Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analyses

被引:0
|
作者
Bholsithi, W. [1 ]
Sinthanayothin, C. [1 ]
Chintakanon, K. [2 ]
Komolpis, R. [2 ]
Tharanon, W. [2 ]
机构
[1] NSTDA, Natl Elect & Comp Technol Ctr, 112 Thailand Sci Pk,Phahon Yothin Rd, Klongluang 12120, Pathumthani, Thailand
[2] NSTDA, Adv Dent Technol Ctr, Klongluang 12120, Pathumthani, Thailand
关键词
3D Cephalometric Analysis; Simplant; Cone-beam CT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This paper presented 3D cephalometric analysis on DICOM data from I-CAT CT cone-beam machine consisted of averages and standard deviations from 20 Thai males from 19 to 70 year (average 33.53 +/- 14.08 year) and 20 Thai females from 16 to 70 year (average 32.60 +/- 15.37 year). The angular measurements consisted of 49 lateral and 9 frontal measurements while linear measurements consisted of 29 lateral, 3 frontal, and 8 perpendicular measurements. Results in 3D were compared with the corresponding 2D results showing that most midline-to-midline linear measurements and some midline-to-midline angular measurements were not different, while other types of measurements were significantly different. The 3D results will be used in the clinical Ceph3D services as requested by those with interests on cephalometric analysis and anthropology with focus on Thai subjects while the 2D results will be used for comparison with cephalometric analyses from other orthodontists.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of 2D and 3D gamma analyses
    Pulliam, Kiley B.
    Huang, Jessie Y.
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Followill, David
    Bosca, Ryan
    O'Daniel, Jennifer
    Kry, Stephen F.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (02) : 021710
  • [2] Intrusion and cooling of magma - Comparison between 2D and 3D analyses
    Rikitake, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS OF THE EARTH, 1995, 43 (06): : 715 - 728
  • [3] Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images
    Yitschaky, Oded
    Redlich, Meir
    Abed, Yossi
    Faerman, Marina
    Casap, Nardy
    Hiller, Nurith
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (01) : 11 - 16
  • [4] Comparison between a 2D froth and a cut of 3D froth
    Oger, L
    Richard, P
    Troadec, JP
    Gervois, A
    [J]. POWDERS AND GRAINS 2001, 2001, : 7 - 10
  • [5] A comparison study between 2D and 3D slope stability analyses considering spatial soil variability
    Zhang, Liang
    Gong, Wen-ping
    Li, Xin-xin
    Tan, Xiao-hui
    Zhao, Chao
    Wang, Lei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A, 2022, 23 (03): : 208 - 224
  • [6] Comparison between 2D cephalometric and 3D digital model superimpositions in patients with lateral incisor agenesis treated by canine substitution
    Hage, Leya
    Kmeid, Roland
    Amm, Elie
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 165 (01) : 93 - 102
  • [7] A comparison between 2D and 3D methods of quantifying facial morphology
    Anas, I. Y.
    Bamgbose, B. O.
    Nuhu, Saleh
    [J]. HELIYON, 2019, 5 (06)
  • [8] OIL SPILL TRAJECTORY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2D AND 3D MODELS
    Soussi, Abdellatif
    Bersani, Chiara
    Tomasoni, Angela Maria
    [J]. URBAN AND MARITIME TRANSPORT XXVII, 2021, 2021, 204 : 117 - 128
  • [9] PREDICTION OF ICE ACCRETION - COMPARISON BETWEEN THE 2D AND 3D CODES
    GUFFOND, D
    HEDDE, T
    [J]. RECHERCHE AEROSPATIALE, 1994, (02): : 103 - 115
  • [10] Comparison Between 2D and 3D Measurement of Styloid Process Length
    Ab Rahman, Shaifulizan
    Hamizan, Aliea Fatinah Bt Wan
    Takeuchi, Kazuo
    Ohno, Yuzo
    Ismar, Fathin Nabilah Fasya Bt
    Sugita, Yoshihiko
    Maeda, Hatsuhiko
    Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HARD TISSUE BIOLOGY, 2018, 27 (01) : 51 - 54