Comparison of detector performance in small 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams using a Versa HD accelerator

被引:12
|
作者
Denia, Paula Monasor [1 ]
Castellet Garcia, Maria del Carmen [1 ]
Manjon Garcia, Carla [1 ]
Quiros Higueras, Juan David [1 ]
Blancas, Noelia de Marco [1 ]
Alandi, Jorge Bonaque [1 ]
Juan Senabre, Xavier Jordi [1 ]
Serra, Agustin Santos [1 ]
Lopez-Tarjuelo, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Consorcio Hosp Prov Castellon, Serv Radiofis & Protecc Radiol, Castellon De La Plana, Spain
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
UNFLATTENED PHOTON BEAMS; OUTPUT FACTOR MEASUREMENTS; FILTER FREE BEAMS; MONTE-CARLO; DOSIMETRIC PROPERTIES; SMALL FIELDS; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; FORMALISM; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0213253
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
1. Background & purpose Investigate the applicability of a series of detectors in small field dosimetry and the possible differences between their responses to FF and FFF beams. This work extends upon the series of detectors used by other authors to also include metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) detectors and radiochromic film. We also included a later correction of output factors (OFs) recommended by the recently published IAEA's code of practice TRS 483 on dosimetry of small static fields used in external beam radiotherapy. 2. Materials & methods The OFs, profiles, and PDDs of 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams were measured with 11 different detectors using field sizes between 0.6 x 0.6 cm(2) and 10 x 10 cm(2). 3. Results The OFs of the FFF beams were lower than those of the FF beams for field sizes larger than 3 x 3 cm(2) but higher for field sizes smaller than 3 x 3 cm(2). After applying the IAEA's TRS 483 corrections, the final OFs were compatible with our initial results when considering uncertainties involved. Small-volume detectors are preferable for measuring the penumbra of these small fields where this attribute is higher in the crossline direction than in the inline direction. The R-100 of equivalent-quality FFF beams was higher compared to the corresponding flattened beams. 4. Conclusions We observed no difference for the dose responses between 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams for any of the detectors. OF results, profiles and PDDs were clearly consistent with the previously published literature regarding the Versa HD linac. Correcting our first OFs, taken as ratio of detector charges, with the IAEA's TRS 483 corrections to obtain the final OFs, did not make the former significantly different.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Small field output factor measurements: a detector comparison for Versa HD 6 MV and 6 MV FFF beams.
    Monasor Denia, P.
    Castellet Garcia, M. C.
    Manjon Garcia, C.
    Lopez Tarjuelo, J.
    Juan Senabre, X. J.
    Quiros Higueras, J. D.
    De Marco Blancas, N.
    Bonaque Alandi, J.
    Montenegro Iglesias, N.
    Santos Serra, A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S920 - S921
  • [2] Dosimetric Comparison of SBRT VMAT Treatment Plans Generated for 6 MV, 6 MV FFF, and 10 MV FFF Photon Beams
    Wilson, D.
    Wang, B.
    Dunlap, N.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3404 - 3404
  • [3] Properties of IBA Razor Nano Chamber in small-field radiation therapy using 6MV FF, 6 MV FFF, and 10 MV FFF photon beams
    Partanen, Mari
    Niemela, Jarkko
    Ojala, Jarkko
    Keyrilainen, Jani
    Kapanen, Mika
    [J]. ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (11) : 1419 - 1424
  • [4] Clinical advantages of using unflattened 6-MV and 10-MV photon beams generated by the medical accelerator Elekta Versa HD based on their dosimetric parameters in comparison to conventional beams
    Baic, Blazej
    Kozlowska, Beata
    Kwiatkowski, Robert
    Dybek, Marcin
    [J]. NUKLEONIKA, 2019, 64 (03) : 77 - 86
  • [5] Surface Dose and Build-Up Dose Comparison of 6MV and 10MV Flattened with 6MV FFF and 10MV FFF Photon Beams with Different Detectors
    Nambiraj, Arunai
    Sigamani, Ashokkumar
    Kaviarasu, K.
    Rajesh, T.
    Karthikeyan, S.
    Subramanian, Narayanan
    Meerza, Kazem
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3502 - 3502
  • [6] Detector Selection Impact on Small-Field Dosimetry of Collecting Beam Data Measurements among Versa HD 6 MV FFF Beams: A Multi-Institutional Variability Analysis
    Ceylan, Cemile
    Gungor, Boran
    Yesil, Abdullah
    Gungor, Sinem
    Inal, Serpil Yondem
    Kara, Esil
    Konuk, Aykut
    Ozden, Ozcan
    Kara, Ozgur
    Avci, Volkan
    Baser, Tamer
    Ugur, Timur
    Saglam, Yucel
    Can, Sumeyra
    Durmus, Ismail Faruk
    [J]. TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2024, 39 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [7] 10 MV FFF Or 6 MV FFF for Lung SBRT Planning
    Balik, S.
    Qi, P.
    Magnelli, A.
    Videtic, G.
    Stephans, K.
    Zhuang, T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E336 - E336
  • [8] Verification for small fields of a 6 MV FFF beam model of a varian EDGE accelerator
    Cui, Congwu
    Liu, Zhengfeng
    Therrien, Pierre
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (08) : 4385 - 4385
  • [9] Dosimetric Comparison Between 10MV-FFF and 6MV-FFF for Lung SBRT
    Durmus, I. F.
    Atalay, E. D.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TURKISH PHYSICAL SOCIETY 32ND INTERNATIONAL PHYSICS CONGRESS (TPS32), 2017, 1815
  • [10] Scatter Factors Comparison of 6MV FFF and Energy Matched 6MV EqFFF
    Sigamani, Ashokkumar
    Nambiraji, Arunai
    Sinha, S. N.
    Yadav, Girigesh
    Rajesh, T.
    Raman, Kothanda
    Kaviarasu, K.
    Narayanan, S.
    Meerza, Kazem
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3494 - 3495