Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: An application in chicken mortality

被引:34
|
作者
Bermann, Matias [1 ]
Legarra, Andres [2 ]
Hollifield, Mary Kate [1 ]
Masuda, Yutaka [1 ]
Lourenco, Daniela [1 ]
Misztal, Ignacy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] INRA Toulouse, UMR GenPhySE, Castanet Tolosan, France
关键词
accuracy; binary trait; categorical trait; validation of genomic models; GENETIC EVALUATION; DAIRY-CATTLE; INFORMATION; SELECTION; VARIANCE; FEMALES;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12507
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine whether the linear regression (LR) method could be used to validate genomic threshold models. Statistics for the LR method were computed from estimated breeding values (EBVs) using the whole and truncated data sets with variances from the reference and validation populations. The method was tested using simulated and real chicken data sets. The simulated data set included 10 generations of 4,500 birds each; genotypes were available for the last three generations. Each animal was assigned a continuous trait, which was converted to a binary score assuming an incidence of failure of 7%. The real data set included the survival status of 186,596 broilers (mortality rate equal to 7.2%) and genotypes of 18,047 birds. Both data sets were analysed using best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) or single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). The whole data set included all phenotypes available, whereas in the partial data set, phenotypes of the most recent generation were removed. In the simulated data set, the accuracies based on the LR formulas were 0.45 for BLUP and 0.76 for ssGBLUP, whereas the correlations between true breeding values and EBVs (i.e. true accuracies) were 0.37 and 0.65, respectively. The gain in accuracy by adding genomic information was overestimated by 0.09 when using the LR method compared to the true increase in accuracy. However, when the estimated ratio between the additive variance computed based on pedigree only and on pedigree and genomic information was considered, the difference between true and estimated gain was <0.02. Accuracies of BLUP and ssGBLUP with the real data set were 0.41 and 0.47, respectively. This small improvement in accuracy when using ssGBLUP with the real data set was due to population structure and lower heritability. The LR method is a useful tool for estimating improvements in accuracy of EBVs due to the inclusion of genomic information when traditional validation methods ask-fold validation and predictive ability are not applicable.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 13
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Accuracy of indirect predictions based on prediction error covariance from single-step genomic BLUP.
    Lourenco, D.
    Aguilar, I.
    Legarra, A.
    Garcia, A.
    Masuda, Y.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Misztal, I.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 : 141 - 142
  • [32] Evaluation of a multi-line broiler chicken population using a single-step genomic evaluation procedure
    Simeone, R.
    Misztal, I.
    Aguilar, I.
    Vitezica, Z. G.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2012, 129 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [33] Weighted Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction Method Application for Assessing Pigs on Meat Productivity and Reproduction Traits
    Kabanov, Artem
    Melnikova, Ekaterina
    Nikitin, Sergey
    Somova, Maria
    Fomenko, Oleg
    Volkova, Valeria
    Kostyunina, Olga
    Karpushkina, Tatiana
    Martynova, Elena
    Trebunskikh, Elena
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (13):
  • [34] Single-step genome-wide association analyses of claw horn lesions in Holstein cattle using linear and threshold models
    Li, Bingjie
    Barden, Matthew
    Kapsona, Vanessa
    Sanchez-Molano, Enrique
    Anagnostopoulos, Alkiviadis
    Griffiths, Bethany Eloise
    Bedford, Cherril
    Dai, Xiaoxia
    Coffey, Mike
    Psifidi, Androniki
    Oikonomou, Georgios
    Banos, Georgios
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2023, 55 (01)
  • [35] Single-step genome-wide association analyses of claw horn lesions in Holstein cattle using linear and threshold models
    Bingjie Li
    Matthew Barden
    Vanessa Kapsona
    Enrique Sánchez-Molano
    Alkiviadis Anagnostopoulos
    Bethany Eloise Griffiths
    Cherril Bedford
    Xiaoxia Dai
    Mike Coffey
    Androniki Psifidi
    Georgios Oikonomou
    Georgios Banos
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 55
  • [36] Genomic studies of milk-related traits in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) based on single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and random regression models
    Lazaro, Sirlene F.
    Tonhati, Humberto
    Oliveira, Hinayah R.
    Silva, Alessandra A.
    Nascimento, Andre, V
    Santos, Daniel J. A.
    Stefani, Gabriela
    Brito, Luiz F.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (05) : 5768 - 5793
  • [37] Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus
    Lourenco, D. A. L.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Fragomeni, B. O.
    Masuda, Y.
    Aguilar, I.
    Legarra, A.
    Bertrand, J. K.
    Amen, T. S.
    Wang, L.
    Moser, D. W.
    Misztal, I.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (06) : 2653 - 2662
  • [38] Multi-Trait Single-Step GBLUP Improves Accuracy of Genomic Prediction for Carcass Traits Using Yearling Weight and Ultrasound Traits in Hanwoo
    Mehrban, Hossein
    Naserkheil, Masoumeh
    Lee, Deukhwan
    Ibanez-Escriche, Noelia
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 12
  • [39] Single-step genomic evaluation using multitrait random regression model and test-day data
    Koivula, M.
    Stranden, I.
    Poso, J.
    Aamand, G. P.
    Mantysaari, E. A.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2015, 98 (04) : 2775 - 2784
  • [40] Validation of single-step genomic BLUP random regression test-day models and SNP effects analysis on milk yield in French Saanen goats
    Arnal, M.
    Robert-Granie, C.
    Ducrocq, V.
    Larroque, H.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2023, 106 (07) : 4813 - 4824