Administrative Experiments: Unlocking What Works Better and What Works for Whom

被引:0
|
作者
Cody, Scott [1 ]
Perez-Johnson, Irma [2 ]
Joyce, Kristen [1 ]
机构
[1] Mathemat Policy Res, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Mathemat Policy Res, Princeton, NJ USA
关键词
administrative experiments; rapid cycle evaluation; rapid experimentation; administrative data; veterans; veterans employment services;
D O I
10.1177/1098214015600784
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Administrative experiments are increasingly available for public programs with high-quality administrative data to identify what changes make programs and services more effective. Program administrators can run short-term experiments to test improvements in programs and have causally valid impact estimates within a year. Administrative experiments also can be used to better understand what works for whom by testing program improvements on key subpopulations of program participants. This article provides an overview of rapid cycle evaluation, describes its use in identifying what works best for whom, and provides an illustrative example of how the techniques could be applied to the veterans' employment services area.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 557
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research.
    Krakauer, ID
    Barber, P
    PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 1997, 7 (04) : 449 - 451
  • [42] What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research.
    Vakoch, DA
    JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1998, 186 (04) : 254 - 255
  • [43] What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research.
    Silver, RJ
    PSYCHOTHERAPY, 1997, 34 (03) : 341 - 342
  • [44] EVALUATING WHAT WORKS FOR WHOM IN ACTIVE LABOUR MARKET POLICIES
    Bredgaard, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2015, 17 (04) : 436 - 452
  • [45] What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research.
    Evans, S
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 74 : 131 - 132
  • [46] Participatory ergonomics: What works for whom and why? A realist review
    Hansen, Anne Faber
    Hasle, Peter
    Caroly, Sandrine
    Reinhold, Karin
    Jarvis, Marina
    Herrig, Astrid Overgaard
    Heiberg, Bibi Dige
    Sogaard, Karen
    Punnett, Laura
    Stochkendahl, Mette Jensen
    ERGONOMICS, 2024, 67 (01) : 13 - 33
  • [47] What works for whom? A critical review of treatments for children and adolescents
    Rutter, Michael
    CHILD AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH, 2015, 20 (02) : 126 - 126
  • [48] What Works for Whom? Youth Labour Market Policy in Poland
    Madon, Karol
    Magda, Iga
    Palczynska, Marta
    Smoter, Mateusz
    GOSPODARKA NARODOWA-THE POLISH JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2024, 318 (02):
  • [49] What works for whom? Determining the efficacy and harm of treatments for pain
    Moore, R. Andrew
    PAIN, 2013, 154 : S77 - S86
  • [50] Psychotherapy research: do we know what works for whom?
    Fonagy, Peter
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2010, 197 (02) : 83 - 85