A longitudinal study of electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance in children using the Clarion cochlear implant

被引:36
|
作者
Henkin, Y [1 ]
Kaplan-Neeman, R
Kronenberg, J
Migirov, L
Hildesheimer, M
Muchnik, C
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Commun Disorders, IL-52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel
[2] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Speech & Hearing Ctr, Tel Hashomer, Israel
[3] Chaim Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Tel Hashomer, Israel
关键词
Clarion cochlear implant; children; threshold (T) levels; comfortable (M) levels; dynamic range; electrode impedance;
D O I
10.1080/00016480500443391
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Conclusions. Electrical stimulation levels and electrode impedance values (EIVs) in children using the Clarion cochlear implant (CI) programmed with CIS strategy stabilized after 3 months of implant use. The data presented here may be useful as a general guideline for the programming of infants and young children and may further be of help for the identification of patients who fall outside the "average'' range. Objectives. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate changes in electrical stimulation levels, i.e. threshold (T) levels, comfortable (M) levels, dynamic range (DR), and EIVs during the first 18 months of implant use, in children using the Clarion CI. Materials and methods. The maps of 18 pre-lingual children (mean age at implantation 4.2 years; range 1-8), using the Enhanced Bipolar 1.2 or Bipolar standard electrode with the S-Series speech processor programmed with CIS strategy, were examined at five time points: connection, and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-initial stimulation. T levels, M levels, DR and EIVs were analyzed according to four cochlear segments: apical, apical-medial, medial-basal, and basal. Results. During the first 3 months of implant use T levels increased to some extent, whereas M levels and DR increased significantly. From 3 months and through the entire follow-up, T and M levels as well as DR were stable. EIVs of current carrying electrodes decreased significantly from connection to the 3-month visit; thereafter a stabilization of values was evident. Electrical stimulation levels and EIVs did not differ among the cochlear segments during the entire follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 586
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modeling Electrode Place Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Stimulation
    Gao, Xiao
    Grayden, David B.
    McDonnell, Mark D.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 64 (09) : 2219 - 2229
  • [22] Optimizing the number of electrodes with high-rate stimulation of the clarion CII cochlear implant
    Frijns, JHM
    Klop, WMC
    Bonnet, RM
    Briaire, JJ
    ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2003, 123 (02) : 138 - 142
  • [23] Clinical results with the CLARION(R) multi-strategy cochlear implant in children
    Osberger, MJ
    Fisher, L
    Murad, C
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, 1996, : 291 - 295
  • [24] Tinnitus Suppression with Electrical Stimulation at the Most Basal Contact of the Cochlear Implant Electrode as a Model for Round Window Stimulation
    Kheirkhah, Kiana
    Van Kelecom, Valerie
    Leblans, Marc
    van Dinther, Joost
    De Greve, Glynnis
    Offeciers, Erwin
    Zarowski, Andrzej
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2024, 20 (05):
  • [25] Reference function of old electrical stimulation electrode in cochlear-reimplantation in children
    Xu, Y.
    Ren, H-B
    Jiang, L.
    Liu, L-Y
    Han, F-G
    Wang, S-F
    EUROPEAN ANNALS OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK DISEASES, 2020, 137 (05) : 415 - 417
  • [26] Cochlear Implant Electrode Impedance as Potential Biomarker for Residual Hearing
    Wimmer, Wilhelm
    Sclabas, Luca
    Caversaccio, Marco
    Weder, Stefan
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [27] Intraoperative Cochlear Implant Reinsertion Effects Evaluated by Electrode Impedance
    Toner, Fearghal M.
    Sanli, Halit
    Hall, Andrew C.
    Birman, Catherine S.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (06) : E695 - E699
  • [28] Cochlear implant electrode impedance subcomponents as biomarker for residual hearing
    Schraivogel, Stephan
    Aebischer, Philipp
    Weder, Stefan
    Caversaccio, Marco
    Wimmer, Wilhelm
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [29] A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in Nucleus 24 cochlear implant users
    Hughes, ML
    Werff, KRV
    Brown, CJ
    Abbas, PJ
    Kelsay, DMR
    Teagle, HFB
    Lowder, MW
    EAR AND HEARING, 2001, 22 (06): : 471 - 486
  • [30] Subthreshold Electrical Stimulation for Controlling Protein-Mediated Impedance Increases in Platinum Cochlear Electrode
    Aregueta-Robles, Ulises A.
    Enke, Ya Lang
    Carter, Paul M.
    Green, Rylie A.
    Poole-Warren, Laura A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 67 (12) : 3510 - 3520