Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application

被引:102
|
作者
Lancsar, Emily [1 ]
Louviere, Jordan [2 ]
Donaldson, Cam [3 ]
Currie, Gillian [4 ,5 ]
Burgess, Leonie [6 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Study Choice, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[3] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Ctr Social Business & Hlth, Glasgow G4 0BA, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Paediat Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Math Sci, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Canada; Best worst discrete choice experiments; Best worst scaling; Ranking; Sequential best worst; Heterogeneity; Cardiac arrest; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; MIXED LOGIT; PREFERENCES; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A key objective of discrete choice experiments is to obtain sufficient quantity of high quality choice data to estimate choice models to be used to explore various policy/clinically relevant issues. This paper focuses on a relatively new form of choice experiment, 'Best Worst Discrete Choice Experiments' (BWDCEs) and their relevance to health research as a new way to meet such an objective. We explain what BWDCEs are, how and when to apply them and we present several analytical approaches to model the resulting data. We demonstrate this preference elicitation approach in an empirical application exploring preferences of 898 members of the general public in Edmonton and Calgary, Canada for treatment of cardiac arrest occurring in a public place and show the gains achieved compared to traditional analysis of first best data. We suggest that BWDCEs are a valuable way to investigate preferences in the health sector and discuss implications for task design, analysis and areas for future research. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 82
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Discrete choice experiments in health economics: For better or for worse?
    Bryan S.
    Dolan P.
    The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC , 2004, 5 (3): : 199 - 202
  • [32] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
    Michael D. Clark
    Domino Determann
    Stavros Petrou
    Domenico Moro
    Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
    PharmacoEconomics, 2014, 32 : 883 - 902
  • [33] Eliciting Health Care Preferences With Discrete Choice Experiments
    O'Hara, Nathan N.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (04)
  • [34] SCOPE TESTS IN HEALTH CARE DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
    Poulos, C.
    Vass, C.
    Klein, K.
    Boeri, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S320 - S320
  • [35] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
    Clark, Michael D.
    Determann, Domino
    Petrou, Stavros
    Moro, Domenico
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (09) : 883 - 902
  • [36] Using best-worst scaling choice experiments to elicit the most important domains of health for health-related quality of life in Singapore
    Uy, Elenore Judy B.
    Bautista, Dianne Carrol
    Xin, Xiaohui
    Cheung, Yin Bun
    Thio, Szu-Tien
    Thumboo, Julian
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (02):
  • [37] Discrete choice experiments or best-worst scaling? A qualitative study to determine the suitability of preference elicitation tasks in research with children and young people
    Rogers, Helen J.
    Marshman, Zoe
    Rodd, Helen
    Rowen, Donna
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2021, 5 (01)
  • [38] Discrete choice experiments or best-worst scaling? A qualitative study to determine the suitability of preference elicitation tasks in research with children and young people
    Helen J. Rogers
    Zoe Marshman
    Helen Rodd
    Donna Rowen
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 5
  • [39] Discrete choice survey experiments:: A comparison using flexible methods
    Siikamaki, Juha
    Layton, David F.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 53 (01) : 122 - 139
  • [40] Labeled versus Unlabeled Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: An Application to Colorectal Cancer Screening
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Hol, Lieke
    Donkers, Bas
    van Dam, Leonie
    Habbema, J. Dik F.
    van Leerdam, Monique E.
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (02) : 315 - 323