Clinically relevant investigation of flattening filter-free skin dose

被引:3
|
作者
Guy, Christopher L. [1 ]
Karki, Kishor [1 ]
Sharma, Manju [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Siyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, 401 Coll St,POB 980058, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
关键词
flattening filter-free; FFF; skin dose; field size; beam energy; multileaf collimator; PHOTON BEAMS; MONTE-CARLO; ACCELERATOR;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v17i6.6307
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
As flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams become readily available for treatment delivery in techniques such as SBRT, thorough investigation of skin dose from FFF photon beams is necessary under clinically relevant conditions. Using a parallel-plate PTW Markus chamber placed in a custom water-equivalent phantom, surface-dose measurements were taken at 2 x 2, 3 x 3, 4 x 4, 6 x 6, 8 x 8, 10 x 10, 20 x 20, and 30 x 30 cm(2) field sizes, at 80, 90, and 100 cm source-to-surface distances (SSDs), and with fields defined by jaws and multileaf collimator (MLC) using multiple beam energies (6X, 6XFFF, 10X, and 10XFFF). The same set of measurements was repeated with the chamber at a reference depth of 10 cm. Each surface measurement was normalized by its corresponding reference depth measurement for analysis. The FFF surface doses at 100 cm SSD were higher than flattened surface doses by 45% at 2 x 2 cm(2) to 13% at 20 x 20 cm(2) for 6 MV energy. These surface dose differences varied to a greater degree as energy increased, ranging from +63% at 2 x 2 cm(2) to -2% at 20 x 20 cm(2) for 10 MV. At small field sizes, higher energy increased FFF surface dose relative to flattened surface dose; while at larger field sizes, relative FFF surface dose was higher for lower energies. At both energies investigated, decreasing SSD caused a decrease in the ratios of FFF-to-flattened surface dose. Variability with SSD of FFF-to-flattened surface dose differences increased with field size and ranged from 0% to 6%. The field size at which FFF and flattened beams gave the same skin dose increased with decreasing beam energy. Surface dose was higher with MLC fields compared to jaw fields under most conditions, with the difference reaching its maximum at a field size between 4 x 4 cm(2) and 6 x 6 cm(2) for a given energy and SSD. This study conveyed the magnitude of surface dose in a clinically meaningful manner by reporting results normalized to 10 cm depth dose instead of depth of dose maximum.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 148
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinically-Relevant Investigation of Flattening Filter Free Skin Dose
    Guy, C.
    Karki, K.
    Sharma, M.
    Kim, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3374 - 3374
  • [2] Surface Dose Investigation of the Flattening Filter-Free Photon Beams
    Wang, Yuenan
    Khan, Mohammad K.
    Ting, Joseph Y.
    Easterling, Stephen B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (02): : E281 - E285
  • [3] On flattening filter-free portal dosimetry
    Pardo, Eduardo
    Castro Novais, Juan
    Molina Lopez, Maria Yolanda
    Ruiz Maqueda, Sheila
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (04): : 132 - 145
  • [4] The comparison of properties for radiotherapy with flattening filter-free and flattening filter beam
    Gu, J. H.
    Won, H. S.
    Hong, J. W.
    Chang, N. J.
    Park, J. H.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S978 - S978
  • [5] Comparison of skin dose of flattening filter and flattening filter-free beam in volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment plan for head and neck cancer
    Lam Pham Hong
    Dung Phan Tien
    Thai Hoang Huu
    Lam Nguyen Tung
    Tu Nguyen Duong
    Van Anh Nguyen Thi
    Trang Pham Quang
    [J]. 2023 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ICHST 2023, 2023,
  • [6] Skin Dose From Flattening Filter Free Beams: A Monte Carlo Investigation
    Zhang, G.
    Javedan, K.
    Moros, E.
    Latifi, K.
    Feygelman, V.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3815 - 3815
  • [7] Surface Dose Evaluation of the Equivalent Quality Flattening Filter-Free Photon Beams
    Meshram, M.
    Pramanik, S.
    Ranjith, C. P.
    Meshram, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (06) : 3502 - 3502
  • [8] Dosimetric impact of flattening filter and flattening filter-free beams on IMRT planning of NSCLC
    Lee, S. W. Y.
    Or, K. M. K.
    Kwong, Y. P. J.
    Choy, Y. H. S.
    Kwong, C. Y. K.
    Keung, H. K.
    Wu, V. W. C.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 119 : S485 - S486
  • [9] Dose Rate Response of Digital Megavolt Imager Detector for Flattening Filter-Free Beams
    Xu, Z.
    Kim, J.
    Han, J.
    Hsia, A.
    Ryu, S.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2889 - 2889
  • [10] Dose rate response of Digital Megavolt Imager detector for flattening filter-free beams
    Xu, Zhigang
    Kim, Jinkoo
    Han, James
    Hsia, An Ting
    Ryu, Samuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (04): : 141 - 147