Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: An application in chicken mortality

被引:34
|
作者
Bermann, Matias [1 ]
Legarra, Andres [2 ]
Hollifield, Mary Kate [1 ]
Masuda, Yutaka [1 ]
Lourenco, Daniela [1 ]
Misztal, Ignacy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] INRA Toulouse, UMR GenPhySE, Castanet Tolosan, France
关键词
accuracy; binary trait; categorical trait; validation of genomic models; GENETIC EVALUATION; DAIRY-CATTLE; INFORMATION; SELECTION; VARIANCE; FEMALES;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12507
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine whether the linear regression (LR) method could be used to validate genomic threshold models. Statistics for the LR method were computed from estimated breeding values (EBVs) using the whole and truncated data sets with variances from the reference and validation populations. The method was tested using simulated and real chicken data sets. The simulated data set included 10 generations of 4,500 birds each; genotypes were available for the last three generations. Each animal was assigned a continuous trait, which was converted to a binary score assuming an incidence of failure of 7%. The real data set included the survival status of 186,596 broilers (mortality rate equal to 7.2%) and genotypes of 18,047 birds. Both data sets were analysed using best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) or single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). The whole data set included all phenotypes available, whereas in the partial data set, phenotypes of the most recent generation were removed. In the simulated data set, the accuracies based on the LR formulas were 0.45 for BLUP and 0.76 for ssGBLUP, whereas the correlations between true breeding values and EBVs (i.e. true accuracies) were 0.37 and 0.65, respectively. The gain in accuracy by adding genomic information was overestimated by 0.09 when using the LR method compared to the true increase in accuracy. However, when the estimated ratio between the additive variance computed based on pedigree only and on pedigree and genomic information was considered, the difference between true and estimated gain was <0.02. Accuracies of BLUP and ssGBLUP with the real data set were 0.41 and 0.47, respectively. This small improvement in accuracy when using ssGBLUP with the real data set was due to population structure and lower heritability. The LR method is a useful tool for estimating improvements in accuracy of EBVs due to the inclusion of genomic information when traditional validation methods ask-fold validation and predictive ability are not applicable.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 13
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficient approximation of reliabilities for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor models with the Algorithm for Proven and Young
    Bermann, Matias
    Lourenco, Daniela
    Misztal, Ignacy
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 100 (01)
  • [42] Application of single-step genomic evaluation using social genetic effect model for growth in pig
    Hong, Joon Ki
    Kim, Young Sin
    Cho, Kyu Ho
    Lee, Deuk Hwan
    Min, Ye Jin
    Cho, Eun Seok
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2019, 32 (12): : 1836 - 1843
  • [43] Application of single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction with a multiple-lactation random regression test-day model for Japanese Holsteins
    Baba, Toshimi
    Gotoh, Yusaku
    Yamaguchi, Satoshi
    Nakagawa, Satoshi
    Abe, Hayato
    Masuda, Yutaka
    Kawahara, Takayoshi
    ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2017, 88 (08) : 1226 - 1231
  • [44] Improving genomic prediction for two Yorkshire populations with a limited size using the single-step method
    Zhou, L.
    Wang, Y.
    Yu, J.
    Yang, H.
    Kang, H.
    Zhang, S.
    Wang, C.
    Liu, J.
    ANIMAL GENETICS, 2019, 50 (04) : 391 - 394
  • [45] The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction
    Howard, Jeremy T.
    Rathje, Tom A.
    Bruns, Caitlyn E.
    Wilson-Wells, Danielle F.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 (11) : 4532 - 4542
  • [46] Bias and accuracy of body weight trait evaluations of an F2 chicken using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP)
    Asadollahi, Hamed
    Mahyari, Saeid Ansari
    Torshizi, Rasoul Vaez
    Emrani, Hossein
    Ehsani, Alireza
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 104 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [47] Bias and accuracy of body weight trait evaluations of an F2 chicken using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP)
    Asadollahi, Hamed
    Mahyari, Saeid Ansari
    Torshizi, Rasoul Vaez
    Emrani, Hossein
    Ehsani, Alireza
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023,
  • [48] A Random Regression Model Based on a Single-Step Method for Improving the Genomic Prediction Accuracy of Residual Feed Intake in Pigs
    Wang, Ye
    Diao, Chenguang
    Kang, Huimin
    Hao, Wenjie
    Mrode, Raphael
    Chen, Junhai
    Liu, Jianfeng
    Zhou, Lei
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 12
  • [49] Use of the linear regression method to evaluate population accuracy of predictions from non-linear models
    Yu, Haipeng
    Fernando, Rohan L.
    Dekkers, Jack C. M.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2024, 15
  • [50] A RAPID, SINGLE-STEP PURIFICATION METHOD FOR IMMUNOGENIC MEMBERS OF THE HSP-70 FAMILY - VALIDATION AND APPLICATION
    NANDAN, D
    DAUBENBERGER, C
    MPIMBAZA, G
    PEARSON, TW
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 1994, 176 (02) : 255 - 263