Machine Learning Classifiers for Modeling Soil Characteristics by Geophysics Investigations: A Comparative Study

被引:7
|
作者
Lim, Chee Soon [1 ]
Mohamad, Edy Tonnizam [1 ]
Motahari, Mohammad Reza [2 ]
Armaghani, Danial Jahed [3 ]
Saad, Rosli [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Fac Engn, Geotrop Ctr Trop Geoengn, Sch Civil Engn, Skudai 81310, Malaysia
[2] Arak Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Arak 3815688349, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Phys, Geophys Sect, George Town 11800, Malaysia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 17期
关键词
soil classification; tree-based models; geophysics investigation; P-wave; S-wave; laboratory testing; NEURAL-NETWORK; PREDICTION; ROCK; OPTIMIZATION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.3390/app10175734
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
To design geotechnical structures efficiently, it is important to examine soil's physical properties. Therefore, classifying soil with respect to geophysical parameters is an advantageous and popular approach. Novel, quick, cost, and time effective machine learning techniques can facilitate this classification. This study employs three kinds of machine learning models, including the Decision Tree, Artificial Neural Networks, and Bayesian Networks. The Decision tree models included the chi-square automatic interaction detection (CHAID), classification and regression trees (CART), quick, unbiased, and efficient statistical tree (QUEST), and C5; the Artificial Neural Networks models included Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF); and BN models included the Tree Augmented Naive (TAN) and Markov Blanket, which were employed to predict the soil classifications using geophysics investigations and laboratory tests. The performance of each model was assessed through the accuracy, stability and gains. The results showed that while the BAYESIANMARKOV model achieved the highest overall accuracy (100%) in training phase, this model achieved the lowest accuracy (34.21%) in testing phases. Thus, this model had the worst stability. The QUEST had the second highest overall training accuracy (99.12%) and had the highest overall testing accuracy (94.74%). Thus, this model was somewhat stable and had an acceptable overall training and testing accuracy to predict the soil characteristics. The future studies can use the findings of this paper as a benchmark to classify the soil characteristics and select the best machine learning technique to perform this classification.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Classifiers on Bioinformatics and Clinical Datasets
    Ranadive, Falguni
    Surti, Akil
    Sharma, Priyanka
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT (INDIACOM), 2019, : 608 - 611
  • [22] A comparative analysis of machine learning classifiers in the classification of resonant asteroids
    Smirnov, Evgeny
    ICARUS, 2024, 415
  • [23] Machine learning prediction of nanoparticle in vitro toxicity: A comparative study of classifiers and ensemble-classifiers using the Copeland Index
    Furxhi, Irini
    Murphy, Finbarr
    Mullins, Martin
    Poland, Craig A.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 312 : 157 - 166
  • [24] A Comparative Study of Local Net Modeling Using Machine Learning
    Melchert, Jackson
    Zhang, Boyu
    Davoodi, Azadeh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 GREAT LAKES SYMPOSIUM ON VLSI (GLSVLSI'18), 2018, : 273 - 278
  • [25] A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Classifiers for Electric Load Disaggregation based on an extended NILM dataset
    Bosco, Thais Berrettini
    Serrao Goncalves, Flavio Alessandro
    de Souza, Wesley Angelino
    2021 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS (INDUSCON), 2021, : 270 - 277
  • [26] A Comparative Study of One-Class Classifiers in Machine Learning Problems with Extreme Class Imbalance
    Sotiropoulos, Dionysios
    Giannoulis, Christos
    Tsihrintzis, George A.
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION, INTELLIGENCE, SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, IISA 2014, 2014, : 362 - 364
  • [27] Improving sepsis mortality prediction with machine learning: A comparative study of advanced classifiers and performance metrics
    Zhou, Puyu
    Duan, Jiazheng
    Li, Jianqing
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [28] A Comparative Study of Soil Liquefaction Assessment Using Machine Learning Models
    Shadi M. Hanandeh
    Wassel A. Al-Bodour
    Mustafa M. Hajij
    Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2022, 40 : 4721 - 4734
  • [29] A comparative study of soil classification machine learning models for construction management
    Obasi, Sally Ndikum Ngonsah
    Pemberton, Joseph
    Awe, Olushina Olawale
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2025, 25 (05) : 584 - 593
  • [30] A Comparative Study of Soil Liquefaction Assessment Using Machine Learning Models
    Hanandeh, Shadi M.
    Al-Bodour, Wassel A.
    Hajij, Mustafa M.
    GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 40 (09) : 4721 - 4734