify lead compounds in virtual screening.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 185
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Molecular docking performance evaluated on the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 drug-like ligand datasets
    Edithe Selwa
    Virginie Y. Martiny
    Bogdan I. Iorga
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2016, 30 : 829 - 839
  • [42] Deep neural network affinity model for BACE inhibitors in D3R Grand Challenge 4
    Bo Wang
    Ho-Leung Ng
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2020, 34 : 201 - 217
  • [43] Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation
    Sergei Grudinin
    Maria Kadukova
    Andreas Eisenbarth
    Simon Marillet
    Frédéric Cazals
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2016, 30 : 791 - 804
  • [44] Calculate protein–ligand binding affinities with the extended linear interaction energy method: application on the Cathepsin S set in the D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Xibing He
    Viet H. Man
    Beihong Ji
    Xiang-Qun Xie
    Junmei Wang
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 105 - 117
  • [45] Mathematical deep learning for pose and binding affinity prediction and ranking in D3R Grand Challenges
    Duc Duy Nguyen
    Zixuan Cang
    Kedi Wu
    Menglun Wang
    Yin Cao
    Guo-Wei Wei
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 71 - 82
  • [46] D3R Grand Challenge 4: ligand similarity and MM-GBSA-based pose prediction and affinity ranking for BACE-1 inhibitors
    Sasmal, Sukanya
    El Khoury, Lea
    Mobley, David L.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2020, 34 (02) : 163 - 177
  • [47] Mathematical deep learning for pose and binding affinity prediction and ranking in D3R Grand Challenges
    Duc Duy Nguyen
    Cang, Zixuan
    Wu, Kedi
    Wang, Menglun
    Cao, Yin
    Wei, Guo-Wei
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (01) : 71 - 82
  • [48] D3R Grand Challenge 4: ligand similarity and MM-GBSA-based pose prediction and affinity ranking for BACE-1 inhibitors
    Sukanya Sasmal
    Léa El Khoury
    David L. Mobley
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2020, 34 : 163 - 177
  • [49] Hybrid receptor structure/ligand-based docking and activity prediction in ICM: development and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Polo C.-H. Lam
    Ruben Abagyan
    Maxim Totrov
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 35 - 46
  • [50] Hybrid receptor structure/ligand-based docking and activity prediction in ICM: development and evaluation in D3R Grand Challenge 3
    Lam, Polo C. -H.
    Abagyan, Ruben
    Totrov, Maxim
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (01) : 35 - 46