Comparison of common hard tissue cephalometric measurements between computed tomography 3D reconstruction and conventional 2D cephalometric images

被引:37
|
作者
Yitschaky, Oded [1 ]
Redlich, Meir [1 ]
Abed, Yossi [1 ]
Faerman, Marina [2 ]
Casap, Nardy [3 ]
Hiller, Nurith [4 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Orthodont, Hadassah Fac Dent Med, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Lab Bioanthropol & Ancient DNA, Hadassah Fac Dent Med, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Hadassah Fac Dent Med, IL-91120 Jerusalem, Israel
[4] Hadassah Hebrew Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
CT; Cephalometric; Analysis; ACCURACY; LANDMARKS;
D O I
10.2319/031710-157.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare cephalostat two-dimensional (2D) measurements to 3D computed tomography (CT) measurements in order to determine the compatibility of CT landmarks identification for orthodontic purposes. Materials and Methods: Ten human skulls were x-rayed in conventional lateral cephalogram and then scanned with spiral CT. Twenty-eight linear and angular cephalometric measurements were registered on the 2D lateral cephalogram and compared to the same measurement on the 3D CT scan. Significance of the results was determined by t-test for paired differences (P < .05). Results: No difference was found between 2D and 3D images for linear or ratio measurements. As for the angular cephalometric measurements, only the sella turcica dependent measurements, showed significant difference between 2D and 3D. Conclusions: The compatibility of using most of the common orthodontic examined cephalometric measurements on 3D volume rendered image was proven except for the angular measurements that included sella anatomic landmark. (Angle Orthod. 2011;81:11-16.)
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 16
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images
    Zamora, Natalia
    Llamas, Jose M.
    Cibrian, Rosa
    Gandia, Jose L.
    Paredes, Vanessa
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (05) : 856 - 864
  • [2] Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analyses
    Bholsithi, W.
    Sinthanayothin, C.
    Chintakanon, K.
    Komolpis, R.
    Tharanon, W.
    [J]. 4TH KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, 21 (1-2): : 540 - +
  • [3] Comparison of Anthropometric and Cephalometric Measurements Obtained by Stereophotogrammetry and 3D Computed Tomography of the Nose Before Septorhinoplasty
    Aydin, Ali Can
    Karakol, Percin
    Sulhan, Agit
    Erk, Hamdullah
    Bozkurt, Mehmet
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024,
  • [4] Comparison of Computed Tomography Assisted 3D Cephalometric Measurements in Straight Egyptian Arabian and Thoroughbred Horses
    Alshami, Alanoud M.
    Pompermayer, Endrigo
    Troteaga Alvarez, Carla
    Hoey, Seamus
    Ryan, Jackie
    Johnson, Jessica P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DENTISTRY, 2024, 41 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [5] 3D Tibia Reconstruction Using 2D Computed Tomography Images
    Iyoho, Anthony E.
    Young, Jonathan M.
    Volman, Vladislav
    Shelley, David A.
    Ng, Laurel J.
    Wang, Henry
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 2019, 184 (3-4) : 621 - 626
  • [6] Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography cephalometric measurements using a midsagittal projection and conventional two-dimensional cephalometric measurements
    Jung, Pil-Kyo
    Lee, Gung-Chol
    Moon, Cheol-Hyun
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2015, 45 (06) : 282 - 288
  • [7] The relationship between 3D dentofacial photogrammetry measurements and traditional cephalometric measurements
    Castillo, Jose C.
    Gianneschi, Grace
    Azer, Demyana
    Manosudprasit, Amornrut
    Haghi, Arshan
    Bansal, Neetu
    Allareddy, Veerasathpurush
    Masoud, Mohamed I.
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2019, 89 (02) : 275 - 283
  • [8] Cephalometric Landmark Regression with Convolutional Neural Networks on 3D Computed Tomography Data
    D. Lachinov
    A. Getmanskaya
    V. Turlapov
    [J]. Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 2020, 30 : 512 - 522
  • [9] Cephalometric Landmark Regression with Convolutional Neural Networks on 3D Computed Tomography Data
    Lachinov, D.
    Getmanskaya, A.
    Turlapov, V
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION AND IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2020, 30 (03) : 512 - 522
  • [10] Reconstruction of 3D images of internal log characteristics by means of successive 2D log computed tomography images
    Wei, Qiang
    Zhang, Shu Yin
    Chui, Ying Hei
    Leblon, Brigitte
    [J]. HOLZFORSCHUNG, 2009, 63 (05) : 575 - 580