Intrusion and cooling of magma - Comparison between 2D and 3D analyses

被引:3
|
作者
Rikitake, T
机构
[1] Association for the Development of Earthquake Prediction, Tokyo 101, Chiyoda-ku
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS OF THE EARTH | 1995年 / 43卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.4294/jpe1952.43.715
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Steady thermal field associated with magma mass intrusion is studied in two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) spaces. It is proved that the latter model leads to surface heat flow substantially smaller than that for the former. A numerical approach based on a relaxation technique for solving the Laplace equation is made use of. Transient heat conduction is solved when a lava dome makes an appearance on the earth's surface. Converting the differential equation that governs the problem into a difference equation, 2D and 3D solutions are obtained. It becomes apparent that the 2D analysis results in a cooling rate considerably smaller than that for the 3D analysis. A similar transient problem related to the filling of a reservoir with high-temperature magma is also studied. Even in this case, a 2D analysis leads to cooling appreciably slower than that for a 3D analysis. The mode of heat flow anomaly development at the earth's surface for the 2D analysis is noticeably different from that for the 3D analysis. In short, 3D analyses of the geothermal problems are important for obtaining realistic results although 2D analyses have so far been customary in many cases.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 728
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analyses
    Bholsithi, W.
    Sinthanayothin, C.
    Chintakanon, K.
    Komolpis, R.
    Tharanon, W.
    [J]. 4TH KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 21 (1-2): : 540 - +
  • [2] Comparison of 2D and 3D gamma analyses
    Pulliam, Kiley B.
    Huang, Jessie Y.
    Howell, Rebecca M.
    Followill, David
    Bosca, Ryan
    O'Daniel, Jennifer
    Kry, Stephen F.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (02) : 021710
  • [3] Comparison between a 2D froth and a cut of 3D froth
    Oger, L
    Richard, P
    Troadec, JP
    Gervois, A
    [J]. POWDERS AND GRAINS 2001, 2001, : 7 - 10
  • [4] A comparison study between 2D and 3D slope stability analyses considering spatial soil variability
    Zhang, Liang
    Gong, Wen-ping
    Li, Xin-xin
    Tan, Xiao-hui
    Zhao, Chao
    Wang, Lei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE A, 2022, 23 (03): : 208 - 224
  • [5] High-Performance Computing of 3D Magma Dynamics, and Comparison With 2D Simulation Results
    Garg, Deepak
    Papale, Paolo
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [6] A comparison between 2D and 3D methods of quantifying facial morphology
    Anas, I. Y.
    Bamgbose, B. O.
    Nuhu, Saleh
    [J]. HELIYON, 2019, 5 (06)
  • [7] OIL SPILL TRAJECTORY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2D AND 3D MODELS
    Soussi, Abdellatif
    Bersani, Chiara
    Tomasoni, Angela Maria
    [J]. URBAN AND MARITIME TRANSPORT XXVII, 2021, 2021, 204 : 117 - 128
  • [8] PREDICTION OF ICE ACCRETION - COMPARISON BETWEEN THE 2D AND 3D CODES
    GUFFOND, D
    HEDDE, T
    [J]. RECHERCHE AEROSPATIALE, 1994, (02): : 103 - 115
  • [9] Comparison Between 2D and 3D Measurement of Styloid Process Length
    Ab Rahman, Shaifulizan
    Hamizan, Aliea Fatinah Bt Wan
    Takeuchi, Kazuo
    Ohno, Yuzo
    Ismar, Fathin Nabilah Fasya Bt
    Sugita, Yoshihiko
    Maeda, Hatsuhiko
    Alam, Mohammad Khursheed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HARD TISSUE BIOLOGY, 2018, 27 (01) : 51 - 54
  • [10] Comparison of stereoscopic effect between 2D, 3D and pseudo-3D endoscopes
    Yamauchi, Y
    Yamashita, J
    Mochimaru, M
    Fukui, Y
    Yokoyama, K
    [J]. CARS '99: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 1999, 1191 : 1048 - 1048