OIL SPILL TRAJECTORY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2D AND 3D MODELS

被引：0
|
作者：
Soussi, Abdellatif [1 ]
Bersani, Chiara [1 ,2 ]
Tomasoni, Angela Maria [2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Genoa, Italian Ctr Excellence Logist Transport & Infrast, Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, Dept Informat Bioengn Robot & Syst Engn, Genoa, Italy
来源：
URBAN AND MARITIME TRANSPORT XXVII, 2021 | 2021年 / 204卷
关键词：
oil spill; trajectory modelling; GNOME model; environmental impact; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; MEDSLIK-II; RISK; PROBABILITY; SIMULATION; MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORT; POLLUTION; FORECAST; SUPPORT;
D O I：
10.2495/UT210101
中图分类号：
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号：
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要：
Oil spills in the marine environment are a harmful threat to the environment, the population, and the economy. For this reason, it is important to know the trajectory of oil slicks in case of a spill in order to prioritize actions for oil recovery and thus to better protect areas exposed to pollution risk. For this purpose, several oil slick drift models are developed to study the impact of various possible scenarios and to estimate the environmental sensitivity of a maritime and coastal area even before this type of accident occurs. In this context, this paper presents the applications of a two (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) oil spill models, suggested to define the trajectory of the oil slick in a marine environment taking into account different meteorological parameters. The two models have been applied to simulate the oil spill propagation in the case of a collision accident that occurred off Saint-Tropez (France) on 7 October 2018.
引用
收藏
页码：117 / 128
页数：12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] USING 2D AND 3D OIL SPILL TRAJECTORY AND FATE MODELS TO ASSESS THE RISK OF ACCIDENTAL CRUDE OIL RELEASES ALONG THE ENBRIDGE LINE 3 REPLACEMENT PROGRAM PIPELINE
    Horn, Matthew G. S.
    Fontenault, Jeremy M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 2, 2018,
  • [2] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Di Egidio, Angelo
    Zulli, Daniele
    Contento, Alessandro
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2014, 13 (01) : 151 - 162
  • [3] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Angelo Di Egidio
    Daniele Zulli
    Alessandro Contento
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 13 : 151 - 162
  • [4] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Angelo Di Egidio
    Daniele Zulli
    Alessandro Contento
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 13 (01) : 151 - 162
  • [5] Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analyses
    Bholsithi, W.
    Sinthanayothin, C.
    Chintakanon, K.
    Komolpis, R.
    Tharanon, W.
    [J]. 4TH KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 21 (1-2): : 540 - +
  • [6] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D MODELS OF SALINITY NUMERICAL SIMULATION
    Li Chunhui
    Pan Xishan
    Ke Jie
    Dong Xiaotian
    [J]. POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH, 2015, 22 : 26 - 29
  • [7] Comparison between a 2D froth and a cut of 3D froth
    Oger, L
    Richard, P
    Troadec, JP
    Gervois, A
    [J]. POWDERS AND GRAINS 2001, 2001, : 7 - 10
  • [8] Seismic Analysis of the Reef-seawater System: Comparison between 3D and 2D Models
    Bao, Xin
    Liu, Jingbo
    Chen, Su
    Wang, Piguang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (06) : 3109 - 3122
  • [9] Ultrasound propagation in 2D and 3D concrete models -: A quantitative comparison
    Schubert, F
    Köhler, B
    [J]. ANNUAL MEETING 1998 - NONDESTRUCTIVE MATERIALS TESTING: NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING OF WELD JOINTS 70 YEARS LATER, 1997, 63 (1-2): : 549 - 560
  • [10] DYNAMICS OF THE FORCED KARMAN WAKE: COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D MODELS
    Mureithi, Njuki W.
    Xu, Xiaofei
    Baranyi, Laszlo
    Nakamura, Tomomichi
    Kaneko, Shigehiko
    [J]. ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE - 2014, VOL 4, 2014,
12345