A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant

被引:36
|
作者
Henkin, Y [1 ]
Kaplan-Neeman, R
Kronenberg, J
Migirov, L
Hildesheimer, M
Muchnik, C
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Commun Disorders, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
[2] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Speech & Hearing Ctr, Tel Hashomer, Israel
[3] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Tel Hashomer, Israel
关键词
Clarion cochlear implant; children; threshold (T) levels; comfortable (M) levels; dynamic range; electrode impedance;
D O I
10.1080/00016480500443391
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Conclusions. Electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values (EIVs) in children using the Clarion cochlear implant (CI) programmed with CIS strategy stabilized after 3 months of implant use. The data presented here may be useful as a general guideline for the programming of infants and young children and may further be of help for the identification of patients who fall outside the "average'' range. Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate changes in electrical stimulation levels, i.e. threshold (T) levels, comfortable (M) levels, dynamic range (DR), and EIVs during the first 18 months of implant use, in children using the Clarion CI. Materials and methods. The maps of 18 pre-lingual children (mean age at implantation 4.2 years; range 1-8), using the Enhanced Bipolar 1.2 or Bipolar standard electrode with the S-Series speech processor programmed with CIS strategy, were examined at five time points: connection, and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-initial stimulation. T levels, M levels, DR and EIVs were analyzed according to four cochlear segments: apical, apical-medial, medial-basal, and basal. Results. During the first 3 months of implant use T levels increased to some extent, whereas M levels and DR increased significantly. From 3 months and through the entire follow-up, T and M levels as well as DR were stable. EIVs of current carrying electrodes decreased significantly from connection to the 3-month visit; thereafter a stabilization of values was evident. Electrical stimulation levels and EIVs did not differ among the cochlear segments during the entire follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 586
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can a Cochlear Implant Be Used as an Electrical Impedance Tomography Device?
    Fourie, Friedemarie
    Thiselton, Joshua
    Hanekom, Tania
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 41 (01)
  • [32] Speech perception results in children implanted with the CLARION® Multi-Strategy™ cochlear implant
    Osberger, MJ
    Fisher, L
    Kalberer, A
    UPDATES IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION, 2000, 57 : 417 - 420
  • [33] Speech perception results for children implanted with the CLARION® cochlear implant at the Medical University of Hannover
    Illg, A
    von der Haar-Heise, S
    Goldring, JE
    Lesinski-Schiedat, A
    Battmer, RD
    Lenarz, T
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04): : 93 - 98
  • [34] The Change in Electrical Stimulation Levels During 24 Months Postimplantation for a Large Cohort of Adults Using the Nucleus® Cochlear Implant
    Gajadeera, Emalka A.
    Galvin, Karyn L.
    Dowell, Richard C.
    Busby, Peter A.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2017, 38 (03): : 357 - 367
  • [35] Cochlear implant electrode sequence optimization using patient specific neural stimulation models
    Liu, Ziteng
    Cakir, Ahmet
    Noble, Jack H.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2021, 11315
  • [36] Relaxing cochlear implant electrode design constraints using high pulse rate stimulation
    Lithgow, BJ
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOL 20, PTS 1-6: BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING TOWARDS THE YEAR 2000 AND BEYOND, 1998, 20 : 3132 - 3135
  • [37] Using electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds to fit the CLARION® cochlear implant
    Hodges, AV
    Butts, S
    Dolan-Ash, S
    Balkany, TJ
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1999, 108 (04): : 64 - 68
  • [38] Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant
    Landsberger, David M.
    Vermeire, Katrien
    Claes, Annes
    Van Rompaey, Vincent
    Van de Heyning, Paul
    EAR AND HEARING, 2016, 37 (03): : E149 - E159
  • [39] Effect of early activation of cochlear implant on electrode impedance in pediatric population
    Alhabib, Salman F.
    Abdelsamad, Yassin
    Yousef, Medhat
    Alzhrani, Farid
    Hagr, Abdulrahman
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 140
  • [40] Cochlear implantation in children with meningitis related deafness: The influence of electrode impedance and implant charge on auditory performance - A case control study
    Helmstaedter, Victor
    Buechner, Andreas
    Stolle, Stefan
    Goetz, Friedrich
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Durisin, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 113 : 102 - 109