Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose4™

被引:24
|
作者
Laqmani, Azien [1 ]
Avanesov, Maxim [1 ]
Butscheidt, Sebastian [1 ]
Kurfuerst, Maximilian [1 ]
Sehner, Susanne [2 ]
Schmidt-Holtz, Jakob [1 ]
Derlin, Thorsten [1 ]
Behzadi, Cyrus [1 ]
Nagel, Hans D. [3 ]
Adam, Gerhard [1 ]
Regier, Marc [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol & Nucl Med, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Med Biometry & Epidemiol, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[3] Sci & Technol Radiol, Fritz Reuter Weg 5f, D-21244 Buchholz, Germany
关键词
Computed tomography; Radiation dose reduction; Image quality; Iterative reconstruction; Chest; RADIATION-DOSE REDUCTION; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; AVAILABLE OPTIONS; EXPOSURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.09.001
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare both image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT (smSv-CT) using filtered back projection (FBP) and the two different iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose(4)(TM) Materials and methods: This institutional review board approved study was based on retrospective interpretation of clinically indicated acquired data. The requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. 81 patients with suspected pneumonia underwent smSv-CT (Brilliance iCT, Philips Healthcare; mean effective dose: 0.86 +/- 0.2 mSv). Data were reconstructed using FBP and two different IR techniques iDose(4)(TM) and IMR (Philips Healthcare) at various iteration levels. Objective image noise (OIN) was measured. Two experienced readers independently assessed all images for image noise, image appearance and visibility of normal anatomic and abnormal findings. A random intercept model was used for statistical analysis. Results: Compared to FBP and iDose(4)(TM) IMR reduced OIN up to 88% and 72%, respectively (p <0.001). A mild blotchy image appearance was seen in IMR images, affecting diagnostic confidence. iDose(4)(TM) images provided satisfactory to good image quality for visibility of normal and abnormal findings and were superior to FBP (p < 0.001). IMR images were significantly inferior for visibility of normal structures compared to iDose(4)(TM) while being superior for visibility of abnormal findings except for reticular pattern (p < 0.001). Conclusion: IMR results for visibility of normal and abnormal lung findings are heterogeneous, indicating that IMR may not represent a priority technique for clinical routine. iDose(4)(TM) represents a suitable method for evaluation of lung tissue at submillisievert chest CT. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1971 / 1979
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Abdominal 4DCT Image Quality/Visibility Between Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) and Iterative Reconstruction (iDose4)
    Shen, S.
    Sullivan, R.
    Schneider, C.
    Popple, R.
    Jacob, R.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [2] Submillisievert Chest CT With Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Techniques
    Padole, Atul
    Singh, Sarabjeet
    Ackman, Jeanne B.
    Wu, Carol
    Do, Synho
    Pourjabbar, Sarvenaz
    Khawaja, Ranish Deedar Ali
    Otrakji, Alexi
    Digumarthy, Subba
    Shepard, Jo-Anne
    Kalra, Mannudeep
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (04) : 772 - 781
  • [3] Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) in MDCT Below 2 mSv for the Detection of Urinary Calculi: Diagnostic Accuracy and Image Quality in Comparison to Filtered Back-Projection and 4th Generation Iterative Reconstruction (iDose4)
    Schmidt-Holtz, Jakob
    Laqmani, Azien
    Butscheidt, Sebastian
    Kurfuerst, Max
    Avanesov, Maxim
    Behzadi, Cyrus
    Spink, Clemens
    Veldhoen, Simon
    Nagel, Hans Dieter
    Adam, Gerhard
    Regier, Marc
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2018, 190 (07): : 630 - 636
  • [4] Computed Tomography (CT) of the Chest at Less Than 1 mSv: An Ongoing Prospective Clinical Trial of Chest CT at Submillisievert Radiation Doses with Iterative Model Image Reconstruction and iDose4 Technique
    Khawaja, Ranish Deedar Ali
    Singh, Sarabjeet
    Gilman, Matthew
    Sharma, Amita
    Do, Synho
    Pourjabbar, Sarvenaz
    Padole, Atul
    Lira, Diego
    Brown, Kevin
    Shepard, Jo-Anne O.
    Kalra, Mannudeep K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2014, 38 (04) : 613 - 619
  • [5] Comparison study of image quality between filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction algorithm for dose reduction in chest CT
    Son, Junyoung
    Lee, Donghoon
    Jeon, Pil-Hyun
    Choi, Sunghoon
    Kim, Hyemi
    Kim, Hee-Joung
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON MEDICAL IMAGING IN ASIA 2019, 2019, 11050
  • [6] CT of Urolithiasis: Comparison of Image Quality and Diagnostic Confidence Using Filtered Back Projection and Iterative Reconstruction Techniques
    Hansmann, Jan
    Schoenberg, Gita M.
    Brix, Gunnar
    Henzler, Thomas
    Meyer, Mathias
    Attenberger, Ulrike I.
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    Fink, Christian
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2013, 20 (09) : 1162 - 1167
  • [7] Comparison of Knowledge-based Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) with Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction (iDose4) Techniques for Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinomas Using Computed Tomography
    Kulkarni, Chinmay Bhimaji
    Pullara, Sreekumar Karumathil
    Prabhu, Nirmal Kumar
    Patel, Sunil
    Suresh, Aarathi
    Moorthy, Srikanth
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 : S29 - S36
  • [8] ?Image quality evaluation of the Precise image CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm compared to Filtered Back-projection and iDose4: a phantom study at different dose levels?
    Barca, Patrizio
    Domenichelli, Sara
    Golfieri, Rita
    Pierotti, Luisa
    Spagnoli, Lorenzo
    Tomasi, Silvia
    Strigari, Lidia
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 106
  • [9] Low-Dose Computed Tomography of the Chest Using Iterative Reconstruction Versus Filtered Back Projection: Comparison of Image Quality
    Lee, Youkyung
    Jin, Kwang Nam
    Lee, Nyoung Keun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (05) : 512 - 517
  • [10] Pediatric Head CT Image Quality With Iterative Reconstruction Versus Filtered Back Projection
    Oberle, R.
    Kim, E.
    Wu, I.
    Ho, C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2012, 198 (05)