Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature

被引:544
|
作者
Clark, Michael D. [1 ]
Determann, Domino [2 ,3 ]
Petrou, Stavros [4 ]
Moro, Domenico [5 ]
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Dept Econ, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Ctr Prevent & Hlth Serv Res, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[4] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[5] Birmingham City Univ, Birmingham City Business Sch, Dept Business & Mkt, Birmingham B42 2SU, W Midlands, England
关键词
WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; ADAPTIVE CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA; UNDERSTANDING PATIENT PREFERENCES; STATED PREFERENCE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; WOMENS PREFERENCES; TREATMENT OUTCOMES; PHARMACISTS PREFERENCES; CONSUMER PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used in health economics to address a wide range of health policy-related concerns. Broadly adopting the methodology of an earlier systematic review of health-related DCEs, which covered the period 2001-2008, we report whether earlier trends continued during 2009-2012. This paper systematically reviews health-related DCEs published between 2009 and 2012, using the same database as the earlier published review (PubMed) to obtain citations, and the same range of search terms. A total of 179 health-related DCEs for 2009-2012 met the inclusion criteria for the review. We found a continuing trend towards conducting DCEs across a broader range of countries. However, the trend towards including fewer attributes was reversed, whilst the trend towards interview-based DCEs reversed because of increased computer administration. The trend towards using more flexible econometric models, including mixed logit and latent class, has also continued. Reporting of monetary values has fallen compared with earlier periods, but the proportion of studies estimating trade-offs between health outcomes and experience factors, or valuing outcomes in terms of utility scores, has increased, although use of odds ratios and probabilities has declined. The reassuring trend towards the use of more flexible and appropriate DCE designs and econometric methods has been reinforced by the increased use of qualitative methods to inform DCE processes and results. However, qualitative research methods are being used less often to inform attribute selection, which may make DCEs more susceptible to omitted variable bias if the decision framework is not known prior to the research project. The use of DCEs in healthcare continues to grow dramatically, as does the scope of applications across an expanding range of countries. There is increasing evidence that more sophisticated approaches to DCE design and analytical techniques are improving the quality of final outputs. That said, recent evidence that the use of qualitative methods to inform attribute selection has declined is of concern.
引用
收藏
页码:883 / 902
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Ryan, Mandy
    Gerard, Karen
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2012, 21 (02) : 145 - 172
  • [2] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Review of the Literature
    Michael D. Clark
    Domino Determann
    Stavros Petrou
    Domenico Moro
    Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2014, 32 : 883 - 902
  • [3] Discrete choice experiments in health economics: For better or for worse?
    Bryan S.
    Dolan P.
    [J]. The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC , 2004, 5 (3): : 199 - 202
  • [4] DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS IN HEALTH ECONOMICS: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE
    Soekhai, V
    de Bekker-Grob, E. W.
    Ellis, A. R.
    Vass, C.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S325 - S325
  • [5] Using discrete choice experiments in health economics: Moving forward
    Ryan, M
    Gerard, K
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2003, : 25 - 40
  • [6] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future
    Vikas Soekhai
    Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
    Alan R. Ellis
    Caroline M. Vass
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2019, 37 : 201 - 226
  • [7] Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future
    Soekhai, Vikas
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Ellis, Alan R.
    Vass, Caroline M.
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2019, 37 (02) : 201 - 226
  • [8] Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments
    Kleij, Kim-Sarah
    Tangermann, Ulla
    Amelung, Volker E.
    Krauth, Christian
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17
  • [9] Patients’ preferences for primary health care – a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments
    Kim-Sarah Kleij
    Ulla Tangermann
    Volker E. Amelung
    Christian Krauth
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 17
  • [10] Risk as an Attribute in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Harrison, Mark
    Rigby, Dan
    Vass, Caroline
    Flynn, Terry
    Louviere, Jordan
    Payne, Katherine
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (02): : 151 - 170