Ion recombination corrections of ionization chambers in flattening filter-free photon radiation

被引:29
|
作者
Wang, Yuenan [1 ]
Easterling, Stephen B. [1 ]
Ting, Joseph Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Melbourne Canc Ctr, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA
来源
关键词
flattening filter free; ion recombination; two-voltage technique; P-ion; ionization chamber; MODULATED ARC THERAPY; STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY; REFERENCE DOSIMETRY; ELECTRON-BEAMS; ACCELERATOR;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3758
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The flattening filter free (FFF) X-rays can provide much higher dose rate at the treatment target compared to the conventional flattened X-rays. However, the substantial increase of dose rate for FFF beams may affect the ion recombination correction factor, which is required for accurate measurements using ionization chambers in clinical dosimetry. The purpose of this work is to investigate the ion recombination of three types of commonly used ion chambers (Farmer, PinPoint and plane-parallel) in the FFF photon radiation. Both 6 MV and 10 MV flattened and FFF beams were fully commissioned on a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. The ion recombination correction factor, P-ion, was determined using the two-voltage technique for a 0.6 cc Farmer chamber, a 0.015 cc PinPoint chamber, and a 0.02 cc parallel-plate chamber at different source-to-axis distances (SAD) in a solid water phantom or water tank phantom at a depth of 10 cm in a 10 x 10 cm(2) field. Good repeatability of measurements was demonstrated. Less than 1% difference in Pion between the flattened and FFF photons for all three ion chambers was observed. At a SAD of 100 cm and a depth of 10 cm for a 10 x 10 cm(2) field, P-ion for the Farmer chamber was 1.004 and 1.008 for the 6 MV flattened and FFF beams, respectively. At the same setup using the Farmer chamber, P-ion was 1.002 and 1.015 for the 10 MV flattened and FFF beams, respectively. All P-ion results for the Farmer, PinPoint, or parallel plate chamber in the 6 MV and 10 MV flattened and FFF beams were within 2% from the unity (1 <= P-ion < 1.02). The Pion ratio of the FFF to flattened beams was 0.99 similar to 1.01 for both 6 MV and 10 MV photons. The ion recombination effect of the Farmer, PinPoint, and plane-parallel chamber in the FFF beams is not substantially different from that in the conventional flattened beams.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:262 / 268
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Flattening filter-free linac improves treatment delivery efficiency in stereotactic body radiation therapy
    Prendergast, Brendan M.
    Fiveash, John B.
    Popple, Richard A.
    Clark, Grant M.
    Thomas, Evan M.
    Minnich, Douglas J.
    Jacob, Rojymon
    Spencer, Sharon A.
    Bonner, James A.
    Dobelbower, Michael C.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (03): : 64 - 71
  • [42] Comparison between flattening filter and flattening filter-free photon beams in head and neck cancer patients using volumetric modulated arc therapy technique
    Mahmoud Mohamed Alfishawy
    Khaled Mohamed Elshahat
    Amr Ismail Kany
    Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2025, 64 (1) : 67 - 76
  • [43] Dosimetric properties of a flattening filter-free 6-MV photon beam: A Monte Carlo study
    Mesbahi A.
    Mehnati P.
    Keshtkar A.
    Farajollahi A.
    Radiation Medicine, 2007, 25 (7): : 315 - 324
  • [44] Clinically relevant investigation of flattening filter-free skin dose
    Guy, Christopher L.
    Karki, Kishor
    Sharma, Manju
    Kim, Siyong
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (06): : 140 - 148
  • [45] Radiobiological comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) beam in rat laryngeal tissue
    Aras, Serhat
    Tanzer, Ihsan Oguz
    Sayir, Neslihan
    Keles, Mevlut Sait
    Ozgeris, Fatma Betul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2021, 97 (02) : 249 - 255
  • [46] Three-dimensional dose comparison of flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free (FFF) radiation therapy by using NIPAM gel dosimetry
    Yao, Chun-Hsu
    Chang, Tung-Hao
    Lin, Chia-Chi
    Lai, Yuan-Chun
    Chen, Chin-Hsing
    Chang, Yuan-Jen
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (02):
  • [47] Comparison of radiotherapy techniques with flattening filter and flattening filter-free in lung radiotherapy according to the treatment volume size
    Arslan, Alaettin
    Sengul, Burak
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [48] Comparison of radiotherapy techniques with flattening filter and flattening filter-free in lung radiotherapy according to the treatment volume size
    Alaettin Arslan
    Burak Sengul
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [49] Monte Carlo study on a flattening filter-free 18-MV photon beam of a medical linear accelerator
    Mesbahi, Asghar
    Nejad, Farshad Seyed
    RADIATION MEDICINE, 2008, 26 (06): : 331 - 336
  • [50] Monte Carlo study of a flattening filter-free 6 MV photon beam using the BEAMnrc code.
    Kajaria, Ankit
    Sharma, Neeraj
    Sharma, Shiru
    Pradhan, Satyajit
    Mandal, Abhijit
    Aggarwal M, Lalit
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (04): : 1566 - 1573