Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: An application in chicken mortality

被引:34
|
作者
Bermann, Matias [1 ]
Legarra, Andres [2 ]
Hollifield, Mary Kate [1 ]
Masuda, Yutaka [1 ]
Lourenco, Daniela [1 ]
Misztal, Ignacy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] INRA Toulouse, UMR GenPhySE, Castanet Tolosan, France
关键词
accuracy; binary trait; categorical trait; validation of genomic models; GENETIC EVALUATION; DAIRY-CATTLE; INFORMATION; SELECTION; VARIANCE; FEMALES;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12507
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine whether the linear regression (LR) method could be used to validate genomic threshold models. Statistics for the LR method were computed from estimated breeding values (EBVs) using the whole and truncated data sets with variances from the reference and validation populations. The method was tested using simulated and real chicken data sets. The simulated data set included 10 generations of 4,500 birds each; genotypes were available for the last three generations. Each animal was assigned a continuous trait, which was converted to a binary score assuming an incidence of failure of 7%. The real data set included the survival status of 186,596 broilers (mortality rate equal to 7.2%) and genotypes of 18,047 birds. Both data sets were analysed using best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) or single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). The whole data set included all phenotypes available, whereas in the partial data set, phenotypes of the most recent generation were removed. In the simulated data set, the accuracies based on the LR formulas were 0.45 for BLUP and 0.76 for ssGBLUP, whereas the correlations between true breeding values and EBVs (i.e. true accuracies) were 0.37 and 0.65, respectively. The gain in accuracy by adding genomic information was overestimated by 0.09 when using the LR method compared to the true increase in accuracy. However, when the estimated ratio between the additive variance computed based on pedigree only and on pedigree and genomic information was considered, the difference between true and estimated gain was <0.02. Accuracies of BLUP and ssGBLUP with the real data set were 0.41 and 0.47, respectively. This small improvement in accuracy when using ssGBLUP with the real data set was due to population structure and lower heritability. The LR method is a useful tool for estimating improvements in accuracy of EBVs due to the inclusion of genomic information when traditional validation methods ask-fold validation and predictive ability are not applicable.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 13
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Improving genomic prediction of growth and wood traits in Eucalyptus using phenotypes from non-genotyped trees by single-step GBLUP
    Cappa, Eduardo P.
    de Lima, Bruno Marco
    da Silva-Junior, Orzenil B.
    Garcia, Carla C.
    Mansfield, Shawn D.
    Grattapaglia, Dario
    PLANT SCIENCE, 2019, 284 : 9 - 15
  • [22] Accuracy of indirect predictions for large datasets based on prediction error covariance of SNP effects from single-step GBLUP
    Garcia, Andre
    Aguilar, Ignacio
    Legarra, Andres
    Miller, Stephen P.
    Tsuruta, Shogo
    Misztal, Ignacy
    Lourenco, Daniela
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 : 6 - 6
  • [23] Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models
    Stranden, I.
    Matilainen, K.
    Aamand, G. P.
    Mantysaari, E. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2017, 134 (03) : 264 - 274
  • [24] A method to obtain exact single-step GBLUP for non-genotyped descendants when the genomic relationship matrix of ancestors is not available
    Dorian J. Garrick
    Rohan L. Fernando
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 54
  • [25] A method to obtain exact single-step GBLUP for non-genotyped descendants when the genomic relationship matrix of ancestors is not available
    Garrick, Dorian J.
    Fernando, Rohan L.
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2022, 54 (01)
  • [26] Identification of genomic regions related to age at first calving and first calving interval in water buffalo using single-step GBLUP
    de Araujo Neto, Francisco Ribeiro
    Takada, Luciana
    dos Santos, Daniel Jordan Abreu
    Aspilcueta-Borquis, Rusbel Raul
    Cardoso, Diercles Francisco
    do Nascimento, Andre Vieira
    Leao, Karen Martins
    de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes
    Tonhati, Humberto
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2020, 55 (11) : 1565 - 1572
  • [27] Comparison of Algorithms for Approximation of Accuracies for Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor Models
    Ramos, Pedro Vital Brasil
    Garcia, Andre
    Retallick, Kelli J.
    Bermann, Matias
    Misztal, Ignacy
    Lourenco, Daniela
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101
  • [28] Comparison of Algorithms for Approximation of Accuracies for Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor Models
    Ramos, Pedro Vital Brasil
    Garcia, Andre
    Retallick, Kelli J.
    Bermann, Matias
    Misztal, Ignacy
    Lourenco, Daniela
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 101 : 16 - 17
  • [29] Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework
    Baller, Johnna L.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Kuehn, Larry A.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 (06)
  • [30] Genetic evaluations in cattle using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor
    Amaya Martinez, Alejandro
    Martinez Sarmiento, Rodrigo
    Ceron-Munoz, Mario
    REVISTA CORPOICA-CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGIA AGROPECUARIA, 2020, 21 (01):