Performance of HADDOCK and a simple contact-based protein-ligand binding affinity predictor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2

被引:92
|
作者
Kurkcuoglu, Zeynep [1 ]
Koukos, Panagiotis I. [1 ]
Citro, Nevia [1 ]
Trellet, Mikael E. [1 ]
Rodrigues, J. P. G. L. M. [3 ]
Moreira, Irina S. [1 ,2 ]
Roel-Touris, Jorge [1 ]
Melquiond, Adrien S. J. [1 ]
Geng, Cunliang [1 ]
Schaarschmidt, Jorg [1 ]
Xue, Li C. [1 ]
Vangone, Anna [1 ]
Bonvin, A. M. J. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Sci Chem, Bijvoet Ctr Biomol Res, Padualaan 8, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Coimbra, CNC Ctr Neurosci & Cell Biol, FMUC, Rua Larga,Polo 1,1 Andar, P-3004517 Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Stanford Univ, James H Clark Ctr, 318 Campus Dr,S210, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
D3R; Drug design data resource; Docking; Binding affinity; Ranking; Intermolecular contacts; BILE-ACID BINDING; CATALYTIC MECHANISM; RECEPTOR FXR; WEB SERVER; DOCKING; PRODIGY; ANALOGS; CAPRI; TOOL; SET;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-017-0049-y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We present the performance of HADDOCK, our information-driven docking software, in the second edition of the D3R Grand Challenge. In this blind experiment, participants were requested to predict the structures and binding affinities of complexes between the Farnesoid X nuclear receptor and 102 different ligands. The models obtained in Stage1 with HADDOCK and ligand-specific protocol show an average ligand RMSD of 5.1 angstrom from the crystal structure. Only 6/35 targets were within 2.5 angstrom RMSD from the reference, which prompted us to investigate the limiting factors and revise our protocol for Stage2. The choice of the receptor conformation appeared to have the strongest influence on the results. Our Stage2 models were of higher quality (13 out of 35 were within 2.5 angstrom ), with an average RMSD of 4.1 angstrom. The docking protocol was applied to all 102 ligands to generate poses for binding affinity prediction. We developed a modified version of our contact-based binding affinity predictor PRODIGY, using the number of interatomic contacts classified by their type and the intermolecular electrostatic energy. This simple structure-based binding affinity predictor shows a Kendall's Tau correlation of 0.37 in ranking the ligands (7th best out of 77 methods, 5th/25 groups). Those results were obtained from the average prediction over the top10 poses, irrespective of their similarity/correctness, underscoring the robustness of our simple predictor. This results in an enrichment factor of 2.5 compared to a random predictor for ranking ligands within the top 25%, making it a promising approach to identify lead compounds in virtual screening.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:175 / 185
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Predicting binding poses and affinity ranking in D3R Grand Challenge using PL-PatchSurfer2.0
    Woong-Hee Shin
    Daisuke Kihara
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2019, 33 : 1083 - 1094
  • [32] Predicting binding poses and affinity ranking in D3R Grand Challenge using PL-PatchSurfer2.0
    Shin, Woong-Hee
    Kihara, Daisuke
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2019, 33 (12) : 1083 - 1094
  • [33] D3R 2015 grand challenge: Assessment of prediction of binding poses and affinity rankings of blinded unpublished datasets
    Gathiaka, Symon
    Chiu, Michael
    Grethe, Jeffrey
    Amaro, Rommie
    Feher, Victoria
    Gilson, Michael
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [34] Affinity prediction using deep learning based on SMILES input for D3R grand challenge 4
    Sangrak Lim
    Yong Oh Lee
    Juyong Yoon
    Young Jun Kim
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2022, 36 : 225 - 235
  • [35] Affinity prediction using deep learning based on SMILES input for D3R grand challenge 4
    Lim, Sangrak
    Lee, Yong Oh
    Yoon, Juyong
    Kim, Young Jun
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2022, 36 (03) : 225 - 235
  • [36] CDOCKER and λ-dynamics for prospective prediction in D3R Grand Challenge 2
    Ding, Xinqiang
    Hayes, Ryan L.
    Vilseck, Jonah Z.
    Charles, Murchtricia K.
    Brooks, Charles L., III
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2018, 32 (01) : 89 - 102
  • [37] Molecular docking performance evaluated on the D3R Grand Challenge 2015 drug-like ligand datasets
    Selwa, Edithe
    Martiny, Virginie Y.
    Iorga, Bogdan I.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2016, 30 (09) : 829 - 839
  • [38] Deep neural network affinity model for BACE inhibitors in D3R Grand Challenge 4
    Wang, Bo
    Ng, Ho-Leung
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2020, 34 (02) : 201 - 217
  • [39] Ranking docking poses by graph matching of protein–ligand interactions: lessons learned from the D3R Grand Challenge 2
    Priscila da Silva Figueiredo Celestino Gomes
    Franck Da Silva
    Guillaume Bret
    Didier Rognan
    Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2018, 32 : 75 - 87
  • [40] Predicting binding poses and affinities for protein - ligand complexes in the 2015 D3R Grand Challenge using a physical model with a statistical parameter estimation
    Grudinin, Sergei
    Kadukova, Maria
    Eisenbarth, Andreas
    Marillet, Simon
    Cazals, Frederic
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2016, 30 (09) : 791 - 804