Machine Learning Classifiers for Modeling Soil Characteristics by Geophysics Investigations: A Comparative Study

被引:7
|
作者
Lim, Chee Soon [1 ]
Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam [1 ]
Motahari, Mohammad Reza [2 ]
Armaghani, Danial Jahed [3 ]
Saad, Rosli [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Engn, Geotrop Ctr Trop Geoengn, Sch Civil Engn, Skudai 81310, Malaysia
[2] Arak Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Arak 3815688349, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Phys, Geophys Sect, George Town 11800, Malaysia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 17期
关键词
soil classification; tree-based models; geophysics investigation; P-wave; S-wave; laboratory testing; NEURAL-NETWORK; PREDICTION; ROCK; OPTIMIZATION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.3390/app10175734
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
To design geotechnical structures efficiently, it is important to examine soil's physical properties. Therefore, classifying soil with respect to geophysical parameters is an advantageous and popular approach. Novel, quick, cost, and time effective machine learning techniques can facilitate this classification. This study employs three kinds of machine learning models, including the Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Networks, and Bayesian Networks. The Decision tree models included the chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID), classification and regression trees (CART), quick, unbiased, and efficient statistical tree (QUEST), and C5; the Artificial Neural Networks models included Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF); and BN models included the Tree Augmented Naive (TAN) and Markov Blanket, which were employed to predict the soil classifications using geophysics investigations and laboratory tests. The performance of each model was assessed through the accuracy, stability and gains. The results showed that while the BAYESIANMARKOV model achieved the highest overall accuracy (100%) in training phase, this model achieved the lowest accuracy (34.21%) in testing phases. Thus, this model had the worst stability. The QUEST had the second highest overall training accuracy (99.12%) and had the highest overall testing accuracy (94.74%). Thus, this model was somewhat stable and had an acceptable overall training and testing accuracy to predict the soil characteristics. The future studies can use the findings of this paper as a benchmark to classify the soil characteristics and select the best machine learning technique to perform this classification.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Machine learning for physical motion identification using EEG signals: a comparative study of classifiers and hyperparameter tuning
    Lee P.F.
    Chong K.Y.
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2024, 15 (04) : 2455 - 2466
  • [42] A Comparative Study of GP-based and State-of-the-art Classifiers on a Synthetic Machine Learning Benchmark
    Orzechowski, Patryk
    Renc, Pawel
    La Cava, William
    Moore, Jason H.
    Sitek, Arkadiusz
    Was, Jaroslaw
    Wagenaar, Joost
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022, 2022, : 276 - 279
  • [43] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning, Ensemble Learning and Deep Learning Classifiers for Parkinson’s Disease Detection
    Goyal P.
    Rani R.
    SN Computer Science, 5 (1)
  • [44] Comparative Evaluation of Some Quality Characteristics of Sunflower Oilseeds (Helianthus annuus L.) Through Machine Learning Classifiers
    Necati Çetin
    Kevser Karaman
    Erman Beyzi
    Cevdet Sağlam
    Bahadır Demirel
    Food Analytical Methods, 2021, 14 : 1666 - 1681
  • [45] Comparative Evaluation of Some Quality Characteristics of Sunflower Oilseeds (Helianthus annuus L.) Through Machine Learning Classifiers
    cetin, Necati
    Karaman, Kevser
    Beyzi, Erman
    Saglam, Cevdet
    Demirel, Bahadir
    FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2021, 14 (08) : 1666 - 1681
  • [46] Fine-Tuned Machine Learning Classifiers for Diagnosing Parkinson's Disease Using Vocal Characteristics: A Comparative Analysis
    Meral, Mehmet
    Ozbilgin, Ferdi
    Durmus, Fatih
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2025, 15 (05)
  • [47] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms along with Classifiers for Network Intrusion Detection
    Choudhury, Sumouli
    Bhowal, Anirban
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART TECHNOLOGIES AND MANAGEMENT FOR COMPUTING, COMMUNICATION, CONTROLS, ENERGY AND MATERIALS (ICSTM), 2015, : 89 - 95
  • [48] A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Classifiers and Ensemble Techniques in Financial Distress Prediction
    Sreedharan, Meenu
    Khedr, Ahmed M.
    El Bannany, Magdi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 17TH INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, SIGNALS & DEVICES (SSD 2020), 2020, : 653 - 657
  • [49] Imbalanced data issues in machine learning classifiers: a case study
    Gong, Mingxing
    JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RISK, 2022, 17 (04): : 17 - 36
  • [50] House price prediction modeling using machine learning techniques: a comparative study
    Yagmur, Ayten
    Kayakus, Mehmet
    Terzioglu, Mustafa
    AESTIMUM, 2022, 81 : 39 - 51