Machine Learning Classifiers for Modeling Soil Characteristics by Geophysics Investigations: A Comparative Study

被引:7
|
作者
Lim, Chee Soon [1 ]
Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam [1 ]
Motahari, Mohammad Reza [2 ]
Armaghani, Danial Jahed [3 ]
Saad, Rosli [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Engn, Geotrop Ctr Trop Geoengn, Sch Civil Engn, Skudai 81310, Malaysia
[2] Arak Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Arak 3815688349, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Phys, Geophys Sect, George Town 11800, Malaysia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 17期
关键词
soil classification; tree-based models; geophysics investigation; P-wave; S-wave; laboratory testing; NEURAL-NETWORK; PREDICTION; ROCK; OPTIMIZATION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.3390/app10175734
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
To design geotechnical structures efficiently, it is important to examine soil's physical properties. Therefore, classifying soil with respect to geophysical parameters is an advantageous and popular approach. Novel, quick, cost, and time effective machine learning techniques can facilitate this classification. This study employs three kinds of machine learning models, including the Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Networks, and Bayesian Networks. The Decision tree models included the chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID), classification and regression trees (CART), quick, unbiased, and efficient statistical tree (QUEST), and C5; the Artificial Neural Networks models included Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF); and BN models included the Tree Augmented Naive (TAN) and Markov Blanket, which were employed to predict the soil classifications using geophysics investigations and laboratory tests. The performance of each model was assessed through the accuracy, stability and gains. The results showed that while the BAYESIANMARKOV model achieved the highest overall accuracy (100%) in training phase, this model achieved the lowest accuracy (34.21%) in testing phases. Thus, this model had the worst stability. The QUEST had the second highest overall training accuracy (99.12%) and had the highest overall testing accuracy (94.74%). Thus, this model was somewhat stable and had an acceptable overall training and testing accuracy to predict the soil characteristics. The future studies can use the findings of this paper as a benchmark to classify the soil characteristics and select the best machine learning technique to perform this classification.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative Performance Analysis of Machine Learning Classifiers on Ovarian Cancer Dataset
    Bhattacharjee, Sharmistha
    Singh, Yumnam Jayanta
    Ray, Dipankar
    2017 THIRD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH IN COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMMUNICATION NETWORKS (ICRCICN), 2017, : 213 - 218
  • [32] Machine Learning Precision for Mangosteen Maturity: A Comparative Analysis of Conventional Classifiers
    Thirumugam, Ram Kumar
    Yacob, Yasmin Mohd
    Ibrahim, Wan Mahfuzah Wan
    Asi, Salina Mohd
    Sudin, Suhizaz
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 33 (01): : 283 - 312
  • [33] A comparative study of support vector machine and logistic model tree classifiers for shallow landslide susceptibility modeling
    Mousa Abedini
    Bahareh Ghasemian
    Ataollah Shirzadi
    Dieu Tien Bui
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2019, 78
  • [34] A comparative study of support vector machine and logistic model tree classifiers for shallow landslide susceptibility modeling
    Abedini, Mousa
    Ghasemian, Bahareh
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Dieu Tien Bui
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2019, 78 (18)
  • [35] Stroke Dataset Modeling: Comparative Study of Machine Learning Classification Methods
    Kitova, Kalina
    Ivanov, Ivan
    Hooper, Vincent
    ALGORITHMS, 2024, 17 (12)
  • [36] A comparative study of machine learning approaches for modeling concrete failure surfaces
    Reuter, Uwe
    Sultan, Ahmad
    Reischl, Dirk S.
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2018, 116 : 67 - 79
  • [37] Predictive modeling in urgent care: a comparative study of machine learning approaches
    Tang, Fengyi
    Xiao, Cao
    Wang, Fei
    Zhou, Jiayu
    JAMIA OPEN, 2018, 1 (01) : 87 - 98
  • [38] Permeable Breakwaters Performance Modeling: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques
    Gandomi, Mostafa
    Pirooz, Moharram Dolatshahi
    Varjavand, Iman
    Nikoo, Mohammad Reza
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (11)
  • [39] Learning Probabilistic Transfer Functions: A Comparative Study of Classifiers
    Soundararajan, K. P.
    Schultz, T.
    COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM, 2015, 34 (03) : 111 - 120
  • [40] A comparative study of machine learning classifiers for secure RF-PUF-based authentication in internet of things
    Ashtari, Amir
    Shabani, Ahmad
    Alizadeh, Bijan
    MICROPROCESSORS AND MICROSYSTEMS, 2022, 93