Seismic Analysis of the Reef-seawater System: Comparison between 3D and 2D Models

被引:0
|
作者
Bao, Xin [1 ]
Liu, Jingbo [1 ]
Chen, Su [2 ]
Wang, Piguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Earthquake Adm, Inst Geophys, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Reef; seawater; 3D site seismic analysis; seismic ground motion; seismic wave input; artificial boundary; GROUND-MOTION; TOPOGRAPHY; ISLANDS; WAVES;
D O I
10.1080/13632469.2020.1785976
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study established a 3D seismic analysis model for the reef-seawater system, in which the fluid-solid interaction algorithm, the fluid and solid artificial boundaries are adopted for numerical modelling, and the boundary substructure method is used for seismic wave input. On that basis, we conduct a comparative seismic analysis between 2D and 3D models. The results show that the ground motion distributions in the middle reef regions calculated by 2D and 3D models are generally consistent with each other. However, in the areas where the topography changes drastically, the 3D terrain shows an important influence on the local seismic response.
引用
收藏
页码:3109 / 3122
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Di Egidio, Angelo
    Zulli, Daniele
    Contento, Alessandro
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING VIBRATION, 2014, 13 (01) : 151 - 162
  • [2] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Angelo Di Egidio
    Daniele Zulli
    Alessandro Contento
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 13 (01) : 151 - 162
  • [3] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Angelo Di Egidio
    Daniele Zulli
    Alessandro Contento
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 13 : 151 - 162
  • [4] Seismic response analysis of the reef-seawater system under incident SV wave
    Liu, Jingbo
    Bao, Xin
    Wang, Dongyang
    Wang, Piguang
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2019, 180 : 199 - 210
  • [5] OIL SPILL TRAJECTORY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN 2D AND 3D MODELS
    Soussi, Abdellatif
    Bersani, Chiara
    Tomasoni, Angela Maria
    [J]. URBAN AND MARITIME TRANSPORT XXVII, 2021, 2021, 204 : 117 - 128
  • [6] Seismic response analysis of the reef-seawater system under obliquely incident P and SV waves
    Bao, Xin
    Liu, Jingbo
    Li, Shutao
    Wang, Fei
    Wang, Piguang
    [J]. OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 200
  • [7] Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analyses
    Bholsithi, W.
    Sinthanayothin, C.
    Chintakanon, K.
    Komolpis, R.
    Tharanon, W.
    [J]. 4TH KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 21 (1-2): : 540 - +
  • [8] Comparative Analysis Between the 2D and 3D Models of Interstitial Microwave Hyperthermia
    Gas, Piotr
    Kurgan, Eugeniusz
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE COMPUTATIONAL PROBLEMS OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING (CPEE), 2016,
  • [9] COMPARISON OF 2D AND 3D MODELS OF SALINITY NUMERICAL SIMULATION
    Li Chunhui
    Pan Xishan
    Ke Jie
    Dong Xiaotian
    [J]. POLISH MARITIME RESEARCH, 2015, 22 : 26 - 29
  • [10] Comparison between a 2D froth and a cut of 3D froth
    Oger, L
    Richard, P
    Troadec, JP
    Gervois, A
    [J]. POWDERS AND GRAINS 2001, 2001, : 7 - 10