Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation - A biomechanical analysis

被引:84
|
作者
Lehman, RA
Kuklo, TR
Belmont, PJ
Andersen, RC
Polly, DW
机构
[1] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
biomechanics; bone mineral density; insertional torque; pedicle screw; sacral promontory; sacrum; spinal fixation;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200204150-00006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A biomechanical study of human cadaveric sacra using insertional torque and bone mineral density was conducted to determine the optimal sagittal trajectory of S1 pedicle screws. Objective. To measure the maximal insertional torque of sacral promontory versus bicortical pedicle screw fixation. Summary of Background Data. Fixation of instrumentation to the sacrum is commonly accomplished using S1 pedicle screws, with previous studies reporting biomechanical advantages of bicortical over unicortical S1 screws. The biomechanical effect of bicortical screws paralleling the endplate) versus screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory is unknown. Methods. For this study, 10 fresh frozen cadaver sacra were harvested and evaluated with dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry to assess bone mineral density. Matched 7.5-mm monoaxial stainless steel pedicle screws then were randomly assigned by side (left versus right) and placed bicortically or into the apex of the sacral promontory under direct visualization. Maximum insertional torque was recorded for each screw revolution with a digital torque wrench (TQJE1500, Snap-On Tools, Kenosha, WI). Results. Maximum bicortical S1 screw insertional torque averaged 5.22 +/- 0.83 inch-pounds, as compared with the maximum sacral promontory S1 screw insertional torque of 10.34 +/- 1.94 inch-pounds. This resulted in a 99% increase in maximum insertional torque (P = 0.005) using the "tricorticat" technique, with the screw directed into the sacral promontory. Mean bone mineral density was 940 +/- 0.25 mg/cm(2) (range, 507-1428 mg/cm(2)). The bone mineral density correlated with maximal insertional torque for the sacral promontory technique (r = 0.806; P 0.005), but not for the bicortical technique (r = 0.48; P = 0.16). Conclusions. The screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory of the S1 pedicle resulted in an average 99% increase in peak insertional torque (P = 0,005), as compared with bicortical S1 pedicle screw fixation. Tricortical pedicle screw fixation correlates directly with bone mineral density.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 811
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biomechanical Analysis of Cortical Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation Stability in TLIF, PLIF, and XLIF Applications
    Nomoto, Edward K.
    Fogel, Guy R.
    Rasouli, Alexandre
    Bundy, Justin, V
    Turner, Alexander W.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 9 (02) : 162 - 168
  • [42] Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation superior than bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis
    Lu, Pei
    Pan, Ting
    Dai, Teng
    Chen, Gang
    Shi, Ke-qin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2018, 13
  • [43] Biomechanical comparison of unicortical versus bicortical C1 lateral mass screw fixation
    Eck, Jason C.
    Walker, Matt P.
    Currier, Bradord L.
    Chen, Qingshan
    Yaszemski, Michael J.
    An, Kai-Nan
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2007, 20 (07): : 505 - 508
  • [44] Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation superior than bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis
    Pei Lu
    Ting Pan
    Teng Dai
    Gang Chen
    Ke-qin Shi
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13
  • [45] Biomechanical characterization of bilateral pedicle screw internal fixation combinations on lumbar vertebrae
    Li, Weiqi
    Zhang, Peiming
    Gan, Feihong
    ACTA OF BIOENGINEERING AND BIOMECHANICS, 2023, 25 (03) : 43 - 51
  • [46] Pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic spine:: An in vitro biomechanical study on different configurations
    Deviren, V
    Acaroglu, E
    Lee, J
    Fujita, M
    Hu, S
    Lenke, LG
    Polly, D
    Kuklo, TR
    O'Brien, M
    Brumfield, D
    Puttlitz, CM
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (22) : 2530 - 2537
  • [47] Biomechanical study of the lumbar spine using a unilateral pedicle screw fixation system
    Kasai, Yuichi
    Inaba, Tadashi
    Kato, Takaya
    Matsumura, Yoshihiro
    Akeda, Koji
    Uchida, Atsumasa
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 17 (03) : 364 - 367
  • [48] Biomechanical strength impact of lateral wall breach on spinal pedicle screw fixation
    Ge, D. -W.
    Chen, H. -T.
    Qian, Z. -Y.
    Zhang, S.
    Zhuang, Y.
    Yang, L.
    Cao, X. -J.
    Sui, T.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 22 : 63 - 68
  • [49] A biomechanical comparison between cortical bone trajectory fixation and pedicle screw fixation (vol 10, 125, 2015)
    Oshino, Hiroki
    Sakakibara, Toshihiko
    Inaba, Tadashi
    Yoshikawa, Takamasa
    Kato, Takaya
    Kasai, Yuichi
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10
  • [50] A Bicortical Pedicle Screw in the Cephalad Trajectory Is the Best Option for the Fixation of an Osteoporotic Vertebra: A Finite Element Study
    Murata, Akimasa
    Tsutsui, Shunji
    Yamamoto, Ei
    Kozaki, Takuhei
    Nakanishi, Ryuichiro
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 8 (05): : 510 - 517