?Image quality evaluation of the Precise image CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm compared to Filtered Back-projection and iDose4: a phantom study at different dose levels?

被引:4
|
作者
Barca, Patrizio [1 ,4 ]
Domenichelli, Sara [1 ]
Golfieri, Rita [3 ]
Pierotti, Luisa [1 ]
Spagnoli, Lorenzo [1 ,2 ]
Tomasi, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Strigari, Lidia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Med Phys, IRCCS Azienda Osped, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Med Phys Specializat Sch, Alma Master Studiorium, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Radiol Addomino Pelv Diagnost & Interventist, IRCCS Azienda Osped, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Bologna, IRCCS Azienda Osped, Bologna, Italy
关键词
Deep learning CT image reconstruction; Philips Precise Image; Image quality; Abdominal protocol; STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; NOISE-POWER SPECTRUM; ABDOMINAL CT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; CHEST CT; REDUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; STANDARD; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.102517
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To characterize the performance of the Precise Image (PI) deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm for abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) imaging.Methods: CT images of the Catphan-600 phantom (equipped with an external annulus) were acquired using an abdominal protocol at four dose levels and reconstructed using FBP, iDose4 (levels 2,5) and PI ('Soft Tissue' definition, levels 'Sharper','Sharp','Standard','Smooth','Smoother'). Image noise, image non-uniformity, noise power spectrum (NPS), target transfer function (TTF), detectability index (d'), CT numbers accuracy and image histograms were analyzed.Results: The behavior of the PI algorithm depended strongly on the selected level of reconstruction. The phantom analysis suggested that the PI image noise decreased linearly by varying the level of reconstruction from Sharper to Smoother, expressing a noise reduction up to 80% with respect to FBP. Additionally, the non-uniformity decreased, the histograms became narrower, and d' values increased as PI reconstruction levels changed from Sharper to Smoother. PI had no significant impact on the average CT number of different contrast objects. The conventional FBP NPS was deeply altered only by Smooth and Smoother levels of reconstruction. Furthermore, spatial resolution was found to be dose-and contrast-dependent, but in each analyzed condition it was greater than or comparable to FBP and iDose4 TTFs.Conclusions: The PI algorithm can reduce image noise with respect to FBP and iDose4; spatial resolution, CT numbers and image uniformity are generally preserved by the algorithm but changes in NPS for the Smooth and Smoother levels need to be considered in protocols implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient radiation exposure and image quality evaluation with the use of iDose4 iterative reconstruction algorithm in chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations
    Ploussi, Agapi
    Alexopoulou, Efthymia
    Economopoulos, Nikolaos
    Argentos, Stylianos I.
    Tsitsia, Vasiliki
    Arapakis, Ioannis
    Kordolaimi, Sofia
    Seimenis, Ioannis
    Efstathopoulos, Efstathios P.
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2014, 158 (04) : 399 - 405
  • [22] Comparison of Image Noise in Dual Energy CT Images Reconstructed Using Filtered Back-Projection, Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction, and Deep Learning Methods
    Prakash, P.
    Nett, B.
    Tang, J.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E521 - E521
  • [23] Impact of an artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for CT on image quality and potential dose reduction: A phantom study
    Greffier, Joel
    Si-Mohamed, Salim
    Frandon, Julien
    Loisy, Maeliss
    de Oliveira, Fabien
    Beregi, Jean Paul
    Dabli, Djamel
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (08) : 5052 - 5063
  • [24] Evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in CT colonography: Comparison of low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection
    Koichi Nagata
    Masanori Fujiwara
    Hidenori Kanazawa
    Tomohiro Mogi
    Nao Iida
    Toru Mitsushima
    Alan T. Lefor
    Hideharu Sugimoto
    [J]. European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 221 - 229
  • [25] Preserving image texture while reducing radiation dose with a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in chest CT: A phantom study
    Franck, Caro
    Zhang, Guozhi
    Deak, Paul
    Zanca, Federica
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 81 : 86 - 93
  • [26] Evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in CT colonography: Comparison of low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection
    Nagata, Koichi
    Fujiwara, Masanori
    Kanazawa, Hidenori
    Mogi, Tomohiro
    Iida, Nao
    Mitsushima, Toru
    Lefor, Alan T.
    Sugimoto, Hideharu
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (01) : 221 - 229
  • [27] Comparative assessment of noise properties for two deep learning CT image reconstruction techniques and filtered back projection
    Kawashima, Hiroki
    Ichikawa, Katsuhiro
    Takata, Tadanori
    Seto, Issei
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (10) : 6359 - 6367
  • [28] Effect of a new deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for abdominal computed tomography imaging on image quality and dose reduction compared with two iterative reconstruction algorithms: a phantom study
    Greffier, Joel
    Dabli, Djamel
    Hamard, Aymeric
    Belaouni, Asmaa
    Akessoul, Philippe
    Frandon, Julien
    Beregi, Jean-Paul
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 12 (01) : 229 - +
  • [29] Patient dose and image quality in low-dose abdominal CT: a comparison between iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection
    Kataria, Bharti
    Smedby, Orjan
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2013, 54 (05) : 540 - 548
  • [30] Evaluation of deep-learning image reconstruction for chest CT examinations at two different dose levels
    Svalkvist, Angelica
    Fagman, Erika
    Vikgren, Jenny
    Ku, Sara
    Diniz, Micael Oliveira
    Norrlund, Rauni Rossi
    Johnsson, Ase A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 24 (03):