Genomic studies of milk-related traits in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) based on single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and random regression models

被引:15
|
作者
Lazaro, Sirlene F. [1 ,2 ]
Tonhati, Humberto [2 ]
Oliveira, Hinayah R. [1 ,3 ]
Silva, Alessandra A. [2 ]
Nascimento, Andre, V [2 ]
Santos, Daniel J. A. [4 ]
Stefani, Gabriela [2 ]
Brito, Luiz F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Anim Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ, Coll Agr & Vet Sci, Dept Anim Sci, UNESP, BR-14884900 Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Guelph, Ctr Genet Improvement Livestock, Dept Anim Biosci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Anim & Avian Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
genomics genome-wide association study; lactation curve; longitudinal trait; mastitis; Murrah; SOMATIC-CELL SCORE; PRIMIPAROUS HOLSTEIN CATTLE; ESTIMATE GENETIC-PARAMETERS; WIDE ASSOCIATION; SEQUENCE VARIANTS; BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS; LACTATION CURVES; CANDIDATE GENES; MURRAH BUFFALOS; PHENOTYPIC DATA;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2020-19534
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Genomic selection has been widely implemented in many livestock breeding programs, but it remains incipient in buffalo. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) estimate variance components incorporating genomic information in Murrah buffalo; (2) evaluate the performance of genomic prediction for milk-related traits using single-and multitrait random regression models (RRM) and the single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction approach; and (3) estimate longitudinal SNP effects and candidate genes potentially associated with time-dependent variation in milk, fat, and protein yields, as well as somatic cell score (SCS) in multiple parities. The data used to estimate the genetic parameters consisted of a total of 323,140 test-day records. The average daily heritability estimates were moderate (0.35 +/- 0.02 for milk yield, 0.22 +/- 0.03 for fat yield, 0.42 +/- 0.03 for protein yield, and 0.16 +/- 0.03 for SCS). The highest heritability estimates, considering all traits studied, were observed between 20 and 280 d in milk (DIM). The genetic correlation estimates at different DIM among the evaluated traits ranged from -0.10 (156 to 185 DIM for SCS) to 0.61 (36 to 65 DIM for fat yield). In general, direct selection for any of the traits evaluated is expected to result in indirect genetic gains for milk yield, fat yield, and protein yield but also increase SCS at certain lactation stages, which is undesirable. The predicted RRM coefficients were used to derive the genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for each time point (from 5 to 305 DIM). In general, the tuning parameters evaluated when constructing the hybrid genomic relationship matrices had a small effect on the GEBV accuracy and a greater effect on the bias estimates. The SNP solutions were back-solved from the GEBV predicted from the Legendre random regression coefficients, which were then used to estimate the longitudinal SNP effects (from 5 to 305 DIM). The daily SNP effect for 3 different lactation stages were performed considering 3 different lactation stages for each trait and parity: from 5 to 70, from 71 to 150, and from 151 to 305 DIM. Important genomic regions related to the analyzed traits and parities that explain more than 0.50% of the total additive genetic variance were selected for further analyses of candidate genes. In general, similar potential candidate genes were found between traits, but our results suggest evidence of differential sets of candidate genes underlying the phenotypic expression of the traits across parities. These results contribute to a better understanding of the genetic architecture of milk production traits in dairy buffalo and reinforce the relevance of incorporating genomic information to genetically evaluate longitudinal traits in dairy buffalo. Furthermore, the candidate genes identified can be used as target genes in future functional genomics studies.
引用
收藏
页码:5768 / 5793
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models
    Stranden, I.
    Matilainen, K.
    Aamand, G. P.
    Mantysaari, E. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2017, 134 (03) : 264 - 274
  • [2] Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework
    Baller, Johnna L.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Kuehn, Larry A.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 (06)
  • [3] Genomic prediction of milk-production traits and somatic cell score using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor with random regression test-day model in Thai dairy cattle
    Buaban, S.
    Prempree, S.
    Sumreddee, P.
    Duangjinda, M.
    Masuda, Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (12) : 12713 - 12723
  • [4] Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle
    Naserkheil, Masoumeh
    Lee, Deuk Hwan
    Mehrban, Hossein
    [J]. BMC GENETICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [5] Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle
    Masoumeh Naserkheil
    Deuk Hwan Lee
    Hossein Mehrban
    [J]. BMC Genetics, 21
  • [6] Accuracy of genomic evaluation with weighted single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction for milk production traits, udder type traits, and somatic cell scores in French dairy goats
    Teissier, M.
    Larroque, H.
    Robert-Granie, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 (04) : 3142 - 3154
  • [7] The impact of truncating data on the predictive ability for single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction
    Howard, Jeremy T.
    Rathje, Tom A.
    Bruns, Caitlyn E.
    Wilson-Wells, Danielle F.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2018, 135 (04) : 251 - 262
  • [8] Comparison of Algorithms for Approximation of Accuracies for Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor Models
    Ramos, Pedro Vital Brasil
    Garcia, Andre
    Retallick, Kelli J.
    Bermann, Matias
    Misztal, Ignacy
    Lourenco, Daniela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101
  • [9] Comparison of Algorithms for Approximation of Accuracies for Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor Models
    Ramos, Pedro Vital Brasil
    Garcia, Andre
    Retallick, Kelli J.
    Bermann, Matias
    Misztal, Ignacy
    Lourenco, Daniela
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101 : 16 - 17
  • [10] Genomic selection through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction improves the accuracy of evaluation in Hanwoo cattle
    Park, Mi Na
    Alam, Mahboob
    Kim, Sidong
    Park, Byoungho
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Sung Soo
    [J]. ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2020, 33 (10): : 1544 - 1557