Dual chamber pacing with a single-lead DDD pacing system

The successful application of single-lead VDD pacing during the last few years hers generated the idea of single-lead DDD pacing: Preliminary data from several single-lead VDD studies attempting to pace the atrium by a floating atrial dipole are unsatisfactory, causing an unacceptably high current drain of the device. We studied thefeasibility as well as the short- and long-term stability of atrioventricular sequential pacing, using a new single-pass, tined DDD lead. In eight consecutive patients (age 73 +/- 16 years) with symptomatic higher degree A V block and intact sinus node function, this new single-pass DDD lead was implanted in combination with a. DDDR pacemaker. Correct VDD and DDD function wets studied at implantation; at discharge; and at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up. At implant, the atrial stimulation threshold was 0.6 +/- 0.2 V/0.5 ms. During follow-up, the atrial pacing thresholds in different everyday positions averaged 2.1 +/- 0.5 V at discharge, 2.9 +/- 0.5 V at 2 month, 3.8 +/- 0.4 V at 3 months, and 3.4 +/- 0.4 V at 6 months (pulse width always 0.5 ms). The measured P wave amplitude at implantation was 4.5 +/- 2.2 mV; during follow-up the telemetered atrial sensitivity thresholds averaged 2.2 +/- 0.3 mV. Phrenic nerve stimulation at high output pacing (5.0 V/0.5 ms) was observed in three (38%) patients at discharge and in one (13%) patient during follow-up; an intermittent unmeasurable atrial lead impedance at 3 and 6 months follow-up was documented in one (13%) patient. This study confirms the possibility of short- and long-term DDD pacing using a single-pass DDD lead. Since atrial stimulation thresholds are still relatively high compared to conventional dual-lead DDD pacing, further improvements of the atrial electrodes are desirable, enabling lower pacing thresholds and optimizing energy requirements as well as minimizing the potential disadvantage of phrenic nerve stimulation.