Comparative analysis of systems thinking and Goldratt's thinking processes: Task analysis for enhancing organizational knowledge management

被引:0
|
作者
Musa, PF [1 ]
Burns, JR [1 ]
Beruvides, MG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The focus in this research is on the effectiveness of two problem solving or task analysis methodologies in order to enhance the management of knowledge in organizations. The two methodologies are systems thinking [32] and Goldratt's thinking processes [13] [14] Rationally, since knowledge management emphasizes streamlining activities at the organization-wide level and discourages sub-optimization, it seems logical to borrow from systems thinking and Goldratt's thinking processes since they are explicitly based on an organization-wide perspective. One of the goals of the research is to investigate the effectiveness of the two theories in managing task domains when controlling for individual differences. The synergies between the two theories are also investigated. In this research, knowledge management centers more on humans rather than on computers. A background overview of knowledge and knowledge management is first presented. Within the context of knowledge management, the subject of task analysis or problem solving is then presented. Fundamentally, knowledge management has to do with the creation of explicit processes that enhance knowledge and learning throughout the organization. Maintaining this perspective, knowledge management is defined as "the systematic, explicit, and deliberate building, renewal, and application of knowledge to maximize the enterprise's knowledge-related effectiveness and returns from its knowledge asset" [20]. Since organizations are often made of workgroups or teams, and the workgroups are, in turn, made up of individuals, when we speak of organizational learning or knowledge management, aggregation necessarily has to be preceded by analysis at the individual level. Using masters degree students as subjects, several hypotheses are generated and tested. The results of the study are presented and analyzed. It is believed that the results of this study will be helpful for managers to gain a better understanding of the dynamics of the two task analysis methods investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 290
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systems thinking framework for knowledge management
    Rubenstein-Montano, B
    Liebowitz, J
    Buchwalter, J
    McCaw, D
    Newman, B
    Rebeck, K
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2001, 31 (01) : 5 - 16
  • [2] Fusing Systems Thinking with Knowledge Management
    Nakamori, Yoshiteru
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2020, 29 (03) : 291 - 305
  • [3] Fusing Systems Thinking with Knowledge Management
    Yoshiteru Nakamori
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2020, 29 : 291 - 305
  • [4] Systematic Thinking and Archetype Analysis on Organizational Human Resources Management
    Zhang, X. F.
    [J]. ICPOM2008: PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF PRODUCTION AND OPERATION MANAGEMENT, VOLUMES 1-3, 2008, : 1671 - 1674
  • [5] Linking Critical Thinking and Knowledge Management: A Conceptual Analysis
    Indrasiene, Valdone
    Jegeleviciene, Violeta
    Merfeldaite, Odeta
    Penkauskiene, Daiva
    Pivoriene, Jolanta
    Railiene, Asta
    Sadauskas, Justinas
    Valaviciene, Natalija
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (03) : 1 - 17
  • [6] Project Management: The Task of Holistic Systems Thinking
    Aramo-Immonen, Heli
    Vanharanta, Hannu
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING, 2009, 19 (06): : 582 - 600
  • [7] Systemic thinking as the philosophical foundation for knowledge management and organizational learning
    Johanessen, JA
    Olaisen, J
    Olsen, B
    [J]. KYBERNETES, 1999, 28 (01) : 24 - 46
  • [8] Coordination analysis to two thinking model on knowledge team management
    An Yunjie
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING - MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION STUDIES SECTION, 2007, : 958 - 961
  • [9] Divergent thinking in four-year-old children: An analysis of thinking processes in performing the Alternative Uses Task
    Bai, Honghong
    Mulder, Hanna
    Moerbeek, Mirjam
    Kroesbergen, Evelyn H.
    Leseman, Paul P. M.
    [J]. THINKING SKILLS AND CREATIVITY, 2021, 40
  • [10] Applying systems thinking in the evaluation of organizational learning and knowledge creation
    Paajanen, P
    Kantola, J
    Karwowski, W
    Vanharanta, H
    [J]. ISAS/CITSA 2004: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS AND 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS: COMMUNICATIONS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES AND COMPUTING, 2004, : 161 - 166