Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application

被引:102
|
作者
Lancsar, Emily [1 ]
Louviere, Jordan [2 ]
Donaldson, Cam [3 ]
Currie, Gillian [4 ,5 ]
Burgess, Leonie [6 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Ctr Hlth Econ, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Ctr Study Choice, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[3] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Ctr Social Business & Hlth, Glasgow G4 0BA, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Paediat Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Math Sci, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Canada; Best worst discrete choice experiments; Best worst scaling; Ranking; Sequential best worst; Heterogeneity; Cardiac arrest; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; MIXED LOGIT; PREFERENCES; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.007
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A key objective of discrete choice experiments is to obtain sufficient quantity of high quality choice data to estimate choice models to be used to explore various policy/clinically relevant issues. This paper focuses on a relatively new form of choice experiment, 'Best Worst Discrete Choice Experiments' (BWDCEs) and their relevance to health research as a new way to meet such an objective. We explain what BWDCEs are, how and when to apply them and we present several analytical approaches to model the resulting data. We demonstrate this preference elicitation approach in an empirical application exploring preferences of 898 members of the general public in Edmonton and Calgary, Canada for treatment of cardiac arrest occurring in a public place and show the gains achieved compared to traditional analysis of first best data. We suggest that BWDCEs are a valuable way to investigate preferences in the health sector and discuss implications for task design, analysis and areas for future research. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 82
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments
    van der Pol, M
    Cairns, J
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 52 (09) : 1459 - 1470
  • [42] DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS IN HEALTH ECONOMICS: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
    Soekhai, V
    de Bekker-Grob, E. W.
    Ellis, A. R.
    Vass, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S325 - S325
  • [43] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future
    Vikas Soekhai
    Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
    Alan R. Ellis
    Caroline M. Vass
    PharmacoEconomics, 2019, 37 : 201 - 226
  • [44] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future
    Soekhai, Vikas
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Ellis, Alan R.
    Vass, Caroline M.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2019, 37 (02) : 201 - 226
  • [45] A Reporting Checklist for Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: The DIRECT Checklist
    Ride, Jemimah
    Goranitis, Ilias
    Meng, Yan
    La Bond, Christine
    Lancsar, Emily
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2024, 42 (10) : 1161 - 1175
  • [46] Using discrete choice experiments in health economics: Moving forward
    Ryan, M
    Gerard, K
    ADVANCES IN HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, : 25 - 40
  • [47] Assessing the attractiveness of tourism resources in Noto using the best–worst scaling and discrete choice experiment methods: further utilization of satoyama and satoumi for tourism
    Takahiro Tsuge
    Nisikawa Usio
    Makiko Nakano
    International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, 2023, 17 : 421 - 446
  • [48] Application of discrete choice methods in consumer preference analysis
    Bak, A
    Rybicka, A
    INNOVATIONS IN CLASSIFICATION, DATA SCIENCE, AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2005, : 305 - 312
  • [49] What are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment
    Stuart J. Wright
    Debbie Gibson
    Martin Eden
    Simon Lal
    Chris Todd
    Andy Ness
    Sorrel Burden
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2017, 11 : 782 - 790
  • [50] Consumers' Shares of Preferences for Turfgrass Attributes Using a Discrete Choice Experiment and the Best-Worst Method
    Ghimire, Monika
    Boyer, Tracy A.
    Chung, Chanjin
    Moss, Justin Q.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2016, 51 (07) : 892 - 898