Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks

被引:0
|
作者
Angelo Di Egidio [1 ]
Daniele Zulli [1 ]
Alessandro Contento [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil Engineering,Architecture and Environment(DICEAA),University of L’Aquila
关键词
seismic excitation; 3D rigid block; rectangular base; rocking; overturning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P315.9 [工程地震]; TU457 [岩石稳定性分析];
学科分类号
070801 ; 0801 ; 080104 ; 0815 ;
摘要
A three-dimensional rigid body on the shape of a parallelepiped is modelled in order to rock on a side or a vertex of the base,in order to evaluate the seismic response of rigid blocks lying on a horizontal support.The center of mass of the body is considered as eccentric with respect to its geometric center.As seismic input,three Italian recorded accelerograms,with different spectral content,are used.The study is mainly conducted to highlight the differences between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks,with the aim to understand if,in some cases,the use of the 3D model of rigid block is required to obtain safer results.In fact,the outcomes show that in some ranges of the geometrical and mechanical parameters that characterize the excitation and the body,a two-dimensional model,which is not able to consider the 3D rocking on a vertex,can provide unsafe results.In particular,it is found that the overturning process of the three-dimensional block can occur under excitations which are lower than those which overturn a corresponding two-dimensional block.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 162
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Di Egidio, Angelo
    Zulli, Daniele
    Contento, Alessandro
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2014, 13 (01) : 151 - 162
  • [2] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Angelo Di Egidio
    Daniele Zulli
    Alessandro Contento
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 13 : 151 - 162
  • [3] Seismic Analysis of the Reef-seawater System: Comparison between 3D and 2D Models
    Bao, Xin
    Liu, Jingbo
    Chen, Su
    Wang, Piguang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 26 (06) : 3109 - 3122
  • [4] OIL SPILL TRAJECTORY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2D AND 3D MODELS
    Soussi, Abdellatif
    Bersani, Chiara
    Tomasoni, Angela Maria
    [J]. URBAN AND MARITIME TRANSPORT XXVII, 2021, 2021, 204 : 117 - 128
  • [5] Influence of 3D spatial effect of underground structure on the nonlinear seismic response of subway station based on the comparison of 2D and 3D models
    Jin, Liguo
    Du, Liting
    Zhou, Wen
    Chen, Su
    Zhou, Zhenghua
    Zhou, Bengang
    [J]. TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 139
  • [6] Equivalence between 2D and 3D numerical simulations of the seismic response of improved sites
    Papadimitriou, A. G.
    Bouckovalas, G. D.
    Vytiniotis, A. C.
    Bakas, G. J.
    [J]. Numerical Methods in Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, : 809 - 815
  • [7] Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analyses
    Bholsithi, W.
    Sinthanayothin, C.
    Chintakanon, K.
    Komolpis, R.
    Tharanon, W.
    [J]. 4TH KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 21 (1-2): : 540 - +
  • [8] Assembling 2D Blocks into 3D Chips
    Knechtel, Johann
    Markov, Igor L.
    Lienig, Jens
    [J]. ISPD 11: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 ACM/SIGDA INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PHYSICAL DESIGN, 2011, : 81 - 88
  • [9] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D MODELS OF SALINITY NUMERICAL SIMULATION
    Li Chunhui
    Pan Xishan
    Ke Jie
    Dong Xiaotian
    [J]. POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH, 2015, 22 : 26 - 29
  • [10] Therapeutic response differences between 2D and 3D tumor models of magnetic hyperthermia
    Gupta, Ruby
    Sharma, Deepika
    [J]. NANOSCALE ADVANCES, 2021, 3 (13): : 3663 - 3680