?Image quality evaluation of the Precise image CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm compared to Filtered Back-projection and iDose4: a phantom study at different dose levels?

被引:4
|
作者
Barca, Patrizio [1 ,4 ]
Domenichelli, Sara [1 ]
Golfieri, Rita [3 ]
Pierotti, Luisa [1 ]
Spagnoli, Lorenzo [1 ,2 ]
Tomasi, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Strigari, Lidia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Med Phys, IRCCS Azienda Osped, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Med Phys Specializat Sch, Alma Master Studiorium, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Radiol Addomino Pelv Diagnost & Interventist, IRCCS Azienda Osped, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Bologna, IRCCS Azienda Osped, Bologna, Italy
关键词
Deep learning CT image reconstruction; Philips Precise Image; Image quality; Abdominal protocol; STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; NOISE-POWER SPECTRUM; ABDOMINAL CT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CHEST CT; REDUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; STANDARD; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.102517
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To characterize the performance of the Precise Image (PI) deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm for abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) imaging.Methods: CT images of the Catphan-600 phantom (equipped with an external annulus) were acquired using an abdominal protocol at four dose levels and reconstructed using FBP, iDose4 (levels 2,5) and PI ('Soft Tissue' definition, levels 'Sharper','Sharp','Standard','Smooth','Smoother'). Image noise, image non-uniformity, noise power spectrum (NPS), target transfer function (TTF), detectability index (d'), CT numbers accuracy and image histograms were analyzed.Results: The behavior of the PI algorithm depended strongly on the selected level of reconstruction. The phantom analysis suggested that the PI image noise decreased linearly by varying the level of reconstruction from Sharper to Smoother, expressing a noise reduction up to 80% with respect to FBP. Additionally, the non-uniformity decreased, the histograms became narrower, and d' values increased as PI reconstruction levels changed from Sharper to Smoother. PI had no significant impact on the average CT number of different contrast objects. The conventional FBP NPS was deeply altered only by Smooth and Smoother levels of reconstruction. Furthermore, spatial resolution was found to be dose-and contrast-dependent, but in each analyzed condition it was greater than or comparable to FBP and iDose4 TTFs.Conclusions: The PI algorithm can reduce image noise with respect to FBP and iDose4; spatial resolution, CT numbers and image uniformity are generally preserved by the algorithm but changes in NPS for the Smooth and Smoother levels need to be considered in protocols implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study
    Greffier, Joel
    Hamard, Aymeric
    Pereira, Fabricio
    Barrau, Corinne
    Pasquier, Hugo
    Beregi, Jean Paul
    Frandon, Julien
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (07) : 3951 - 3959
  • [2] Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study
    Joël Greffier
    Aymeric Hamard
    Fabricio Pereira
    Corinne Barrau
    Hugo Pasquier
    Jean Paul Beregi
    Julien Frandon
    [J]. European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 3951 - 3959
  • [3] CT coronary angiography: Image quality with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction compared with filtered back-projection
    Wang, R.
    Schoepf, U. J.
    Wu, R.
    Gibbs, K. P.
    Yu, W.
    Li, M.
    Zhang, Z.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 68 (03) : 272 - 278
  • [4] Comparison of image quality and visibility of normal and abnormal findings at submillisievert chest CT using filtered back projection, iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and iDose4™
    Laqmani, Azien
    Avanesov, Maxim
    Butscheidt, Sebastian
    Kurfuerst, Maximilian
    Sehner, Susanne
    Schmidt-Holtz, Jakob
    Derlin, Thorsten
    Behzadi, Cyrus
    Nagel, Hans D.
    Adam, Gerhard
    Regier, Marc
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (11) : 1971 - 1979
  • [5] Study on an Improved Filtered Back-projection Image Reconstruction Algorithm Combined with Wavelet Denoising
    Ren, Zhong
    Liu, Guodong
    Huang, Zhen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PHOTOELECTRONIC DETECTION AND IMAGING 2013: INFRARED IMAGING AND APPLICATIONS, 2013, 8907
  • [6] Comparison of Iterative Model Reconstruction versus Filtered Back-Projection in Pediatric Emergency Head CT: Dose, Image Quality, and Image-Reconstruction Times
    Southard, R. N.
    Bardo, D. M. E.
    Temkit, M. H.
    Thorkelson, M. A.
    Augustyn, R. A.
    Martinot, C. A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2019, 40 (05) : 866 - 871
  • [7] Comparison of two versions of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on CT image quality and dose reduction: A phantom study
    Greffier, Joel
    Dabli, Djamel
    Frandon, Julien
    Hamard, Aymeric
    Belaouni, Asmaa
    Akessoul, Philippe
    Fuamba, Yannick
    Le Roy, Julien
    Guiu, Boris
    Beregi, Jean-Paul
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (10) : 5743 - 5755
  • [8] Comparison study of image quality between filtered back projection and iterative reconstruction algorithm for dose reduction in chest CT
    Son, Junyoung
    Lee, Donghoon
    Jeon, Pil-Hyun
    Choi, Sunghoon
    Kim, Hyemi
    Kim, Hee-Joung
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON MEDICAL IMAGING IN ASIA 2019, 2019, 11050
  • [9] Task-based characterization of a deep learning image reconstruction and comparison with filtered back-projection and a partial model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: A phantom study
    Racine, Damien
    Becce, Fabio
    Viry, Anais
    Monnin, Pascal
    Thomsen, Brian
    Verdun, Francis R.
    Rotzinger, David C.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 76 : 28 - 37
  • [10] Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal multidetector CT at different tube voltages: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in a phantom study
    Hye Joo Park
    Seo-Youn Choi
    Ji Eun Lee
    Sanghyeok Lim
    Min Hee Lee
    Boem Ha Yi
    Jang Gyu Cha
    Ji Hye Min
    Bora Lee
    Yunsub Jung
    [J]. European Radiology, 2022, 32 : 3974 - 3984