Combined screening with mammography and ultrasound in a population-based screening program

被引:40
|
作者
Buchberger, Wolfgang [1 ,2 ]
Geiger-Gritsch, Sabine [2 ,3 ]
Knapp, Rudolf [4 ]
Gautsch, Kurt [5 ]
Oberaigner, Willi [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tirol Kliniken Ltd, Med Dept, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[2] UMIT Univ Hlth Sci Med Informat & Technol, Dept Publ Hlth, Hlth Serv Res & Hlth Technol Assessment, Eduard Wallnofer Zentrum 1, A-6060 Hall In Tirol, Austria
[3] Tirol Kliniken Ltd, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
[4] Kufstein Cty Hosp, Dept Radiol, Endachstr 27, A-6330 Kufstein, Austria
[5] Innsbruck Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Anichstr 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
Breast cancer screening; Mammography; Ultrasound; Breast density; Sensitivity; Specificity; INTERVAL BREAST CANCERS; DENSE BREASTS; WOMEN; SONOGRAPHY; US; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.01.022
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the performance of screening with mammography combined with ultrasound versus mammography alone in women at average risk for breast cancer. Methods: 66,680 women underwent physician-performed ultrasound as an adjunct to screening mammography. Histological results and follow-up at one year were used as reference standard for sensitivity. Main outcome measures were cancer detection rate, sensitivity, recall rate, biopsy rate, and positive predictive value of biopsy for combined screening with mammography plus ultrasound versus mammography alone. Results: The overall sensitivity of mammography only was 61.5% in women with dense breasts and 86.6% in women with non-dense breasts. The sensitivity of mammography plus ultrasound combined was 81.3% in women with dense breasts and 95.0% in women with non-dense breasts. Adjunctive ultrasound increased the recall rate from 10.5 to 16.5 per 1000 women screened, and increased the biopsy rate from 6.3 to 9.3 per 1000 women screened. The positive predictive value of biopsy was 55.5% (95% CI 50.6%-60.3%) for mammography alone and 43.3 (95% CI 39.4%-47.3%) for combined mammography plus ultrasound. Conclusions: Supplemental ultrasound improves cancer detection in screening of women at average risk for breast cancer. Recall rates and biopsy rates can be kept within acceptable limits.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 29
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A POPULATION-BASED SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY PROGRAM IN SASKATCHEWAN
    EDOUARD, L
    EBERTS, L
    BALDWIN, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1994, 84 (06) : 1030 - 1031
  • [2] Volume of screening mammography and performance in the Quebec population-based Breast Cancer Screening Program
    Théberge, I
    Hébert-Croteau, N
    Langlois, A
    Major, D
    Brisson, J
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2005, 172 (02) : 195 - 199
  • [3] Population-based mammography screening program in Latvia: Results of the first round
    Hegmane, A.
    Eglitis, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [4] Overdiagnosis among women attending a population-based mammography screening program
    Falk, Ragnhild Sorum
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Skaane, Per
    Haldorsen, Tor
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 133 (03) : 705 - 712
  • [5] Performance of 4 years of population-based mammography screening for breast cancer combined with ultrasound in Tyrol / Austria
    Sabine Geiger-Gritsch
    Martin Daniaux
    Wolfgang Buchberger
    Rudolf Knapp
    Willi Oberaigner
    [J]. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2018, 130 : 92 - 99
  • [6] Performance of 4 years of population-based mammography screening for breast cancer combined with ultrasound in Tyrol/Austria
    Geiger-Gritsch, Sabine
    Daniaux, Martin
    Buchberger, Wolfgang
    Knapp, Rudolf
    Oberaigner, Willi
    [J]. WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2018, 130 (3-4) : 92 - 99
  • [7] Concordance of population-based estimates of mammography screening
    Boudreau, Denise M.
    Luce, Casey L.
    Ludman, Evette
    Bonomi, Amy E.
    Fishman, Paul A.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 45 (04) : 262 - 266
  • [8] Comparison of Digital Mammography Alone and Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in a Population-based Screening Program
    Skaane, Per
    Bandos, Andriy I.
    Gullien, Randi
    Eben, Ellen B.
    Ekseth, Ulrika
    Haakenaasen, Unni
    Izadi, Mina
    Jebsen, Ingvild N.
    Jahr, Gunnar
    Krager, Mona
    Niklason, Loren T.
    Hofvind, Solveig
    Gur, David
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2013, 267 (01) : 47 - 56
  • [9] Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark
    von Euler-Chelpin, My
    Lillholm, Martin
    Vejborg, Ilse
    Nielsen, Mads
    Lynge, Elsebeth
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (01)
  • [10] Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark
    My von Euler-Chelpin
    Martin Lillholm
    Ilse Vejborg
    Mads Nielsen
    Elsebeth Lynge
    [J]. Breast Cancer Research, 21