Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application

被引:102
|
作者
Lancsar, Emily [1 ]
Louviere, Jordan [2 ]
Donaldson, Cam [3 ]
Currie, Gillian [4 ,5 ]
Burgess, Leonie [6 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Study Choice, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[3] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Ctr Social Business & Hlth, Glasgow G4 0BA, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Paediat Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Math Sci, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Canada; Best worst discrete choice experiments; Best worst scaling; Ranking; Sequential best worst; Heterogeneity; Cardiac arrest; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; MIXED LOGIT; PREFERENCES; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A key objective of discrete choice experiments is to obtain sufficient quantity of high quality choice data to estimate choice models to be used to explore various policy/clinically relevant issues. This paper focuses on a relatively new form of choice experiment, 'Best Worst Discrete Choice Experiments' (BWDCEs) and their relevance to health research as a new way to meet such an objective. We explain what BWDCEs are, how and when to apply them and we present several analytical approaches to model the resulting data. We demonstrate this preference elicitation approach in an empirical application exploring preferences of 898 members of the general public in Edmonton and Calgary, Canada for treatment of cardiac arrest occurring in a public place and show the gains achieved compared to traditional analysis of first best data. We suggest that BWDCEs are a valuable way to investigate preferences in the health sector and discuss implications for task design, analysis and areas for future research. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 82
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Best, worst, and best&worst choice probabilities for logit and reverse models
    de Palma, Andre
    Kilani, Karim
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2023, 49
  • [22] Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment
    Soekhai, Vikas
    Donkers, Bas
    Johansson, Jennifer Viberg
    Jimenez-Moreno, Cecilia
    Pinto, Cathy Anne
    de Wit, G. Ardine
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (03): : 239 - 253
  • [23] Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling: An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment
    Vikas Soekhai
    Bas Donkers
    Jennifer Viberg Johansson
    Cecilia Jimenez-Moreno
    Cathy Anne Pinto
    G. Ardine de Wit
    Esther de Bekker-Grob
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2023, 16 : 239 - 253
  • [24] Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods
    Ali, Shehzad
    Ronaldson, Sarah
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2012, 103 (01) : 21 - 44
  • [25] Pay for performance: the best worst choice
    Millenson, ML
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 13 (05): : 323 - 324
  • [26] Attribute Selection for a Discrete Choice Experiment Incorporating a Best-Worst Scaling Survey
    Webb, Edward J. D.
    Meads, David
    Lynch, Yvonne
    Judge, Simon
    Randall, Nicola
    Goldbart, Juliet
    Meredith, Stuart
    Moulam, Liz
    Hess, Stephane
    Murray, Janice
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 (04) : 575 - 584
  • [27] Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments
    Severin, Franziska
    Schmidtke, Joerg
    Muehlbacher, Axel
    Rogowski, Wolf H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2013, 21 (11) : 1202 - 1208
  • [28] Eliciting preferences for priority setting in genetic testing: a pilot study comparing best-worst scaling and discrete-choice experiments
    Franziska Severin
    Jörg Schmidtke
    Axel Mühlbacher
    Wolf H Rogowski
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2013, 21 : 1202 - 1208
  • [29] Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single-best discrete choice experiments, should we use best-worst, best-best or ranking for preference elicitation?
    Huls, Samare P., I
    Lancsar, Emily
    Donkers, Bas
    Ride, Jemimah
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2022, 31 (12) : 2630 - 2647
  • [30] Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Ryan, Mandy
    Gerard, Karen
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 (02) : 145 - 172