Comparative analysis of systems thinking and Goldratt's thinking processes: Task analysis for enhancing organizational knowledge management

被引:0
|
作者
Musa, PF [1 ]
Burns, JR [1 ]
Beruvides, MG [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The focus in this research is on the effectiveness of two problem solving or task analysis methodologies in order to enhance the management of knowledge in organizations. The two methodologies are systems thinking [32] and Goldratt's thinking processes [13] [14] Rationally, since knowledge management emphasizes streamlining activities at the organization-wide level and discourages sub-optimization, it seems logical to borrow from systems thinking and Goldratt's thinking processes since they are explicitly based on an organization-wide perspective. One of the goals of the research is to investigate the effectiveness of the two theories in managing task domains when controlling for individual differences. The synergies between the two theories are also investigated. In this research, knowledge management centers more on humans rather than on computers. A background overview of knowledge and knowledge management is first presented. Within the context of knowledge management, the subject of task analysis or problem solving is then presented. Fundamentally, knowledge management has to do with the creation of explicit processes that enhance knowledge and learning throughout the organization. Maintaining this perspective, knowledge management is defined as "the systematic, explicit, and deliberate building, renewal, and application of knowledge to maximize the enterprise's knowledge-related effectiveness and returns from its knowledge asset" [20]. Since organizations are often made of workgroups or teams, and the workgroups are, in turn, made up of individuals, when we speak of organizational learning or knowledge management, aggregation necessarily has to be preceded by analysis at the individual level. Using masters degree students as subjects, several hypotheses are generated and tested. The results of the study are presented and analyzed. It is believed that the results of this study will be helpful for managers to gain a better understanding of the dynamics of the two task analysis methods investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 290
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS FOR ISLAND PROBLEMS - USING SYSTEMS THINKING AND KNOWLEDGE FORMALISMS FOR ELICITING AND REPRESENTING TASK KNOWLEDGE
    DARZENTAS, J
    [J]. SYSTEMS PRACTICE, 1993, 6 (05): : 541 - 548
  • [22] Developing a systems thinking guide for enhancing knowledge mobilisation in prevention research
    Irving, Michelle J.
    Pescud, Melanie
    Howse, Eloise
    Haynes, Abby
    Rychetnik, Lucie
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2023, 33 (02):
  • [23] Thinking on University's Tacit Knowledge Management and Strategies
    Zhan Changchun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS A-C, 2008, : 1686 - 1690
  • [24] Thinking processes in code.org: A relational analysis approach to computational thinking
    Kale, Ugur
    Yuan, Jiangmei
    Roy, Abhik
    [J]. COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2023, 33 (04) : 545 - 566
  • [25] Systems Thinking during Systems Analysis and Design
    Ferratt, Thomas W.
    [J]. SIGMIS-CPR'14: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2014 CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND PEOPLE RESEARCH, 2014, : 163 - 169
  • [26] Systems Thinking: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis
    Hossain, Niamat Ullah Ibne
    Dayarathna, Vidanelage L.
    Nagahi, Morteza
    Jaradat, Raed
    [J]. SYSTEMS, 2020, 8 (03): : 1 - 26
  • [27] ANALYSIS OF SOFT TRENDS IN SYSTEMS THINKING
    KIJIMA, K
    MACKNESS, J
    [J]. SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 1987, 4 (04): : 235 - 241
  • [28] Systems Thinking and Team Performance Analysis
    Soltanzadeh, Sadjad
    Mooney, Mitchell
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SPORT COACHING JOURNAL, 2016, 3 (02) : 184 - 191
  • [29] Systems Thinking in Education: A Bibliometric Analysis
    Bozkurt, Nidan Oyman
    Bozkurt, Erkan
    [J]. EGITIM VE BILIM-EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, 2024, 49 (218): : 205 - 231
  • [30] ARE YOU GROWING SYSTEMS THINKING MANAGERS - USE A SYSTEMS-MODEL TO TEACH AND PRACTICE ORGANIZATIONAL ANALYSIS AND PLANNING, MANAGEMENT POLICY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL-DEVELOPMENT
    ZIEGENFUSS, JT
    [J]. SYSTEMS PRACTICE, 1992, 5 (05): : 509 - 527