Advantage of pedicle screw fixation directed into the apex of the sacral promontory over bicortical fixation - A biomechanical analysis

被引:84
|
作者
Lehman, RA
Kuklo, TR
Belmont, PJ
Andersen, RC
Polly, DW
机构
[1] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Rehabil, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[2] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Surg, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
关键词
biomechanics; bone mineral density; insertional torque; pedicle screw; sacral promontory; sacrum; spinal fixation;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200204150-00006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A biomechanical study of human cadaveric sacra using insertional torque and bone mineral density was conducted to determine the optimal sagittal trajectory of S1 pedicle screws. Objective. To measure the maximal insertional torque of sacral promontory versus bicortical pedicle screw fixation. Summary of Background Data. Fixation of instrumentation to the sacrum is commonly accomplished using S1 pedicle screws, with previous studies reporting biomechanical advantages of bicortical over unicortical S1 screws. The biomechanical effect of bicortical screws paralleling the endplate) versus screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory is unknown. Methods. For this study, 10 fresh frozen cadaver sacra were harvested and evaluated with dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry to assess bone mineral density. Matched 7.5-mm monoaxial stainless steel pedicle screws then were randomly assigned by side (left versus right) and placed bicortically or into the apex of the sacral promontory under direct visualization. Maximum insertional torque was recorded for each screw revolution with a digital torque wrench (TQJE1500, Snap-On Tools, Kenosha, WI). Results. Maximum bicortical S1 screw insertional torque averaged 5.22 +/- 0.83 inch-pounds, as compared with the maximum sacral promontory S1 screw insertional torque of 10.34 +/- 1.94 inch-pounds. This resulted in a 99% increase in maximum insertional torque (P = 0.005) using the "tricorticat" technique, with the screw directed into the sacral promontory. Mean bone mineral density was 940 +/- 0.25 mg/cm(2) (range, 507-1428 mg/cm(2)). The bone mineral density correlated with maximal insertional torque for the sacral promontory technique (r = 0.806; P 0.005), but not for the bicortical technique (r = 0.48; P = 0.16). Conclusions. The screws directed into the apex of the sacral promontory of the S1 pedicle resulted in an average 99% increase in peak insertional torque (P = 0,005), as compared with bicortical S1 pedicle screw fixation. Tricortical pedicle screw fixation correlates directly with bone mineral density.
引用
收藏
页码:806 / 811
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advantage of Pedicle Screw Placement Into the Sacral Promontory (Tricortical Purchase) on Lumbosacral Fixation
    Kato, Minori
    Taneichi, Hiroshi
    Suda, Kota
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2015, 28 (06): : E336 - E342
  • [2] Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Fixation Techniques of Sacral Pedicle Screw in Osteoporotic Condition
    Yu, Bin-Sheng
    Zhuang, Xin-Ming
    Zheng, Zhao-Min
    Zhang, Jia-Fang
    Li, Ze-Min
    Lu, William W.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2010, 23 (06): : 404 - 409
  • [3] SACRAL AND LUMBAR PEDICLE FIXATION - A BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION
    JACOBS, RR
    JAUCH, EC
    JACOBS, CR
    MONTESANO, PX
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1987, 20 (09) : 905 - 905
  • [4] Biomechanical Analysis of Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures
    McDonnell, Matthew
    Shah, Kalpit N.
    Paller, David J.
    Thakur, Nikhil A.
    Koruprolu, Sarath
    Palumbo, Mark A.
    Daniels, Alan H.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (03) : E514 - E518
  • [5] A Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Thoracic Screw Fixation Method: Transarticular Screw Fixation vs Traditional Pedicle Screw Fixation
    Yu, Yang
    Xie, Ning
    Song, Shaohua
    Zhang, Wei
    Guo, Qunfeng
    Ni, Bin
    Luo, Junsheng
    NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 69 : 141 - 145
  • [7] BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF SCREW LOAD SHARING IN PEDICLE FIXATION OF THE LUMBAR SPINE
    KOSTUIK, JP
    MUNTING, E
    VALDEVIT, A
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1994, 7 (05): : 394 - 401
  • [8] A biomechanical cadaveric analysis of polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation
    Frankel, Bruce M.
    D'Agostino, Sabino
    Wang, Chiang
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 7 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [9] Biomechanical Comparison of Costotransverse Process Screw Fixation and Pedicle Screw Fixation of the Upper Thoracic Spine
    Little, Andrew S.
    Brasiliense, Leonardo B. C.
    Lazaro, Bruno C. R.
    Reyes, Phillip M.
    Dickman, Curtis A.
    Crawford, Neil R.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 66 (03) : 178 - 182
  • [10] Biomechanical comparison of sacral and transarticular sacroiliac screw fixation
    Léo Fradet
    Rohan-Jean Bianco
    Robert Tatsumi
    John Coleman
    Carl-Éric Aubin
    Spine Deformity, 2020, 8 : 853 - 862