Bias and accuracy of body weight trait evaluations of an F2 chicken using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP)

被引:0
|
作者
Asadollahi, Hamed [1 ]
Mahyari, Saeid Ansari [1 ]
Torshizi, Rasoul Vaez [2 ]
Emrani, Hossein [3 ]
Ehsani, Alireza [2 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Technol IUT, Coll Agr, Dept Anim Sci, Esfahan 8415683111, Iran
[2] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Anim Sci, Tehran, Iran
[3] Agr Res Educ & Extens Org AREEO, Anim Sci Res Inst Iran, Karaj 31585, Iran
关键词
SNP; MAF; BLUP; ssGBLUP; F2; chicken; GENETIC-PARAMETERS; WIDE ASSOCIATION; COMPLEX TRAITS; SELECTION; POPULATION; GROWTH; INFORMATION; PEDIGREE; HOLSTEIN;
D O I
10.1139/cjas-2023-00091
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objectives of this study were (i) to compare the accuracy and bias of estimates of breeding values for body weight (BW) at 2-7 weeks of age using pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) methods, and (ii) to determine the best level of minor allele frequencies (MAFs) for pre-selection of SNPs for genomic prediction (GP). Records of 488 F2 broiler chickens obtained from crossbreeding of fast-growing Arian chickens and slow-growing Iranian native chickens at 2-7 weeks of age were used. Samples were genotyped using Illumina Chicken 60K BeadChip. To investigate the effect of MAFs on the accuracy of prediction, 48 379 quality-controlled SNPs were grouped into five subgroups with MAF bins 0.05-0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, 0.3-0.4, and 0.4-0.5. Our results confirmed the superiority of ssGBLUP compared to traditional BLUP methodology. The average accuracy of GP improved by 59.03%, 220.34%, 0.46%, 5.61%, 0.45%, and 2.73% using ssGBLUP compared to BLUP for BW at 2-7 weeks of age, respectively. Depending on the age group, using a subset of SNPs with a specific MAF bin compared to all SNPs resulted in a remarkable improvement of GP accuracy for the observed traits.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Bias and accuracy of body weight trait evaluations of an F2 chicken using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP)
    Asadollahi, Hamed
    Mahyari, Saeid Ansari
    Torshizi, Rasoul Vaez
    Emrani, Hossein
    Ehsani, Alireza
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 104 (01) : 51 - 58
  • [2] Genetic evaluations in cattle using the single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor
    Amaya Martinez, Alejandro
    Martinez Sarmiento, Rodrigo
    Ceron-Munoz, Mario
    REVISTA CORPOICA-CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGIA AGROPECUARIA, 2020, 21 (01):
  • [3] Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle
    Naserkheil, Masoumeh
    Lee, Deuk Hwan
    Mehrban, Hossein
    BMC GENETICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [4] Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle
    Masoumeh Naserkheil
    Deuk Hwan Lee
    Hossein Mehrban
    BMC Genetics, 21
  • [5] Using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction to improve the efficiency of genetic evaluation on body weight in Macrobrachium rosenbergii
    Liu, Junyu
    Yang, Guoliang
    Kong, Jie
    Xia, Zhenglong
    Sui, Juan
    Tang, Qiongying
    Luo, Kun
    Dai, Ping
    Lu, Xia
    Meng, Xianhong
    Luan, Sheng
    AQUACULTURE, 2020, 528
  • [6] Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework
    Baller, Johnna L.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Kuehn, Larry A.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 98 (06)
  • [7] Genomic selection through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction improves the accuracy of evaluation in Hanwoo cattle
    Park, Mi Na
    Alam, Mahboob
    Kim, Sidong
    Park, Byoungho
    Lee, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Sung Soo
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2020, 33 (10): : 1544 - 1557
  • [8] Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices
    Lourenco, D. A. L.
    Tsuruta, S.
    Fragomeni, B. O.
    Chen, C. Y.
    Herring, W. O.
    Misztal, I.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 (03) : 909 - 919
  • [9] Solving efficiently large single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction models
    Stranden, I.
    Matilainen, K.
    Aamand, G. P.
    Mantysaari, E. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2017, 134 (03) : 264 - 274
  • [10] The impact of selective genotyping on the response to selection using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction
    Howard, Jeremy T.
    Rathje, Tom A.
    Bruns, Caitlyn E.
    Wilson-Wells, Danielle F.
    Kachman, Stephen D.
    Spangler, Matthew L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 96 (11) : 4532 - 4542