Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation - A biomechanical analysis

被引:84
|
作者
Lehman, RA
Kuklo, TR
Belmont, PJ
Andersen, RC
Polly, DW
机构
[1] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
biomechanics; bone mineral density; insertional torque; pedicle screw; sacral promontory; sacrum; spinal fixation;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200204150-00006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A biomechanical study of human cadaveric sacra using insertional torque and bone mineral density was conducted to determine the optimal sagittal trajectory of S1 pedicle screws. Objective. To measure the maximal insertional torque of sacral promontory versus bicortical pedicle screw fixation. Summary of Background Data. Fixation of instrumentation to the sacrum is commonly accomplished using S1 pedicle screws, with previous studies reporting biomechanical advantages of bicortical over unicortical S1 screws. The biomechanical effect of bicortical screws paralleling the endplate) versus screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory is unknown. Methods. For this study, 10 fresh frozen cadaver sacra were harvested and evaluated with dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry to assess bone mineral density. Matched 7.5-mm monoaxial stainless steel pedicle screws then were randomly assigned by side (left versus right) and placed bicortically or into the apex of the sacral promontory under direct visualization. Maximum insertional torque was recorded for each screw revolution with a digital torque wrench (TQJE1500, Snap-On Tools, Kenosha, WI). Results. Maximum bicortical S1 screw insertional torque averaged 5.22 +/- 0.83 inch-pounds, as compared with the maximum sacral promontory S1 screw insertional torque of 10.34 +/- 1.94 inch-pounds. This resulted in a 99% increase in maximum insertional torque (P = 0.005) using the "tricorticat" technique, with the screw directed into the sacral promontory. Mean bone mineral density was 940 +/- 0.25 mg/cm(2) (range, 507-1428 mg/cm(2)). The bone mineral density correlated with maximal insertional torque for the sacral promontory technique (r = 0.806; P 0.005), but not for the bicortical technique (r = 0.48; P = 0.16). Conclusions. The screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory of the S1 pedicle resulted in an average 99% increase in peak insertional torque (P = 0,005), as compared with bicortical S1 pedicle screw fixation. Tricortical pedicle screw fixation correlates directly with bone mineral density.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 811
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative biomechanical analysis of monocortical and bicortical polyaxial screw rod fixation in canine lumbar vertebral stabilization
    Guevar, Julien
    Voumard, Benjamin
    Bergman, Robert
    Precht, Christina
    Forterre, Franck
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2025, 11
  • [32] BIOMECHANICAL STUDY OF PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION STRENGTH: ASSOCIATION OF SCREW MALPOSITION AND SCREW INSERTION TORQUE
    Tsai, Tsung-Ting
    Chen, Yu-Hung
    Liao, Chao-Yaug
    Lin, Hsin-Tzu
    Liu, Mu-Yi
    Chen, Jin-Kai
    Lai, Po-Liang
    Tai, Ching-Lung
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 19 (02)
  • [33] New Biomechanical Approach for Evaluation of Spinal Pedicle Screw Fixation Stability
    Einafshar, Mohammadjavad
    Hashemi, Ata
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 41 (04) : 447 - 455
  • [34] New Biomechanical Approach for Evaluation of Spinal Pedicle Screw Fixation Stability
    Mohammadjavad Einafshar
    Ata Hashemi
    Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 2021, 41 : 447 - 455
  • [35] Sacral Endplate Penetrating Screw for Lumbosacral Fixation: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study
    Grigoryan, Grigor
    Inceoglu, Serkan
    Danisa, Olumide A.
    Cheng, Wayne
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 17 (04) : 396 - 402
  • [36] Freehand pedicle screw fixation: A safe recipe for dorsal, lumbar and sacral spine
    Junaid, Muhammad
    Afzal, Ali
    Kalsoom, Anisa
    Bukhari, Syed Sarmad
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 35 (03) : 680 - 684
  • [37] Biomechanical Comparison of Corticopedicular Spine Fixation versus Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Finite Element Analysis Model
    Farooqi, Ali S.
    Narayanan, Rajkishen
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 190 : E129 - E136
  • [38] Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Facet Joint Fusion Fixation Device With Conventional Pedicle Screw Fixation Device: A Finite Element Analysis
    Sun, Feilong
    Qiu, Haiyang
    Ji, Yufei
    Wang, Longchao
    Lei, Wei
    Zhang, Yang
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2025, 17 (04) : 1230 - 1242
  • [39] Biomechanical analysis of cement augmentation techniques on pedicle screw fixation in osteopenic bone: A cadaveric study
    Benson C.D.
    Lansford T.
    Cotton J.
    Burton D.
    Jackson R.S.
    McIff T.
    Spine Deformity, 2014, 2 (1) : 28 - 33
  • [40] Biomechanical Evaluation of an Adaptive-Motion Pedicle Screw Fixation System: Experimental and Numerical Analysis
    Zou, Renling
    Zhang, Xuan
    Li, Yuchen
    Wang, Jiaqing
    Hu, Xiufang
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2023, 145 (11):