Comparison between 3D and 2D Cephalometric Analyses

被引：0
|
作者：
Bholsithi, W. [1 ]
Sinthanayothin, C. [1 ]
Chintakanon, K. [2 ]
Komolpis, R. [2 ]
Tharanon, W. [2 ]
机构：
[1] NSTDA, Natl Elect & Comp Technol Ctr, 112 Thailand Sci Pk,Phahon Yothin Rd, Klongluang 12120, Pathumthani, Thailand
[2] NSTDA, Adv Dent Technol Ctr, Klongluang 12120, Pathumthani, Thailand
来源：
4TH KUALA LUMPUR INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2 | 2008年 / 21卷 / 1-2期
关键词：
3D Cephalometric Analysis; Simplant; Cone-beam CT;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号：
0831 ;
摘要：
This paper presented 3D cephalometric analysis on DICOM data from I-CAT CT cone-beam machine consisted of averages and standard deviations from 20 Thai males from 19 to 70 year (average 33.53 +/- 14.08 year) and 20 Thai females from 16 to 70 year (average 32.60 +/- 15.37 year). The angular measurements consisted of 49 lateral and 9 frontal measurements while linear measurements consisted of 29 lateral, 3 frontal, and 8 perpendicular measurements. Results in 3D were compared with the corresponding 2D results showing that most midline-to-midline linear measurements and some midline-to-midline angular measurements were not different, while other types of measurements were significantly different. The 3D results will be used in the clinical Ceph3D services as requested by those with interests on cephalometric analysis and anthropology with focus on Thai subjects while the 2D results will be used for comparison with cephalometric analyses from other orthodontists.
引用
收藏
页码：540 / +
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls
    van Vlijmen, O. J. C.
    Maal, T.
    Berge, S. J.
    Bronkhorst, E. M.
    Katsaros, C.
    Kuijpers-Jagtman, A. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 39 (02) : 156 - 160
  • [22] Comparison between 2D and 3D ultrasound in prediction of the oocyte maturity in ICSI
    Hegazy, A., I
    Rezk, A. Y.
    Farag, M. A.
    Altraigey, A. A.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2013, 120 : 363 - 364
  • [23] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Angelo Di Egidio
    Daniele Zulli
    Alessandro Contento
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 13 (01) : 151 - 162
  • [24] Comparison between 2D and 3D numerical modeling of superplastic forming processes
    Hambli, R
    Potiron, A
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 190 (37-38) : 4871 - 4880
  • [25] Comparison between the seismic response of 2D and 3D models of rigid blocks
    Angelo Di Egidio
    Daniele Zulli
    Alessandro Contento
    [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2014, 13 : 151 - 162
  • [26] 2D or 3D?
    Mills, R
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING, 1996, 15 (08): : 4 - 4
  • [27] Cephalometric measurements from 3D reconstructed images compared with conventional 2D images
    Zamora, Natalia
    Llamas, Jose M.
    Cibrian, Rosa
    Gandia, Jose L.
    Paredes, Vanessa
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2011, 81 (05) : 856 - 864
  • [28] A comparison of 2D and 3D simulations of the River Blackwater
    Barrett, Lawrence
    Wright, Nigel G.
    Sterling, Mark
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-ENGINEERING AND COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2011, 164 (04) : 217 - 232
  • [29] Comparison of 2D and 3D images of fractures in a Vertisol
    Moreau, E
    Velde, B
    Terribile, F
    [J]. GEODERMA, 1999, 92 (1-2) : 55 - 72
  • [30] Comparison of random surfaces 2D and 3D parameters
    Pawlus, P.
    Reizer, R.
    [J]. Annals of DAAAM for 2006 & Proceedings of the 17th International DAAAM Symposium: INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING & AUTOMATION: FOCUS ON MECHATRONICS AND ROBOTICS, 2006, : 293 - 294
12345