Administrative Experiments: Unlocking What Works Better and What Works for Whom

被引:0
|
作者
Cody, Scott [1 ]
Perez-Johnson, Irma [2 ]
Joyce, Kristen [1 ]
机构
[1] Mathemat Policy Res, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Mathemat Policy Res, Princeton, NJ USA
关键词
administrative experiments; rapid cycle evaluation; rapid experimentation; administrative data; veterans; veterans employment services;
D O I
10.1177/1098214015600784
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Administrative experiments are increasingly available for public programs with high-quality administrative data to identify what changes make programs and services more effective. Program administrators can run short-term experiments to test improvements in programs and have causally valid impact estimates within a year. Administrative experiments also can be used to better understand what works for whom by testing program improvements on key subpopulations of program participants. This article provides an overview of rapid cycle evaluation, describes its use in identifying what works best for whom, and provides an illustrative example of how the techniques could be applied to the veterans' employment services area.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 557
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What works for whom? Genetic moderation of intervention efficacy
    Belsky, Jay
    van Ijzendoorn, Marinus H.
    DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2015, 27 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [22] What Works for Whom? A Critical Review of Psychotherapy Research
    Richards, Kaye
    COUNSELLING & PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2005, 5 (03): : 260 - 261
  • [23] INTERVENTIONS FOR CHILDREN WITH AUTISM: IDENTIFYING WHAT WORKS FOR WHOM
    Howlin, P.
    Begeer, S.
    Hudry, K.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (08) : 668 - 668
  • [24] What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research
    Jacobson, JG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 155 (01): : 146 - 147
  • [25] PERSONALIZING COGNITIVE REMEDIATION INTERVENTIONS: WHAT WORKS AND FOR WHOM?
    Fiszdon, Joanna
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2019, 45 : S104 - S104
  • [26] Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review
    Brown, Sarah
    Lhussier, Monique
    Dalkin, Sonia M.
    Eaton, Simon
    QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2018, 28 (14) : 2250 - 2266
  • [27] Complex interventions: What works, for whom, and in what circumstances? A rapid realist review
    Naughton, Stephen
    Rapaport, Penny
    Ali, Afia
    Elahi, Farah
    Lahab, Maria
    Hassiotis, Angela
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (05) : 1330 - 1330
  • [28] What Works Better? A Study of Classifying Requirements
    Abad, Zahra Shakeri Hossein
    Karras, Oliver
    Ghazi, Parisa
    Glinz, Martin
    Ruhe, Guenther
    Schneider, Kurt
    2017 IEEE 25TH INTERNATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (RE), 2017, : 496 - 501
  • [29] Experiments with Kemeny ranking: What works when?
    Ali, Alnur
    Meila, Marina
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2012, 64 (01) : 28 - 40